StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. ExpressJS vs Jersey

ExpressJS vs Jersey

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Stacks35.1K
Followers24.0K
Votes1.6K
Jersey
Jersey
Stacks217
Followers125
Votes6

ExpressJS vs Jersey: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will compare the key differences between ExpressJS and Jersey, two popular web frameworks used for building web applications.

  1. Programming Language: ExpressJS is a web framework for Node.js written in JavaScript, while Jersey is a framework for building RESTful Web Services in Java, thus differing in the programming languages they are built upon.

  2. Platform Compatibility: ExpressJS is designed for server-side applications and is compatible with various operating systems, whereas Jersey is specifically tailored for building RESTful APIs in Java-based applications, limiting its platform compatibility.

  3. Community Support: ExpressJS has a larger and more active community of developers contributing to its continuous development and providing extensive support through various forums and resources. On the other hand, Jersey, being focused on Java, has a dedicated community backing but may not be as widespread as ExpressJS.

  4. Middleware Implementation: ExpressJS offers a more flexible and simple approach to middleware implementation, allowing developers to easily plug in various functionalities in the request-response cycle. In contrast, Jersey has a more structured and standardized middleware implementation specific to Java web services, with less room for customization.

  5. Routing System: ExpressJS provides a more straightforward and intuitive routing system, allowing developers to define routes and handle HTTP requests efficiently. Jersey, being a Java-based framework, has a routing system that aligns with Java conventions, making it more verbose and less concise compared to ExpressJS.

  6. Template Engine Support: ExpressJS has built-in support for multiple template engines like Pug, EJS, and Handlebars, making it easier to render dynamic views. Jersey, primarily focused on building APIs, lacks direct support for template engines and is more suitable for data-oriented web services rather than generating HTML views.

In Summary, ExpressJS and Jersey differ in programming language, platform compatibility, community support, middleware implementation, routing system, and template engine support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Jersey
Jersey

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Robust routing;HTTP helpers (redirection, caching, etc);View system supporting 14+ template engines;Content negotiation;Focus on high performance;Executable for generating applications quickly;High test coverage
Track the JAX-RS API and provide regular releases of production quality Reference Implementations that ships with GlassFish; Provide APIs to extend Jersey & Build a community of users and developers; Make it easy to build RESTful Web services utilizing Java and the Java Virtual Machine.
Statistics
Stacks
35.1K
Stacks
217
Followers
24.0K
Followers
125
Votes
1.6K
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 381
    Simple
  • 336
    Node.js
  • 244
    Javascript
  • 193
    High performance
  • 152
    Robust routing
Cons
  • 27
    Not python
  • 17
    Overrated
  • 14
    No multithreading
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 5
    Not fast
Pros
  • 4
    Lightweight
  • 1
    Fast Performance With Microservices
  • 1
    Java standard
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
Oracle
Oracle
Java
Java
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Java EE
Java EE
Eclipse
Eclipse

What are some alternatives to ExpressJS, Jersey?

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase