Google Cloud Build vs Harness.io

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Google Cloud Build

492
203
+ 1
4
Harness.io

56
119
+ 1
6
Add tool

Google Cloud Build vs Harness.io: What are the differences?

<Google Cloud Build and Harness.io are both popular CI/CD tools used in software development projects.

  1. Integration: Google Cloud Build is tightly integrated with Google Cloud Platform (GCP) services, allowing seamless deployment of applications within GCP infrastructure. On the other hand, Harness.io provides integration with a wide range of cloud providers and tools, offering flexibility in deployment options beyond GCP.
  2. Pipeline Orchestration: Google Cloud Build focuses on simplicity and scalability, providing basic pipeline orchestration capabilities for continuous integration and delivery. In contrast, Harness.io offers advanced pipeline orchestration features, including visual workflows, automated testing, and deployment strategies to streamline the entire development process.
  3. Deployment Automation: Google Cloud Build primarily focuses on building and testing code, with limited support for advanced deployment automation features. Harness.io, on the other hand, specializes in automated deployments, providing robust rollout strategies, canary deployments, and advanced monitoring capabilities to ensure smooth application delivery.
  4. Enterprise Features: Google Cloud Build offers a cost-effective solution for smaller teams and startups, with basic features for CI/CD workflows. In comparison, Harness.io caters to enterprise customers, offering advanced security, compliance, and governance features to meet the needs of large-scale deployment environments.
  5. Community Support: Google Cloud Build benefits from Google's extensive community and documentation support, providing resources for developers to troubleshoot issues and optimize their CI/CD workflows. Harness.io also has a strong community following, with user forums, webinars, and support channels to assist users in implementing and utilizing the platform effectively.

In Summary, Google Cloud Build is more tightly integrated with Google Cloud Platform, offers simpler pipeline orchestration, and is suited for smaller teams, while Harness.io provides advanced deployment automation, enterprise features, and comprehensive community support for larger organizations.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Google Cloud Build
Pros of Harness.io
  • 2
    GCP easy integration
  • 2
    Container based
  • 1
    GitOps capability
  • 1
    Autostopping rules for Kubernetes clusters
  • 1
    Test Intelligence
  • 1
    Feature Flags
  • 1
    Cloud Cost Management
  • 1
    HIO monitor application health and help resolve issues

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Google Cloud Build
Cons of Harness.io
  • 2
    Vendor lock-in
  • 1
    Cost grows quickly

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Google Cloud Build?

Cloud Build lets you build software quickly across all languages. Get complete control over defining custom workflows for building, testing, and deploying across multiple environments such as VMs, serverless, Kubernetes, or Firebase.

What is Harness.io?

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention Google Cloud Build and Harness.io as a desired skillset
What companies use Google Cloud Build?
What companies use Harness.io?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Google Cloud Build?
What tools integrate with Harness.io?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Build and Harness.io?
Jenkins
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
CircleCI
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
GitLab
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.
GitHub Actions
It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.
See all alternatives