StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Flask vs Semantic UI

Flask vs Semantic UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flask
Flask
Stacks19.3K
Followers16.2K
Votes60
Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Stacks992
Followers1.5K
Votes673
GitHub Stars51.2K
Forks4.9K

Flask vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: Flask is a lightweight and flexible micro web framework for Python programming language, allowing developers to build web applications quickly. On the other hand, Semantic UI is a front-end development framework that provides a set of CSS and JavaScript components for easy web design. While Flask handles the back-end logic and server-side operations, Semantic UI focuses primarily on the front-end design and user interface of web applications.

  2. Language: Flask is based on Python, a powerful and versatile programming language known for its readability and ease of use. Semantic UI, on the other hand, is based on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, the standard languages for front-end web development. This difference in languages reflects the primary focus of Flask on back-end functionality and Semantic UI on front-end design.

  3. Functionality: Flask offers a wide range of features and extensions for server-side development, such as routing, request handling, and template rendering. Semantic UI, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive library of pre-designed components and themes for creating responsive and visually appealing web interfaces. The key difference lies in the purpose and functionality of these tools, with Flask focused on server-side logic and Semantic UI on front-end aesthetics.

  4. Customization: Flask allows developers to customize and extend the functionality of their web applications by integrating various Flask extensions and libraries. Semantic UI, on the other hand, offers a high level of customization through its flexible grid system, theming options, and component variations. Developers can easily modify the appearance and behavior of their web interfaces using Semantic UI classes and variables.

  5. Community Support: Flask has a large and active community of developers who contribute to the framework by creating extensions, plugins, and documentation. Semantic UI also benefits from a strong community of designers and developers who share templates, themes, and resources for using the framework effectively. Both Flask and Semantic UI offer extensive support and resources for beginners and experienced developers alike.

  6. Learning Curve: Flask is relatively easy to learn for Python developers, as it follows a simple and intuitive structure for building web applications. Semantic UI, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its extensive collection of classes, components, and customization options. Developers with a strong foundation in HTML, CSS, and JavaScript may find it easier to work with Semantic UI.

In Summary, Flask and Semantic UI serve different purposes in web development, with Flask focusing on server-side functionality and back-end logic, while Semantic UI specializes in front-end design and user interface components.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Flask, Semantic UI

Kristan Eres
Kristan Eres

Senior Solutions Analyst

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoPythonPythonFlaskFlask

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

392k views392k
Comments
Saurav
Saurav

Application Devloper at Bny Mellon

Mar 27, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

  • Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.

  • Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.

  • Support for swagger/ OpenAPI

  • Support for JSON Web Token

  • Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

337k views337k
Comments
Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flask
Flask
Semantic UI
Semantic UI

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

-
Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
51.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
Stacks
19.3K
Stacks
992
Followers
16.2K
Followers
1.5K
Votes
60
Votes
673
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 7
    User friendly
  • 6
    Secured
  • 5
    Unopinionated
Cons
  • 10
    Not JS
  • 7
    Context
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 1
    Don't has many module as in spring
Pros
  • 157
    Easy to use and looks elegant
  • 92
    Variety of components
  • 64
    Themes
  • 61
    Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use
  • 57
    Semantic, duh
Cons
  • 5
    Outdated build tool (gulp 3))
  • 3
    Poor accessibility support
  • 3
    HTML is not semantic (see list component)
  • 2
    Javascript is tied to jquery
Integrations
No integrations available
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Ember.js
Ember.js
Meteor
Meteor

What are some alternatives to Flask, Semantic UI?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase