StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Gerrit Code Review vs SonarQube

Gerrit Code Review vs SonarQube

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SonarQube
SonarQube
Stacks1.9K
Followers2.0K
Votes53
GitHub Stars10.0K
Forks2.1K
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67

Gerrit Code Review vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Gerrit Code Review and SonarQube, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Architecture: Gerrit Code Review is a web-based code review tool that integrates tightly with Git, allowing for seamless code review workflows. SonarQube, on the other hand, is a platform that performs static code analysis, providing insights and metrics on the quality of the codebase.

  2. Code Review vs Quality Analysis: Gerrit Code Review primarily focuses on facilitating the code review process, enabling developers to collaboratively review and make decisions on code changes. SonarQube, however, is centered around analyzing the quality and maintaining the security and reliability of the code through its analysis and reporting features.

  3. Real-time Collaboration: Gerrit Code Review provides a real-time collaboration feature, allowing developers to review code changes concurrently and provide feedback. SonarQube, on the contrary, does not emphasize real-time collaboration and focuses more on providing automated analysis and reporting.

  4. Integration with Version Control Systems: Gerrit Code Review smoothly integrates with Git as its version control system, including features like branch management, change tracking, and repository browsing. SonarQube supports multiple version control systems but primarily focuses on analyzing code from various branching strategies and repositories, rather than managing them directly.

  5. Scope of Analysis: Gerrit Code Review primarily targets code changes made within a specific Git branch, aiming to ensure the quality and maintainability of the codebase during the review process. SonarQube, however, analyzes the entire codebase, providing comprehensive insights into its quality and identifying potential vulnerabilities or code smells.

  6. Customizability and Extensibility: Gerrit Code Review offers extensive customizability, allowing organizations to adapt its review process to their specific needs and preferences. On the other hand, SonarQube focuses more on providing a standardized set of rules and analysis capabilities, with limited customization options.

In summary, Gerrit Code Review is a web-based tool for collaborative code review and version control management, while SonarQube is a platform for static code analysis and quality reporting across the entire codebase. Their key differences lie in their primary focus (code review vs. quality analysis), real-time collaboration capabilities, integration with version control systems, scope of analysis, and customizability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube
SonarQube
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
116
Followers
2.0K
Followers
223
Votes
53
Votes
67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Tracks code complexity and smell trends
  • 16
    IDE Integration
  • 9
    Complete code Review
  • 2
    Difficult to deploy
Cons
  • 7
    Sales process is long and unfriendly
  • 7
    Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful
  • 1
    Does not integrate with Snyk
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Open source
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
Integrations
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
TeamCity
TeamCity
Appveyor
Appveyor
Travis CI
Travis CI
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Bamboo
Bamboo
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, Gerrit Code Review?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

bitHound

bitHound

With faster deployment cycles, a hundred competing priorities and tight deadlines to juggle– your team has a lot on their plate. Uncover and focus on the critical issues impacting your team, avoid software pitfalls and ship with confidence.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana