HatchBox vs OpenShift

Overview

Red Hat OpenShift

Stacks1.6K

Followers1.4K

Votes517

GitHub Stars885

Forks510

HatchBox

Stacks9

Followers10

Votes0

HatchBox vs OpenShift: What are the differences?

Deployment Methods: HatchBox primarily focuses on making the deployment process as straightforward as possible using Ruby On Rails, Phoenix, and Docker with a single command deployment. On the other hand, OpenShift offers a more diverse approach, supporting multiple languages and frameworks, including Java, Ruby, Node.js, Python, and more, allowing for greater flexibility in deployment options.
Pricing Structure: HatchBox follows a simple pricing structure based on the number of servers, while OpenShift offers a tiered pricing model based on resources such as storage, memory, and computing power. This difference in pricing models can greatly affect the cost for users depending on their specific needs and usage patterns.
Ease of Use: HatchBox is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it ideal for developers looking for a straightforward deployment solution. In contrast, OpenShift offers a more complex and feature-rich platform geared towards enterprise users with advanced requirements in terms of scalability, security, and customization options.
Community Support: HatchBox has a smaller but dedicated community of users and contributors, which can be beneficial for receiving more personalized support and feedback. OpenShift, on the other hand, has a larger and more established community backed by Red Hat, offering a wider range of resources, tutorials, and community-driven solutions.
Integration Capabilities: HatchBox provides seamless integration with popular tools and services, such as GitHub, Slack, and more, allowing for a streamlined development and deployment process. OpenShift offers extensive integration capabilities with various third-party tools, plugins, and services, making it suitable for complex applications requiring sophisticated integrations.
Scalability and Performance: HatchBox is optimized for fast and efficient deployment of applications, making it suitable for small to medium-sized projects with moderate traffic. On the contrary, OpenShift boasts robust scalability and high-performance features, making it a preferred choice for enterprise-grade applications requiring advanced scalability and performance capabilities.

In Summary, HatchBox focuses on simplicity and Ruby On Rails deployments, while OpenShift offers greater flexibility, scalability, and customization options for enterprise users.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Red Hat OpenShift	HatchBox
OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.	Configure any server to run Ruby on Rails servers in minutes and without hassle.
Built-in support for Node.js, Ruby, Python, PHP, Perl, and Java (the standard in today's Enterprise);OpenShift is extensible with a customizable cartridge functionality that allows developers to add any other language they wish. We've seen everything from Clojure to Cobol running on OpenShift;OpenShift supports frameworks ranging from Spring, to Rails, to Play;Autoscaling- OpenShift can scale your application by adding additional instances of your application and enabling clustering. Alternatively, you can manually scale the amount of resources with which your application is deployed when needed;OpenShift by Red Hat is built on open-source technologies (Red Hat Enterprise Linux- RHEL);One Click Deployment- Deploying to the OpenShift platform is as easy a clicking a button or entering a "Git push" command	Choose your hosting provider; ActionCable; Automatic Databases; Customizable Nginx; Redis Support; Sidekiq; SSL & Lets Encrypt; Environment Variables; Secure By Default
Statistics
GitHub Stars 885	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 510	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 1.6K	Stacks 9
Followers 1.4K	Followers 10
Votes 517	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 99 Good free plan 63 Open Source 47 Easy setup 43 Nodejs support 42 Well documented Cons 2 Decisions are made for you, limiting your options 2 License cost 1 Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Rails Redis Sidekiq PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to Red Hat OpenShift, HatchBox?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

HatchBox vs OpenShift: What are the differences?

Deployment Methods: HatchBox primarily focuses on making the deployment process as straightforward as possible using Ruby On Rails, Phoenix, and Docker with a single command deployment. On the other hand, OpenShift offers a more diverse approach, supporting multiple languages and frameworks, including Java, Ruby, Node.js, Python, and more, allowing for greater flexibility in deployment options.
Pricing Structure: HatchBox follows a simple pricing structure based on the number of servers, while OpenShift offers a tiered pricing model based on resources such as storage, memory, and computing power. This difference in pricing models can greatly affect the cost for users depending on their specific needs and usage patterns.
Ease of Use: HatchBox is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it ideal for developers looking for a straightforward deployment solution. In contrast, OpenShift offers a more complex and feature-rich platform geared towards enterprise users with advanced requirements in terms of scalability, security, and customization options.
Community Support: HatchBox has a smaller but dedicated community of users and contributors, which can be beneficial for receiving more personalized support and feedback. OpenShift, on the other hand, has a larger and more established community backed by Red Hat, offering a wider range of resources, tutorials, and community-driven solutions.
Integration Capabilities: HatchBox provides seamless integration with popular tools and services, such as GitHub, Slack, and more, allowing for a streamlined development and deployment process. OpenShift offers extensive integration capabilities with various third-party tools, plugins, and services, making it suitable for complex applications requiring sophisticated integrations.
Scalability and Performance: HatchBox is optimized for fast and efficient deployment of applications, making it suitable for small to medium-sized projects with moderate traffic. On the contrary, OpenShift boasts robust scalability and high-performance features, making it a preferred choice for enterprise-grade applications requiring advanced scalability and performance capabilities.

In Summary, HatchBox focuses on simplicity and Ruby On Rails deployments, while OpenShift offers greater flexibility, scalability, and customization options for enterprise users.

HatchBox vs OpenShift

Overview