StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Flynn vs OpenShift

Flynn vs OpenShift

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Stacks1.6K
Followers1.4K
Votes517
GitHub Stars885
Forks510
Flynn
Flynn
Stacks14
Followers48
Votes16
GitHub Stars7.9K
Forks592

Flynn vs OpenShift: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Flynn and OpenShift

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Architecture**: Flynn is designed to be a platform-agnostic open-source PaaS system built on Docker containers and CoreOS, while OpenShift is a container application platform that supports Docker and Kubernetes.
2. **Configurability**: Flynn provides less configurability out-of-the-box compared to OpenShift and requires more manual setup and configuration for specific use cases.
3. **Scaling**: OpenShift offers more advanced scaling options and features compared to Flynn, allowing for more efficient utilization of resources and better performance in high-load environments.
4. **Community Support**: OpenShift has a larger and more active community of users and contributors compared to Flynn, leading to quicker updates, bug fixes, and a wider range of available resources.
5. **Enterprise Focus**: OpenShift is developed and maintained by a major enterprise software company, Red Hat, providing better support and integration with enterprise systems and services compared to Flynn.
6. **Pricing Model**: OpenShift offers both free and enterprise versions, with more advanced features and support available in the paid versions, whereas Flynn relies more on community support and does not have as many enterprise-level features in its free version.

In Summary, Flynn and OpenShift differ in terms of their architecture, configurability, scaling capabilities, community support, enterprise focus, and pricing models, making each platform suitable for different use cases and environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Flynn
Flynn

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Flynn lets you deploy apps with git push and containers. Developers can deploy any app to any cluster in seconds.

Built-in support for Node.js, Ruby, Python, PHP, Perl, and Java (the standard in today's Enterprise);OpenShift is extensible with a customizable cartridge functionality that allows developers to add any other language they wish. We've seen everything from Clojure to Cobol running on OpenShift;OpenShift supports frameworks ranging from Spring, to Rails, to Play;Autoscaling- OpenShift can scale your application by adding additional instances of your application and enabling clustering. Alternatively, you can manually scale the amount of resources with which your application is deployed when needed;OpenShift by Red Hat is built on open-source technologies (Red Hat Enterprise Linux- RHEL);One Click Deployment- Deploying to the OpenShift platform is as easy a clicking a button or entering a "Git push" command
Flynn goes beyond 12 factor apps. Run any Linux process written in any language or framework, even stateful apps on your own servers or any public cloud.;Scaling or adding a new cluster is simple: just add more nodes. Everything is containerized, Flynn takes care of distributing work across the cluster.;Flynn is 100% free and open source. Flynn works great out of the box, and since Flynn is modular and API-driven it's easy to modify and swap components to suit your needs.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
885
GitHub Stars
7.9K
GitHub Forks
510
GitHub Forks
592
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
14
Followers
1.4K
Followers
48
Votes
517
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 99
    Good free plan
  • 63
    Open Source
  • 47
    Easy setup
  • 43
    Nodejs support
  • 42
    Well documented
Cons
  • 2
    Decisions are made for you, limiting your options
  • 2
    License cost
  • 1
    Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams
Pros
  • 6
    Free
  • 5
    Supports few types of containers:libvirt-lxc, docker
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 2
    PostgreSQL HA
  • 1
    12-factor methodology
Integrations
No integrations available
Scala
Scala
Rails
Rails
Ruby
Ruby
Clojure
Clojure
Grails
Grails
Java
Java
Golang
Golang
Django
Django
PHP
PHP
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to Red Hat OpenShift, Flynn?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase