Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Firebase

40.5K
34.3K
+ 1
2K
Firebase Authentication

515
596
+ 1
55
Add tool

Firebase vs Firebase Authentication: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of mobile and web application development, Firebase and Firebase Authentication are tools offered by Google to facilitate backend development and user authentication processes. While both are part of the Firebase suite, they serve distinct purposes and have key differences that developers should be aware of.

  1. Database vs. Authentication: The primary difference between Firebase and Firebase Authentication lies in their core functionalities. Firebase is mainly focused on providing a real-time NoSQL database for storing and syncing data, while Firebase Authentication is specifically designed for handling user authentication and authorization processes within the application.

  2. Data Management vs. User Verification: Firebase allows developers to store, sync, and query application data in real-time, making it ideal for managing complex data structures. On the other hand, Firebase Authentication enables developers to easily implement user sign-up, sign-in, and other authentication mechanisms, ensuring secure access control to the application's features.

  3. Real-time Updates vs. User Profiles: With Firebase, developers can establish real-time connections to the database, enabling instant updates and synchronization across all connected clients. In contrast, Firebase Authentication focuses on managing user profiles, permissions, and user sessions to authenticate and authorize users securely.

  4. Scalability vs. User Experience: Firebase's database is designed to scale effortlessly as the application grows, allowing for seamless handling of large amounts of data and user interactions. Firebase Authentication, on the other hand, prioritizes providing a smooth user experience by simplifying the authentication process and ensuring user data security.

  5. Integration Flexibility: Another key difference is in the integration flexibility offered by Firebase and Firebase Authentication. While Firebase can be seamlessly integrated with other Firebase services for a comprehensive backend solution, Firebase Authentication can also be integrated with external identity providers like Google, Facebook, or Apple for a more versatile authentication process.

  6. Cost Considerations: Firebase and Firebase Authentication also differ in terms of cost implications for developers. While Firebase offers a generous free tier for its services, including the database, Firebase Authentication may incur additional costs based on the number of authentications and other factors, making it essential for developers to consider budget constraints.

In Summary, Firebase focuses on database management and real-time data synchronization, while Firebase Authentication specializes in user authentication and identity management, offering developers a comprehensive toolkit for building secure and scalable applications.

Advice on Firebase and Firebase Authentication
Needs advice
on
ApolloApolloFirebaseFirebase
and
Socket.IOSocket.IO

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

See more
Replies (3)
Timothy Malstead
Junior Full Stack Developer at Freelance · | 7 upvotes · 460.5K views
Recommends
on
FirebaseFirebase

I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.

The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.

Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.

Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.

See more
Recommends
on
AblyAbly

Hello Noam 👋,

I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.

Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase

See more
Recommends
on
8base8base

Hey Noam,

I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.

Thanks, Ilya

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Firebase
Pros of Firebase Authentication
  • 371
    Realtime backend made easy
  • 270
    Fast and responsive
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 215
    Real-time
  • 191
    JSON
  • 134
    Free
  • 128
    Backed by google
  • 83
    Angular adaptor
  • 68
    Reliable
  • 36
    Great customer support
  • 32
    Great documentation
  • 25
    Real-time synchronization
  • 21
    Mobile friendly
  • 18
    Rapid prototyping
  • 14
    Great security
  • 12
    Automatic scaling
  • 11
    Freakingly awesome
  • 8
    Super fast development
  • 8
    Angularfire is an amazing addition!
  • 8
    Chat
  • 6
    Built in user auth/oauth
  • 6
    Ios adaptor
  • 6
    Awesome next-gen backend
  • 6
    Firebase hosting
  • 4
    Speed of light
  • 4
    Very easy to use
  • 3
    Great
  • 3
    It's made development super fast
  • 3
    Brilliant for startups
  • 2
    The concurrent updates create a great experience
  • 2
    Push notification
  • 2
    .net
  • 2
    Cloud functions
  • 2
    Free hosting
  • 2
    Free authentication solution
  • 2
    JS Offline and Sync suport
  • 2
    Low battery consumption
  • 2
    I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
  • 2
    Great all-round functionality
  • 1
    Large
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Free SSL
  • 1
    Faster workflow
  • 1
    Google's support
  • 1
    CDN & cache out of the box
  • 1
    Easy Reactjs integration
  • 1
    Simple and easy
  • 1
    Good Free Limits
  • 1
    Serverless
  • 12
    Completely Free
  • 8
    Native App + Web integrations
  • 8
    Email/Password
  • 7
    Passwordless
  • 6
    Works seemlessly with other Firebase Services
  • 5
    Integration with OAuth Providers
  • 4
    Anonymous Users
  • 4
    Easy to Integrate and Manage
  • 1
    MFA

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Firebase
Cons of Firebase Authentication
  • 31
    Can become expensive
  • 16
    No open source, you depend on external company
  • 15
    Scalability is not infinite
  • 9
    Not Flexible Enough
  • 7
    Cant filter queries
  • 3
    Very unstable server
  • 3
    No Relational Data
  • 2
    Too many errors
  • 2
    No offline sync
  • 6
    Heavy webpack

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Firebase?

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

What is Firebase Authentication?

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Firebase?
What companies use Firebase Authentication?
See which teams inside your own company are using Firebase or Firebase Authentication.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Firebase?
What tools integrate with Firebase Authentication?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

GitNode.jsFirebase+5
7
2343
What are some alternatives to Firebase and Firebase Authentication?
Parse
With Parse, you can add a scalable and powerful backend in minutes and launch a full-featured app in record time without ever worrying about server management. We offer push notifications, social integration, data storage, and the ability to add rich custom logic to your app’s backend with Cloud Code.
MongoDB
MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
Heroku
Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
Auth0
A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.
Realm
The Realm Mobile Platform is a next-generation data layer for applications. Realm is reactive, concurrent, and lightweight, allowing you to work with live, native objects.
See all alternatives