Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Lucia vs Famo.us: What are the differences?
Developers describe Lucia as "3kB Vue Alternative". It is a tiny JavaScript (UMD compatible) library that serves as a bridge between vanilla JavaScript and Vue. It provides a declarative API similar to Vue/Alpine to create views, making development predictable and intuitive through markup-centric code. On the other hand, Famo.us is detailed as "A JavaScript framework for everyone who wants to build beautiful experiences on any device". Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.
Lucia and Famo.us belong to "Javascript UI Libraries" category of the tech stack.
Famo.us is an open source tool with 6.4K GitHub stars and 744 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Famo.us's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Famo.us
- Speedy as native apps14
- Future11
- WebGL9
- Javascript9
- Components6
- 3D physics engine6
- Open source6
- Performance5
- Rendering Engine for the Web5
- Runs on Android4
- Works with Angular3
- Works with Meteor3
- Runs on iOS3
- Great for mobile apps3
- Works with Backbone2
- Works with React2
- Replaces the need for native app development2
- FRP1