StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Apache Flink vs Impala

Apache Flink vs Impala

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Impala
Apache Impala
Stacks145
Followers301
Votes18
GitHub Stars34
Forks33
Apache Flink
Apache Flink
Stacks534
Followers879
Votes38
GitHub Stars25.4K
Forks13.7K

Apache Flink vs Impala: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Apache Flink and Impala are two popular data processing frameworks with distinct characteristics. Below are the key differences between Apache Flink and Impala.

1. **Processing Model**:
Apache Flink is a stream processing framework that supports both batch and real-time data processing, while Impala is primarily designed for ad-hoc SQL queries on Hadoop data. Flink processes data in a continuous and event-driven manner, whereas Impala is more suitable for interactive and fast SQL queries on structured data.

2. **Latency**:
Apache Flink is known for its low latency and high throughput processing capabilities, making it suitable for real-time applications with strict latency requirements. On the other hand, Impala may have higher latency due to its architecture optimized for ad-hoc queries, which can impact real-time processing performance.

3. **State Management**:
Apache Flink provides native support for state management, enabling complex event processing and fault tolerance mechanisms. In contrast, Impala does not have built-in state management capabilities, limiting its ability to handle complex stateful computations efficiently.

4. **Programming Language**:
Apache Flink supports multiple programming languages such as Java, Scala, and Python, offering flexibility to developers in choosing their preferred language for writing data processing applications. Impala, on the other hand, primarily uses SQL for querying data stored in Hadoop, which may limit the options for developers to use other languages for data processing.

5. **Optimization Techniques**:
Apache Flink employs various optimization techniques such as operator fusion, query optimization, and dynamic resource allocation to enhance performance and efficiency in processing large-scale data sets. Impala focuses more on query optimization and execution planning to speed up SQL queries but may lack the comprehensive optimization techniques offered by Flink.

6. **Compatibility**:
Apache Flink is compatible with a wide range of data sources and systems, including Hadoop, Kafka, and other streaming platforms, providing seamless integration with existing data infrastructure. In comparison, Impala is tightly integrated with Hadoop ecosystem components like HDFS and Hive, which may limit its interoperability with non-Hadoop data sources and systems.

In Summary, Apache Flink and Impala differ in their processing models, latency characteristics, state management capabilities, programming language support, optimization techniques, and compatibility with external systems and data sources.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Impala, Apache Flink

Krishna Chaitanya
Krishna Chaitanya

Head of Technology at Adonmo

Jun 27, 2021

Review

For such a more realtime-focused, data-centered application like an exchange, it's not the frontend or backend that matter much. In fact for that, they can do away with any of the popular frameworks like React/Vue/Angular for the frontend and Go/Python for the backend. For example uniswap's frontend (although much simpler than binance) is built in React. The main interesting part here would be how they are able to handle updating data so quickly. In my opinion, they might be heavily reliant on realtime processing systems like Kafka+Kafka Streams, Apache Flink or Apache Spark Stream or similar. For more processing heavy but not so real-time processing, they might be relying on OLAP and/or warehousing tools like Cassandra/Redshift. They could have also optimized few high frequent queries using NoSQL stores like mongodb (for persistance) and in-memory cache like Redis (for further perfomance boost to get millisecond latencies).

53.8k views53.8k
Comments
Nilesh
Nilesh

Technical Architect at Self Employed

Jul 8, 2020

Needs adviceonElasticsearchElasticsearchKafkaKafka

We have a Kafka topic having events of type A and type B. We need to perform an inner join on both type of events using some common field (primary-key). The joined events to be inserted in Elasticsearch.

In usual cases, type A and type B events (with same key) observed to be close upto 15 minutes. But in some cases they may be far from each other, lets say 6 hours. Sometimes event of either of the types never come.

In all cases, we should be able to find joined events instantly after they are joined and not-joined events within 15 minutes.

576k views576k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Impala
Apache Impala
Apache Flink
Apache Flink

Impala is a modern, open source, MPP SQL query engine for Apache Hadoop. Impala is shipped by Cloudera, MapR, and Amazon. With Impala, you can query data, whether stored in HDFS or Apache HBase – including SELECT, JOIN, and aggregate functions – in real time.

Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.

Do BI-style Queries on Hadoop;Unify Your Infrastructure;Implement Quickly;Count on Enterprise-class Security;Retain Freedom from Lock-in;Expand the Hadoop User-verse
Hybrid batch/streaming runtime that supports batch processing and data streaming programs.;Custom memory management to guarantee efficient, adaptive, and highly robust switching between in-memory and data processing out-of-core algorithms.;Flexible and expressive windowing semantics for data stream programs;Built-in program optimizer that chooses the proper runtime operations for each program;Custom type analysis and serialization stack for high performance
Statistics
GitHub Stars
34
GitHub Stars
25.4K
GitHub Forks
33
GitHub Forks
13.7K
Stacks
145
Stacks
534
Followers
301
Followers
879
Votes
18
Votes
38
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Super fast
  • 1
    Load Balancing
  • 1
    High Performance
  • 1
    Massively Parallel Processing
  • 1
    Open Sourse
Pros
  • 16
    Unified batch and stream processing
  • 8
    Easy to use streaming apis
  • 8
    Out-of-the box connector to kinesis,s3,hdfs
  • 4
    Open Source
  • 2
    Low latency
Integrations
Hadoop
Hadoop
Mode
Mode
Redash
Redash
Apache Kudu
Apache Kudu
YARN Hadoop
YARN Hadoop
Hadoop
Hadoop
HBase
HBase
Kafka
Kafka

What are some alternatives to Apache Impala, Apache Flink?

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

lakeFS

lakeFS

It is an open-source data version control system for data lakes. It provides a “Git for data” platform enabling you to implement best practices from software engineering on your data lake, including branching and merging, CI/CD, and production-like dev/test environments.

Druid

Druid

Druid is a distributed, column-oriented, real-time analytics data store that is commonly used to power exploratory dashboards in multi-tenant environments. Druid excels as a data warehousing solution for fast aggregate queries on petabyte sized data sets. Druid supports a variety of flexible filters, exact calculations, approximate algorithms, and other useful calculations.

Apache Kylin

Apache Kylin

Apache Kylin™ is an open source Distributed Analytics Engine designed to provide SQL interface and multi-dimensional analysis (OLAP) on Hadoop/Spark supporting extremely large datasets, originally contributed from eBay Inc.

Splunk

Splunk

It provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use it to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data.

Vertica

Vertica

It provides a best-in-class, unified analytics platform that will forever be independent from underlying infrastructure.

Azure Synapse

Azure Synapse

It is an analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics. It gives you the freedom to query data on your terms, using either serverless on-demand or provisioned resources—at scale. It brings these two worlds together with a unified experience to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for immediate BI and machine learning needs.

Apache Kudu

Apache Kudu

A new addition to the open source Apache Hadoop ecosystem, Kudu completes Hadoop's storage layer to enable fast analytics on fast data.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase