Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Gitter vs RocketChat: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Gitter and RocketChat are both popular communication tools used in various organizations for collaboration and communication purposes. However, they have key differences that set them apart from each other.
Integration with Git platforms: Gitter is specifically designed to integrate seamlessly with Git platforms like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, allowing users to easily discuss and collaborate on code within their existing version control systems. On the other hand, RocketChat offers more general integrations with a wide range of platforms and tools, not limited to Git platforms, making it a versatile option for teams working on different types of projects.
Open-source vs. proprietary: Gitter is an open-source platform, meaning that its source code is freely available for anyone to view, modify, and contribute to. This openness allows for more customization and transparency in the development process. In contrast, RocketChat is a proprietary platform with a commercial licensing model, which may offer more advanced features and support but limits the ability for users to modify the underlying code.
Customization and scalability: RocketChat provides more extensive customization options and scalability features compared to Gitter. Users can create custom plugins, themes, and integrations in RocketChat to tailor the platform to their specific needs. Additionally, RocketChat is designed to handle larger teams and complex communication workflows more effectively, making it a better choice for organizations with growing communication needs.
User interface and experience: Gitter focuses on simplicity and ease of use, with a clean and intuitive user interface that makes it easy for users to start conversations and collaborate with their team members. RocketChat, on the other hand, offers a more feature-rich user experience with a wide range of communication tools like video conferencing, screen sharing, and file sharing, catering to teams with diverse collaboration requirements.
Security and compliance: RocketChat provides more robust security features and compliance options compared to Gitter. With features like end-to-end encryption, data retention policies, and compliance certifications, RocketChat is better equipped to meet the security and regulatory requirements of organizations in sensitive industries such as healthcare, finance, and government.
Community and support: Gitter has a dedicated community of developers and users who actively contribute to its development and provide support to fellow users. RocketChat, on the other hand, offers official support services and a larger user base, making it easier to find help and resources when needed. Additionally, RocketChat has a stronger ecosystem of third-party plugins and integrations, expanding its functionality and usability for users.
In Summary, Gitter and RocketChat have key differences in their integration with Git platforms, licensing model, customization and scalability options, user interface and experience, security and compliance features, and community support, making them suitable for different types of teams and organizations.
From a StackShare Community member: “We’re about to start a chat group for our open source project (over 5K stars on GitHub) so we can let our community collaborate more closely. The obvious choice would be Slack (k8s and a ton of major projects use it), but we’ve seen Gitter (webpack uses it) for a lot of open source projects, Discord (Vue.js moved to them), and as of late I’m seeing Spectrum more and more often. Does anyone have experience with these or other alternatives? Is it even worth assessing all these options, or should we just go with Slack? Some things that are important to us: free, all the regular integrations (GitHub, Heroku, etc), mobile & desktop apps, and open source is of course a plus."
We use Slack to increase productivity by simplifying communication and putting Slack in the middle of our communication workflow #Communications #Collaboration
We use Discord to tracking some action and errors (logs / alerting / assertion). it's free and simple to use with mobile application et notifications
We use Slack because we can let "tools talk to us" and automate processes in our dev team using bots.
Our Discord Server is our n°1 community stop; we gather feedback from our users from here, discuss about new features, announce new releases, and so on.
We even use it for internal meetings and calls !
Mattermost sports higher performance, uses Postgres, is a pure server side application not using up too much of system resources on the client side, and gives an overall enterprise grade impression in general.
Updates go smooth without a hassle, everything is organised logically, and the integration with the OS is absolutely stable. Apart from that, the underlying runtimes and code are mature, proven and stable.
The developers are maybe a bit more cautious in regard to introducing new features, but they maintain a stable experience, not breaking the codebase in order to hastily implement bells and whistles, which are not yet ready for production. Documentation and debugging are fantastic, so running this in enterprise production environment is absolutely approved of.
We chose RocketChat over other communications suites like Cliq or Slack mainly because we can self-host it on our own infrastructure. Since we have quite some projects going on which demand that we stay in touch with a lot of different stakeholders, pricing was an issue, too. With RocketChat, we have a huge set of features basically for free, RC offers apps for all major devices and systems and overall, we're very happy with it. The only downside is the limited amount of apps and integrations, but we can make due with what we have available.
Pros of Gitter
- Github integration63
- Free55
- Markdown support45
- Markdown19
- Graceful integration17
- Project-oriented16
- MARKDOOOOWN15
- IRC bridge12
- Integrates with everything9
- LaTeX8
- Apps available for most platforms4
- Cross-repository issue reference2
- Github login2
- IRC support1
- My new fav'rite thing is on it1
- Very fast work1
- Very open1
- Now open source1
- Open source1
- Free unlimited archives1
- Open access (no invitation needed)1
- Single account for all communities1
- Free, open & free hosting1
Pros of RocketChat
- Open source72
- Can be deployed on premise38
- Byos (bring your own server)32
- Faster than Slack30
- Mobile app for iphone, ipad, and ipod touch21
- Built using meteor19
- Desktop client for mac and windows19
- Easily deployed on Cloud Services (Heroku, etc)13
- Screen Sharing10
- Video and audio9
- Excellent support & service, bar-none9
- Web client6
- Amazing product, fast moving development, and BYOS5
- Multiple Security integrations - LDAP etc5
- Docker Image for easy setup5
- Open source5
- Mobile app for android phone, tablet, and tv stick5
- Datacontrol4
- Great development team4
- Free4
- Love it - running on R Pi 22
- Open source server2
- Broadcast & Readonly channels1
- Slack bridge1
- Linux Client Support1
- Flexible Integrations1
- Ldap integration1
- Threading model0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Gitter
- Sends data to US Gov2
Cons of RocketChat
- No full markdown support1
- Mobile app in Enterprise version only1
- Many basic features require plugins1
- Visioconference support is external1
- No screen recorder1
- Few options for user customization1
- Limited message history on SaaS1
- Poor user customization1
- Hard to upgrade1
- Not as well-known as others like it1