Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Istio vs fabric8: What are the differences?
Control Plane: Istio primarily focuses on managing microservices traffic by providing a control plane that helps in implementing various traffic management techniques like load balancing, routing, and traffic shifting. On the other hand, fabric8 focuses on enhancing the development process by providing tools for building, testing, and deploying applications.
Supported Platforms: Istio is more tightly integrated with Kubernetes and is widely used in Kubernetes environments for managing microservices communication. Fabric8, on the other hand, provides support for a wider range of platforms beyond just Kubernetes, including OpenShift, Docker, and other container platforms.
Monitoring and Observability: Istio comes with built-in support for monitoring and observability features like distributed tracing, monitoring dashboards, and telemetry data collection. Fabric8 also offers monitoring capabilities, but it is more focused on developer experience and providing insights into the development lifecycle.
Service Mesh Implementation: Istio is known for its robust service mesh implementation that provides advanced features like mutual TLS authentication, fault injection, and circuit breaking for microservices. Fabric8, while offering some service mesh functionalities, is more oriented towards simplifying the development and deployment processes for applications.
Community Support: Istio has a strong community backing, with contributions and support from major tech companies like Google, IBM, and Lyft. Fabric8, as an open-source project under the Fabric8.io community, also has an active community support, but it is relatively smaller compared to Istio.
Customization and Extensibility: Istio provides a high level of customization and extensibility through its rich set of APIs, allowing users to tailor their microservices communication policies and configurations. Fabric8, while offering some level of customization, is more opinionated in its approach and provides predefined patterns and workflows for application development.
In Summary, Istio focuses on managing microservices traffic with a strong emphasis on Kubernetes environments, while fabric8 is more oriented towards enhancing the development experience across various platforms beyond just Kubernetes.
Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.
Pros of fabric8
- Easy to build and automate integration testing1
Pros of Istio
- Zero code for logging and monitoring14
- Service Mesh9
- Great flexibility8
- Resiliency5
- Powerful authorization mechanisms5
- Ingress controller5
- Easy integration with Kubernetes and Docker4
- Full Security4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of fabric8
Cons of Istio
- Performance17