StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitLab vs Harness.io

GitLab vs Harness.io

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Harness.io
Harness.io
Stacks58
Followers120
Votes6

GitLab vs Harness.io: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitLab and Harness.io are two popular tools used in the software development lifecycle. While GitLab is a complete DevOps platform, Harness.io focuses on continuous delivery and deployment. Below are the key differences between these two tools:

1. Integration and Extensibility: GitLab offers a wide range of integrations with various tools like Jira, Jenkins, Kubernetes, and more, providing a seamless experience for developers. On the other hand, Harness.io has fewer integrations available, limiting the extensibility of the platform.

2. Deployment and Release Strategies: GitLab provides a comprehensive set of features for managing deployments and different release strategies, such as canary deployments, rolling deployments, blue/green deployments, and more. In contrast, Harness.io specializes in continuous delivery and offers advanced features like AI/ML-based canary analysis and automated rollback.

3. Pipeline Orchestration: GitLab has a robust pipeline orchestration capability that allows developers to define complex CI/CD pipelines using a YAML configuration file. With GitLab, developers have more control and flexibility in defining their pipelines. In contrast, Harness.io offers a simplified pipeline setup with a drag-and-drop interface, making it easier for less technical users to create and modify pipelines.

4. Monitoring and Observability: GitLab provides basic monitoring and observability capabilities through its built-in metrics dashboard and logging functionality. In comparison, Harness.io offers more advanced observability features, including real-time monitoring, log aggregation, distributed tracing, and integration with popular observability tools like Datadog and New Relic.

5. Team Collaboration: GitLab has extensive collaboration features, including Git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, and wiki documentation. It provides a centralized platform for the entire development team to collaborate effectively. Harness.io, on the other hand, focuses more on the deployment and delivery aspects, with limited collaboration features.

6. Infrastructure Provisioning and Management: GitLab allows developers to provision and manage infrastructure resources using tools like Kubernetes, AWS, and GCP. It provides native integration with cloud providers and container orchestration platforms. In contrast, Harness.io primarily focuses on the continuous delivery process and does not offer infrastructure provisioning capabilities.

In summary, GitLab is a comprehensive DevOps platform with extensive integration options, pipeline orchestration, collaboration features, and infrastructure management capabilities. On the other hand, Harness.io specializes in continuous delivery and deployment, offering advanced release strategies, observability features, and a simplified pipeline setup.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, Harness.io

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
Harness.io
Harness.io

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
ML-based Continuous Verification; Continuous Insights; Continuous Security; Advanced Deployment Strategies; Cloud & Container Cost Visibility; Cloud Cost Event Correlation; Detailed cost analysis without manual tagging
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
58
Followers
54.5K
Followers
120
Votes
2.5K
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 1
    Test Intelligence
  • 1
    Feature Flags
  • 1
    HIO monitor application health and help resolve issues
  • 1
    Autostopping rules for Kubernetes clusters
  • 1
    Cloud Cost Management
Cons
  • 1
    Cost grows quickly
Integrations
No integrations available
New Relic
New Relic
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Splunk
Splunk
Jenkins
Jenkins
Datadog
Datadog

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Harness.io?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana