StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Background Processing
  5. Faktory vs PHP-FPM

Faktory vs PHP-FPM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PHP-FPM
PHP-FPM
Stacks121
Followers119
Votes0
Faktory
Faktory
Stacks7
Followers27
Votes3
GitHub Stars6.0K
Forks236

Faktory vs PHP-FPM: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Faktory and PHP-FPM

  1. Language Support: Faktory is written in Go, while PHP-FPM is specifically designed to work with PHP scripts. This fundamental difference in programming languages can impact the performance, compatibility, and available features in each system.

  2. Functionality: Faktory is a background job server, focused on handling task queuing and processing, while PHP-FPM is a Process Manager specifically for PHP scripts, managing and serving web requests. As a result, Faktory is more versatile in handling a wide range of tasks beyond PHP script execution.

  3. Scalability: Faktory provides built-in scalability features that enable running multiple instances and distributed systems seamlessly. On the other hand, PHP-FPM scalability heavily relies on server configuration and may require additional tools to manage load balancing and multiple instances effectively.

  4. Dependency Handling: Faktory manages dependencies and libraries with Go modules, ensuring version control and compatibility. PHP-FPM utilizes PHP Composer for handling dependencies, which may have different implications in terms of ease of use, version control, and stability of the system.

  5. Resource Efficiency: Faktory is known for its efficient resource usage and performance due to being written in Go, a language designed for minimal resource consumption and high performance. In contrast, PHP-FPM's resource efficiency heavily depends on server settings, PHP configuration, and script optimization practices.

  6. Monitoring and Management: Faktory provides extensive monitoring and management capabilities through a web dashboard and APIs, facilitating tracking job performance, queue status, and system health. PHP-FPM, though offering basic process monitoring tools, may require additional plugins or third-party software for in-depth monitoring and management functionalities.

In Summary, Faktory and PHP-FPM differ significantly in language support, functionality, scalability, dependency handling, resource efficiency, and monitoring capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PHP-FPM
PHP-FPM
Faktory
Faktory

It is an alternative PHP FastCGI implementation with some additional features useful for sites of any size, especially busier sites. It includes Adaptive process spawning, Advanced process management with graceful stop/start, Emergency restart in case of accidental opcode cache destruction etc.

Redis -> Sidekiq == Faktory -> Faktory. Faktory is a server daemon which provides a simple API to produce and consume background jobs. Jobs are a small JSON hash with a few mandatory keys.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
6.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
236
Stacks
121
Stacks
7
Followers
119
Followers
27
Votes
0
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Worker language agnostic
  • 1
    Simple service API
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js
Ruby
Ruby
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
Elixir
Elixir
PHP
PHP
Java
Java
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to PHP-FPM, Faktory?

Sidekiq

Sidekiq

Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.

Beanstalkd

Beanstalkd

Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.

Hangfire

Hangfire

It is an open-source framework that helps you to create, process and manage your background jobs, i.e. operations you don't want to put in your request processing pipeline. It supports all kind of background tasks – short-running and long-running, CPU intensive and I/O intensive, one shot and recurrent.

Resque

Resque

Background jobs can be any Ruby class or module that responds to perform. Your existing classes can easily be converted to background jobs or you can create new classes specifically to do work. Or, you can do both.

delayed_job

delayed_job

Delayed_job (or DJ) encapsulates the common pattern of asynchronously executing longer tasks in the background. It is a direct extraction from Shopify where the job table is responsible for a multitude of core tasks.

Kue

Kue

Kue is a feature rich priority job queue for node.js backed by redis. A key feature of Kue is its clean user-interface for viewing and managing queued, active, failed, and completed jobs.

Bull

Bull

The fastest, most reliable, Redis-based queue for Node. Carefully written for rock solid stability and atomicity.

Cron

Cron

Background-only application which launches and runs other applications, or opens documents, at specified dates and times.

Que

Que

Que is a high-performance alternative to DelayedJob or QueueClassic that improves the reliability of your application by protecting your jobs with the same ACID guarantees as the rest of your data.

Goose

Goose

It is a simple, reliable & scalable background processing library for Clojure. It has a transparent design & cloud-native architecture.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase