StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. GitLab vs Shippable

GitLab vs Shippable

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Shippable
Shippable
Stacks62
Followers53
Votes128
GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

GitLab vs Shippable: What are the differences?

Introduction: GitLab and Shippable are both popular tools used in the DevOps and software development industry. While they have similarities in their core functions, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Integration with DevOps Tools: GitLab provides a comprehensive suite of tools for the entire software development lifecycle including version control, issue tracking, CI/CD pipelines, and more. On the other hand, Shippable focuses mainly on CI/CD pipelines and lacks the extensive features for project management and collaboration that GitLab offers.

  2. Pricing Model: GitLab offers both a self-hosted open-source version as well as a cloud-based SaaS offering. The open-source version allows for greater customization and control over the platform while the cloud-based option simplifies management. Shippable, however, primarily operates on a cloud-based SaaS model with pricing based on the number of concurrent pipelines, potentially making it more cost-effective for smaller teams.

  3. Community Support: GitLab has a larger and more active community compared to Shippable. This means that users of GitLab have more resources, tutorials, and forums to seek help and guidance from. Shippable, being a smaller player in the market, may have limited community support available.

  4. Ease of Use and Learning Curve: GitLab has a slightly steeper learning curve compared to Shippable due to its extensive features and functionalities. While GitLab offers more customization options and flexibility, it may require more time to fully understand and utilize all its capabilities. Shippable, with its focus on CI/CD pipelines, may be easier to get started with for teams looking for a more straightforward solution.

  5. Security Features: GitLab places a strong emphasis on security and offers advanced features such as security scanning tools and security alerts to help users identify and mitigate vulnerabilities in their code. Shippable also prioritizes security but may not offer the same level of depth and sophistication in its security features as GitLab does.

  6. Scalability and Performance: GitLab is known for its ability to scale effectively, supporting large enterprise teams with complex projects. Its robust architecture allows for high performance and reliability even as the project size grows. Shippable, while efficient for smaller to medium-sized teams, may face limitations in scalability when handling larger projects with higher demands.

In Summary, GitLab and Shippable vary in their integration capabilities, pricing models, community support, ease of use, security features, and scalability, making them suitable for different types of teams and projects in the software development space.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Shippable, GitLab

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Shippable
Shippable
GitLab
GitLab

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

1-Click Setup;Docker Containers;Responsive UI;Flexible Configuration;Matrix Builds;Intelligent Notifications;Team Permissions; Container caching; Bring Your Own Host; Docker Registry
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
62
Stacks
63.4K
Followers
53
Followers
54.5K
Votes
128
Votes
2.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 18
    Free private repositories
  • 16
    Built on docker
  • 14
    Continuous deployment
  • 13
    Bitbucket integration
  • 12
    Fastest continuous integration and deployment
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Integrations
Heroku
Heroku
Slack
Slack
HipChat
HipChat
Docker
Docker
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitHub
GitHub
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Shippable, GitLab?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana