Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Google Kubernetes Engine vs OpenShift: What are the differences?
Introduction
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) and OpenShift are both popular platforms for managing containerized applications. While they share similarities, there are key differences that make each platform unique. This Markdown code provides a concise summary of the differences between GKE and OpenShift.
Managed vs Self-Managed: GKE is a managed Kubernetes service provided by Google Cloud, which means Google manages the underlying infrastructure, including the control plane. On the other hand, OpenShift is a self-managed platform that requires the user to set up and manage the control plane themselves.
Vendor Lock-in: GKE is tightly integrated with Google Cloud services, which can be beneficial for organizations already using Google Cloud or planning to do so. However, this can create vendor lock-in, as GKE may not be as compatible with other cloud providers. OpenShift, being an open-source platform, offers more flexibility and can be deployed on various cloud providers or on-premises.
Pricing Model: GKE has a pay-as-you-go pricing model where users pay for the resources they use. This can be advantageous for organizations with fluctuating workloads. OpenShift, being self-managed, often requires a subscription or license agreement, which may involve fixed costs. This can be more suitable for organizations with predictable workloads.
Ease of Deployment: GKE provides a streamlined and user-friendly deployment process, making it easier for users to set up and manage Kubernetes clusters. OpenShift, with its additional features and customization options, may have a steeper learning curve and more complex deployment process. It is better suited for organizations that require fine-grained control over their containerized applications.
Integrated Tools and Services: GKE leverages Google Cloud's extensive ecosystem of tools and services, such as monitoring, logging, load balancing, and auto-scaling, which are seamlessly integrated with the platform. OpenShift also provides similar capabilities but may require additional configuration or integration with external services.
Enterprise Support and Community: Both GKE and OpenShift have active communities and offer enterprise support options. However, GKE benefits from Google's reputation and resources, providing robust support and a large community of users. OpenShift, being an open-source project primarily supported by Red Hat, offers support through Red Hat's enterprise-level services.
In summary, GKE is a fully managed Kubernetes service with tight integration to Google Cloud, while OpenShift is a self-managed and more flexible platform that can be deployed across cloud providers. GKE offers a streamlined deployment process and Google Cloud integration, while OpenShift provides additional customization options and a broader range of deployment possibilities.
Pros of Google Kubernetes Engine
- Backed by Google18
- Powered by kubernetes18
- Docker13
- Scalable12
- Open source7
- Command line interface is intuitive3
- Decoupled app3
- Provisioning2
- Declarative management2
Pros of Red Hat OpenShift
- Good free plan99
- Open Source63
- Easy setup47
- Nodejs support43
- Well documented42
- Custom domains32
- Mongodb support28
- Clean and simple architecture27
- PHP support25
- Customizable environments21
- Ability to run CRON jobs11
- Easier than Heroku for a WordPress blog9
- Easy deployment8
- PostgreSQL support7
- Autoscaling7
- Good balance between Heroku and AWS for flexibility7
- Free, Easy Setup, Lot of Gear or D.I.Y Gear5
- Shell access to gears4
- Great Support3
- High Security3
- Logging & Metrics3
- Cloud Agnostic2
- Runs Anywhere - AWS, GCP, Azure2
- No credit card needed2
- Because it is easy to manage2
- Secure2
- Meteor support2
- Overly complicated and over engineered in majority of e2
- Golang support2
- Its free and offer custom domain usage2
- Autoscaling at a good price point1
- Easy setup and great customer support1
- MultiCloud1
- Great free plan with excellent support1
- This is the only free one among the three as of today1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Google Kubernetes Engine
Cons of Red Hat OpenShift
- Decisions are made for you, limiting your options2
- License cost2
- Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Google Kubernetes Engine?
What is Red Hat OpenShift?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Google Kubernetes Engine?
What companies use Red Hat OpenShift?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Google Kubernetes Engine?
What tools integrate with Red Hat OpenShift?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
Rafay Systems