StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Flocker vs Tutum

Flocker vs Tutum

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Tutum
Tutum
Stacks61
Followers74
Votes235
Flocker
Flocker
Stacks12
Followers59
Votes15
GitHub Stars3.4K
Forks288

Flocker vs Tutum: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Flocker and Tutum are outlined below:

1. **Data Migration**: Flocker allows stateful containers to migrate data along with the container itself, enabling seamless movement of applications between hosts without data loss. Tutum, on the other hand, focuses more on managing the deployment and scaling of containerized applications rather than addressing data migration specifically.
   
2. **Monitoring and Logging**: Flocker offers built-in support for monitoring and logging of containerized applications, providing insights into the performance and health of the containers. Tutum, while offering monitoring capabilities, may rely on third-party tools for advanced logging and monitoring features.
   
3. **Orchestration**: Flocker is primarily designed for data management and container orchestration, ensuring data persistence and accessibility across different hosts. In contrast, Tutum emphasizes container orchestration and cluster management, focusing on scalability and resource allocation for applications within a cluster.
   
4. **Compatibility**: Flocker is compatible with various container orchestrators, including Kubernetes and Docker Swarm, making it versatile for different infrastructure setups. Tutum is a cloud-hosted platform that integrates with Docker Cloud, providing a streamlined workflow for managing container deployments in a cloud environment.
   
5. **Security**: Flocker places an emphasis on security by offering encryption for data transfer and storage within containers, ensuring data protection and privacy. Tutum also prioritizes security measures but may rely on cloud provider security features for certain aspects of container management.
   
6. **Community Support**: Flocker has an active community with ongoing development and support for users, contributing to the growth and enhancement of the platform. Tutum, being a Docker product, benefits from the larger Docker community but may have different focus areas for community engagement and support.

In Summary, the key differences between Flocker and Tutum revolve around data migration capabilities, monitoring and logging features, orchestration focus, compatibility with container orchestrators, security measures, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tutum
Tutum
Flocker
Flocker

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Deploy from Docker Hub; Free private Docker registry; CLI Tool; Private Links; Dynamic Links; RESTful API; Edit & Redeploy; Jumpstarts & Quickstarts; Webhooks; Bring your own node; Data volumes; Amazon Web Services; Digital Ocean; Microsoft Azure;
Move containers and their data together between hosts Run multiple containers on multiple machines Define your application as a set of connected containers Easily move between dev, staging and production
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
288
Stacks
61
Stacks
12
Followers
74
Followers
59
Votes
235
Votes
15
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 35
    Awesome user interface
  • 28
    Free private docker registry
  • 24
    Its super easy
  • 24
    Docker public index integration
  • 21
    Friendly support
Pros
  • 4
    Open-Source
  • 3
    Easily manage Docker containers with Data
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Great support from their team
  • 2
    Multi-host docker-compose support
Integrations
Docker
Docker
MongoDB
MongoDB
MariaDB
MariaDB
MySQL
MySQL
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Memcached
Memcached
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Riak
Riak
WordPress
WordPress
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Amazon EBS
Amazon EBS
Docker
Docker
Mesosphere
Mesosphere
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
CoreOS
CoreOS

What are some alternatives to Tutum, Flocker?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Docker Machine

Docker Machine

Machine lets you create Docker hosts on your computer, on cloud providers, and inside your own data center. It creates servers, installs Docker on them, then configures the Docker client to talk to them.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana