StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Gerrit Code Review vs Travis CI

Gerrit Code Review vs Travis CI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Travis CI
Travis CI
Stacks28.0K
Followers6.7K
Votes1.7K
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67

Gerrit Code Review vs Travis CI: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Gerrit Code Review and Travis CI

Gerrit Code Review is a code review tool used primarily for reviewing source code changes before they are merged into the main codebase, ensuring better code quality, whereas Travis CI is a continuous integration tool used for testing and building software projects, ensuring code stability and quality.

1. **Integration**: Gerrit Code Review integrates directly with Git repositories, allowing developers to submit, review, and merge code changes within the same platform, while Travis CI integrates with version control systems like GitHub or Bitbucket to automatically build and test code changes.

2. **Code Review Process**: In Gerrit, code reviews are performed by peers who provide feedback on the proposed changes, leading to more comprehensive and detailed reviews, whereas Travis CI focuses on automating the testing process and providing feedback on the build status based on predefined criteria.

3. **User Interface**: Gerrit Code Review offers a web-based interface for code reviews, with features like inline commenting and detailed change history, providing a more interactive and collaborative review process, while Travis CI provides a dashboard view of build statuses and logs, focusing more on the automation aspect of testing.

4. **Workflow Management**: Gerrit Code Review allows for custom workflows with multiple code review stages and permissions settings, offering flexibility in managing the code review process for different projects, whereas Travis CI follows a predefined build pipeline workflow, making it easier to set up and use for continuous integration tasks.

5. **Notification System**: Gerrit Code Review notifies users about code changes, reviews, and approvals through email notifications, keeping users informed about the progress of code reviews and merge requests, while Travis CI notifies users about build statuses and failures through email or chat notifications, helping teams to address issues promptly.

6. **Deployment Options**: Gerrit Code Review is primarily used for reviewing code changes and does not focus on deployment tasks, whereas Travis CI can be configured to automate deployment tasks along with testing and building, providing a more integrated continuous integration and deployment solution.

In Summary, Gerrit Code Review and Travis CI differ in their focus on code review vs. continuous integration, integration methods, code review processes, user interfaces, workflow management, notification systems, and deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Travis CI, Gerrit Code Review

Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Travis CI
Travis CI
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Easy Setup- Getting started with Travis CI is as easy as enabling a project, adding basic build instructions to your project and committing code.;Supports Your Platform- Lots of databases and services are pre-installed and can simply be enabled in your build configuration, we'll launch them for you automatically. MySQL, PostgreSQL, ElasticSearch, Redis, Riak, RabbitMQ, Memcached are available by default.;Deploy With Confidence- Deploying to production after a successful build is as easy as setting up a bit of configuration, and we'll deploy your code to Heroku, Engine Yard Cloud, Nodejitsu, cloudControl, OpenShift, and CloudFoundry.
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
Stacks
28.0K
Stacks
116
Followers
6.7K
Followers
223
Votes
1.7K
Votes
67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 506
    Github integration
  • 388
    Free for open source
  • 271
    Easy to get started
  • 191
    Nice interface
  • 162
    Automatic deployment
Cons
  • 8
    Can't be hosted insternally
  • 3
    Feature lacking
  • 3
    Unstable
  • 2
    Incomplete documentation for all platforms
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
  • 10
    Open source
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Heroku
Heroku
AWS CodeDeploy
AWS CodeDeploy
MySQL
MySQL
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Nodejitsu
Nodejitsu
npm
npm
GitHub
GitHub
Engine Yard Cloud
Engine Yard Cloud
cloudControl
cloudControl
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to Travis CI, Gerrit Code Review?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana