StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. File Uploads
  5. FilePond vs tus.io

FilePond vs tus.io

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

tus.io
tus.io
Stacks11
Followers31
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.7K
Forks108
FilePond
FilePond
Stacks15
Followers47
Votes0
GitHub Stars16.2K
Forks858

FilePond vs tus.io: What are the differences?

FilePond and tus.io are both tools used for file uploads on websites. While they serve a similar purpose, there are several key differences between the two.
  1. Efficiency: FilePond uses the QueueUp strategy, where it uploads files one by one in a sequential manner. On the other hand, tus.io uses parallel chunk uploads, allowing multiple chunks of a file to be uploaded simultaneously. This makes tus.io faster and more efficient for larger files.

  2. Flexibility: FilePond provides a ready-to-use UI with built-in features for file manipulation, such as cropping and rotating. It also supports various file types and integrates smoothly with popular frontend frameworks. In contrast, tus.io focuses solely on the file upload functionality and does not provide any built-in UI or file manipulation features. This allows for more flexibility, as it can be integrated into any frontend setup.

  3. Error Handling: FilePond has extensive error handling mechanisms, providing detailed error messages and options for retrying failed uploads. It also has built-in support for automatic retries and resumable uploads. On the other hand, tus.io provides a simpler error handling mechanism and does not have built-in support for automatic retries or resumable uploads.

  4. Backend Support: FilePond supports various server-side technologies, including PHP, Node.js, and ASP.NET. It also has plugins for popular CMS platforms like WordPress and Joomla. On the other hand, tus.io is language-agnostic and can be implemented with any backend technology that supports the tus protocol.

  5. Scalability: FilePond is suitable for smaller applications or websites with moderate file upload requirements. It may not be the best option for high-traffic websites or applications that deal with large numbers of concurrent file uploads. tus.io, on the other hand, is designed to handle large-scale file uploads with ease and is better suited for situations that require high scalability.

  6. Community and Support: FilePond has a larger and more active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and a dedicated support team. It also has a paid version with additional features and priority support. tus.io has a smaller community but still provides documentation and basic support through its website.

In summary, FilePond is a powerful tool with a user-friendly UI and extensive features, suitable for smaller applications. tus.io, on the other hand, is designed for scalability and performance, with a focus on efficient file uploads and compatibility with any backend technology.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

tus.io
tus.io
FilePond
FilePond

Open protocol for resumable file uploads

A JavaScript library that can upload anything you throw at it, optimizes images for faster uploads and offers a great, accessible, silky smooth user experience.

HTTP-based;Production-ready;Open source;Minimalistic design;Extensible;Community-owned;Backed by Vimeo & Transloadit
Accepts directories, files, blobs, local URLs, remote URLs and Data URIs; Drop files, select on filesystem, copy and paste files, or add files using the API; Async uploading with AJAX, or encode files as base64 data and send along form post; Accessible, tested with AT software like VoiceOver and JAWS, navigable by Keyboard; Image optimization, automatic image resizing, cropping, and fixes EXIF orientation; Responsive, automatically scales to available space, is functional on both mobile and desktop devices
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.7K
GitHub Stars
16.2K
GitHub Forks
108
GitHub Forks
858
Stacks
11
Stacks
15
Followers
31
Followers
47
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Uppy
Uppy
Transloadit
Transloadit
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Vue.js
Vue.js
Ember.js
Ember.js
JavaScript
JavaScript
Django
Django
AngularJS
AngularJS
PHP
PHP
Angular
Angular
Laravel
Laravel
React
React
jQuery
jQuery

What are some alternatives to tus.io, FilePond?

Uploadcare

Uploadcare

Uploadcare is file management platform and a CDN for user-generated content. It is a robust file API for uploading, managing, processing, rendering, optimizing, and delivering users’ content.

Transloadit

Transloadit

Transloadit handles file uploading & file processing for your websites and mobile apps. We can process video, audio, images and documents.

Bytescale

Bytescale

Bytescale is the best way to serve images, videos, and audio for web apps. Includes: Fast CDN, Storage, and Media Processing APIs.

Uppy

Uppy

Uppy is a sleek modular file uploader for web browsers. Add it to your app with one line of code, or build a custom version with just the plugins you need via Webpack/Browserify. 100% open source, backed by a company (Transloadit).

Filestack

Filestack

Filepicker helps developers connect to their users' content. Connect, Store, and Process any file from anywhere on the Internet.

CarrierWave

CarrierWave

This gem provides a simple and extremely flexible way to upload files from Ruby applications. It works well with Rack based web applications, such as Ruby on Rails.

Paperclip

Paperclip

It is intended as an easy file attachment library for ActiveRecord. The intent behind it was to keep setup as easy as possible and to treat files as much like other attributes as possible.

Shrine

Shrine

Shrine implements a plugin system analogous to Roda’s and Sequel’s. Shrine ships with over 25 plugins, which together provide a great arsenal of features. Where CarrierWave and other file upload libraries favor complex class-level DSLs, Shrine favours simple instance-level interface.

Flatfile

Flatfile

The drop-in data importer that implements in hours, not weeks. Give your users the import experience you always dreamed of, but never had time to build.

CameraTag

CameraTag

With one line of code you can easily start collecting videos for applications ranging from video-comments to talent competitions, political action, virtual interviews, talent scouting and more.<br>

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase