Flask vs Zope

Overview

Flask

Stacks19.3K

Followers16.2K

Votes60

Zope

Stacks175

Followers14

Votes1

GitHub Stars377

Forks106

Flask vs Zope: What are the differences?

Architecture: Flask follows a minimalist design philosophy, providing basic functionalities for web development without unnecessary features. On the other hand, Zope is a more comprehensive framework that includes a wide range of built-in tools and components for building complex web applications.
Community Support: Flask has a large and active community of developers who contribute plugins, extensions, and documentation to help users build web applications more efficiently. In contrast, Zope has a smaller but dedicated community that focuses on maintaining the framework and providing support to users.
Ease of Use: Flask is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a popular choice for beginners and small projects. Zope, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and complex architecture, making it more suitable for experienced developers and larger applications.
Flexibility: Flask provides developers with more flexibility and control over the structure and components of their web applications, allowing for customization and integration with other tools and libraries. Zope, on the other hand, has a more rigid and opinionated approach to web development, which can limit flexibility but also streamline the development process.
Scalability: Flask is well-suited for building lightweight and scalable web applications that can handle a moderate amount of traffic. Zope, on the other hand, is designed for building enterprise-level applications that require high performance, scalability, and robustness to handle heavy loads and complex business logic.
Documentation: Flask is known for its extensive and well-organized documentation, which makes it easy for developers to get started and find answers to common questions. In comparison, Zope's documentation is more fragmented and less user-friendly, requiring users to rely more on community resources and forums for support.

In Summary, Flask is a lightweight and flexible web framework with a focus on simplicity and ease of use, while Zope is a comprehensive web application server designed for building complex and scalable web applications with a more rigid and opinionated architecture.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Flask, Zope

Kristan Eres

Senior Solutions Analyst

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceon

Django

Python

Flask

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

392k views392k

Comments

Saurav

Application Devloper at Bny Mellon

Mar 27, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.
Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.
Support for swagger/ OpenAPI
Support for JSON Web Token
Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

337k views337k

Comments

Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Python

Nameko

RabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flask	Zope
Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.	It is a family of free and open-source web application servers written in Python, and their associated online community. It stands for "Z Object Publishing Environment", and was the first system using the now common object publishing methodology for the Web
-	Easy to use; Specific; Reusable
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 377
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 106
Stacks 19.3K	Stacks 175
Followers 16.2K	Followers 14
Votes 60	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 For it flexibility 9 Flexibilty and easy to use 7 User friendly 6 Secured 5 Unopinionated Cons 10 Not JS 7 Context 5 Not fast 1 Don't has many module as in spring	Pros 1 For using Plone CMS
Integrations
No integrations available	Python EasyEngine Plesk Scalyr Datadog Tarantool OpenResty

What are some alternatives to Flask, Zope?

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Related Comparisons

Flask vs Zope: What are the differences?

Architecture: Flask follows a minimalist design philosophy, providing basic functionalities for web development without unnecessary features. On the other hand, Zope is a more comprehensive framework that includes a wide range of built-in tools and components for building complex web applications.
Community Support: Flask has a large and active community of developers who contribute plugins, extensions, and documentation to help users build web applications more efficiently. In contrast, Zope has a smaller but dedicated community that focuses on maintaining the framework and providing support to users.
Ease of Use: Flask is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a popular choice for beginners and small projects. Zope, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and complex architecture, making it more suitable for experienced developers and larger applications.
Flexibility: Flask provides developers with more flexibility and control over the structure and components of their web applications, allowing for customization and integration with other tools and libraries. Zope, on the other hand, has a more rigid and opinionated approach to web development, which can limit flexibility but also streamline the development process.
Scalability: Flask is well-suited for building lightweight and scalable web applications that can handle a moderate amount of traffic. Zope, on the other hand, is designed for building enterprise-level applications that require high performance, scalability, and robustness to handle heavy loads and complex business logic.
Documentation: Flask is known for its extensive and well-organized documentation, which makes it easy for developers to get started and find answers to common questions. In comparison, Zope's documentation is more fragmented and less user-friendly, requiring users to rely more on community resources and forums for support.

Flask vs Zope

Overview