StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Low Code Platforms
  5. FileMaker vs Google App Maker

FileMaker vs Google App Maker

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google App Maker
Google App Maker
Stacks177
Followers237
Votes0
FileMaker
FileMaker
Stacks36
Followers42
Votes8

FileMaker vs Google App Maker: What are the differences?

Introduction

FileMaker and Google App Maker are both software platforms that allow users to create custom applications without the need for extensive programming knowledge. However, there are several key differences between the two platforms that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Integration with other tools: While both FileMaker and Google App Maker allow for integration with external tools and services, FileMaker offers a wider range of options for integrating with other databases, web services, and APIs. This makes FileMaker a more suitable choice for businesses that rely on complex integrations with other systems.

  2. Deployment options: Google App Maker is a cloud-based platform that allows for easy deployment of applications on Google Cloud Platform. On the other hand, FileMaker allows for both cloud-based deployment on FileMaker Cloud as well as on-premise deployment using the FileMaker Server. This gives users more flexibility in choosing the deployment option that best suits their needs.

  3. User interface customization: While both platforms allow for customization of user interfaces, FileMaker provides more granular control over the design and layout of applications. With FileMaker, users can create highly customized and visually appealing interfaces, whereas Google App Maker offers more limited customization options.

  4. Security features: FileMaker has a robust set of security features that allow for fine-grained control over access to data and functionality within an application. It offers features such as user authentication, data encryption, and the ability to set different levels of access privileges for different users. Google App Maker also offers security features, but they are more limited compared to FileMaker.

  5. Development complexity: Google App Maker is designed to be a simpler and more user-friendly platform compared to FileMaker. It has a visual development environment that allows users to create applications through drag-and-drop and point-and-click interactions. FileMaker, on the other hand, offers more advanced development capabilities, including the ability to write custom scripts and use SQL queries. This makes FileMaker a more suitable choice for users with more complex application requirements.

  6. Pricing model: Google App Maker is included as part of the G Suite (now Google Workspace) subscription, which means that users already using G Suite have access to the platform at no additional cost. However, FileMaker has a separate pricing model, with different licensing options depending on the number of users and the deployment method. It is worth noting that FileMaker licenses can be more expensive compared to the cost of a G Suite subscription.

In summary, FileMaker and Google App Maker have different strengths and offer unique features that cater to different application development needs. FileMaker provides more advanced customization, integration, and development capabilities, while Google App Maker offers simplicity and ease of use, especially for users already using G Suite. The choice between the two platforms ultimately depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user or organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google App Maker
Google App Maker
FileMaker
FileMaker

App Maker lets you develop powerful apps with relative ease. Create a model to manage your data, build a UI in the visual editor, use Apps Script to write some scripts, and you're on your way.

It is a Platform to create innovative custom apps for your workplace.

-
Quick Reports; Cross-platform; Quick Find; Theme Styles; Cross-Platform Access; Powerful Encryption; Field Formatting.
Statistics
Stacks
177
Stacks
36
Followers
237
Followers
42
Votes
0
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Rapid development
  • 2
    REST API
  • 1
    API
  • 1
    Permissions
  • 1
    All included
Cons
  • 1
    Expensive
Integrations
G Suite
G Suite
Google Cloud SQL
Google Cloud SQL
Android Studio
Android Studio
iOS
iOS
Android OS
Android OS

What are some alternatives to Google App Maker, FileMaker?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Stamplay

Stamplay

The API-based development platform enabling developers to do 80% of the job in 1% of the time thanks to: out of the box APIs for users and data, one-click integration with any API, scalable infrastructure and SDKs. Build Rome in a day.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Qt

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase