StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Go Modules Packages
  5. crc32 vs xxHash

crc32 vs xxHash

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

crc32
crc32
Stacks23
Followers0
Votes0
GitHub Stars73
Forks24
xxHash
xxHash
Stacks4
Followers0
Votes0
GitHub Stars57
Forks17

crc32 vs xxHash: What are the differences?

Key Differences between crc32 and xxHash

Introduction: In this article, we will discuss the key differences between crc32 and xxHash algorithms. Both crc32 and xxHash are popular hash functions used for generating fixed-size checksums or hash values. However, they differ in several aspects.

  1. Checksum Algorithm: The crc32 algorithm is a cyclic redundancy check algorithm that is widely used for error detection. It employs polynomial division to compute a checksum. On the other hand, xxHash is a non-cryptographic hash function that is known for its high performance and low collision rate. It uses a combination of bitwise operations and multiplication to produce a hash value.

  2. Speed: xxHash is generally faster than crc32. The xxHash algorithm is designed to take advantage of modern CPUs and memory architectures, making it highly efficient. It can generate hash values at a much higher speed compared to crc32, especially when processing large amounts of data.

  3. Collision Resistance: While crc32 is not designed to be collision-resistant, xxHash is more resistant to collisions. Collision resistance refers to the ability of a hash function to avoid generating the same hash value for different inputs. While xxHash is not completely collision-proof, it has a lower probability of producing hash collisions compared to crc32.

  4. Checksum Length: The crc32 algorithm generates a 32-bit checksum, which means that it produces a fixed-length hash value of 32 bits. On the other hand, xxHash can produce hash values of various lengths, including 32-bit, 64-bit, and 128-bit. This flexibility allows xxHash to be used in different scenarios where longer or shorter hash values are required.

  5. Implementation Complexity: The crc32 algorithm is relatively simple to implement and requires minimal computational resources. It can be easily implemented in hardware or software. In contrast, xxHash has a more complex implementation due to its optimization techniques for performance. While it is still feasible to implement xxHash, it may require more computational resources compared to crc32.

  6. Supported Platforms: crc32 is a widely supported algorithm and is available in many programming languages and platforms. It is a standard checksum algorithm used in various protocols and file formats. xxHash, on the other hand, may have limited availability in certain programming languages or platforms. However, it has gained popularity in recent years and is now supported in many programming languages.

In summary, crc32 and xxHash differ in terms of their algorithmic approach, speed, collision resistance, checksum length, implementation complexity, and availability in different programming languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

crc32
crc32
xxHash
xxHash

CRC32 hash with x64 optimizations.

Pure Go implementation of xxHash (32 and 64 bits versions).

Statistics
GitHub Stars
73
GitHub Stars
57
GitHub Forks
24
GitHub Forks
17
Stacks
23
Stacks
4
Followers
0
Followers
0
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to crc32, xxHash?

go

go

Google Cloud Client Libraries for Go.

proto

proto

Go support for Google's protocol buffers.

cloudflare

cloudflare

Cloudflare This package provides the package which offers an interface to the CloudFlare gAPI.

net

net

Go supplementary network libraries.

sys

sys

Go packages for low-level interaction with the operating system.

fsnotify

fsnotify

Cross-platform file system notifications for Go.

aws

aws

AWS SDK for the Go programming language.

text

text

Go text processing support.

assertion

assertion

Ginkgo's Preferred Matcher Library.

crypto

crypto

Go supplementary cryptography libraries.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase