StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Express Gateway vs LoopBack

Express Gateway vs LoopBack

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

LoopBack
LoopBack
Stacks285
Followers556
Votes33
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks1.2K
Express Gateway
Express Gateway
Stacks62
Followers167
Votes10

Express Gateway vs LoopBack: What are the differences?

Introduction

Express Gateway and LoopBack are both popular frameworks used to develop web applications. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two that set them apart. In this Markdown code, we will highlight six specific differences between Express Gateway and LoopBack.

  1. Architecture: Express Gateway is a gateway solution that focuses on API management and enables building microservices architectures. It provides a centralized platform to manage and control access to APIs. On the other hand, LoopBack is a framework for building RESTful APIs and applications. It follows the model-view-controller (MVC) architecture and provides tools and libraries for developing server-side business logic.

  2. Authentication and Authorization: Express Gateway offers robust authentication and authorization capabilities through its plugin-based system. It supports various authentication methods, including JWT, OAuth, and LDAP. It also provides role-based access control (RBAC) to manage user permissions. In contrast, LoopBack provides built-in authentication and authorization features out of the box. It supports role-based access control (RBAC) and allows the customization of authentication providers.

  3. Database Integration: Express Gateway can integrate with various databases, including SQL, NoSQL, and key-value stores, using plugins. It provides a flexible data store abstraction layer that allows developers to choose their preferred database technology. LoopBack, on the other hand, comes with built-in support for popular databases like MySQL, MongoDB, Oracle, and PostgreSQL. It provides an object-relational mapping (ORM) layer that simplifies database interactions.

  4. Extensibility: Express Gateway offers a plugin-based architecture that allows developers to extend its functionality easily. It provides a wide range of plugins for different use cases, such as rate limiting, caching, logging, and more. Developers can also create their custom plugins to meet specific requirements. LoopBack, on the other hand, provides strong extensibility through its middleware and boot scripts. It enables developers to add custom logic before and after request processing and supports middleware composition.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Express Gateway has a growing community and an active ecosystem of plugins and integrations. It benefits from the popularity of Node.js and its rich package ecosystem. LoopBack, on the other hand, is part of the Node.js Foundation and has a mature and thriving community. It has a large number of contributors and a wide range of community-maintained modules and integrations.

  6. Supported Environments: Express Gateway is designed to be deployed as a standalone server or as a Kubernetes ingress controller. It provides support for containerization and can be easily scaled up or down. LoopBack, on the other hand, can be deployed in various environments, including on-premises servers, cloud platforms, and serverless environments. It offers flexibility in choosing the deployment environment based on specific requirements.

In summary, Express Gateway is focused on API management and microservices architecture while LoopBack is a framework for building RESTful APIs and applications. Express Gateway provides a plugin-based gateway solution, supports various authentication methods and database integrations, and has a growing community and active ecosystem. LoopBack, on the other hand, offers built-in authentication and authorization features, supports popular databases, and provides extensibility through middleware and boot scripts. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

LoopBack
LoopBack
Express Gateway
Express Gateway

A highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding. Connect to multiple data sources, write business logic in Node.js, glue on top of your existing services and data, connect using JS, iOS & Android SDKs.

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

A brand new core; OpenAPI spec driven REST API; GraphQL support
Authentication;Authorization;API Management;Microservices;JSON Web Token (JWT);OAuth2;Custom Plugins;Consumer Mgmt;YAML Driven; REST API;Pipelines;Built-in Policies;Hot Reload and Restart;Actions & Conditions;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
285
Stacks
62
Followers
556
Followers
167
Votes
33
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Need a nodejs ReST-API, DB, AAA, Swagger? Then loopback
  • 9
    Easy Database Migration
  • 6
    Code generator
  • 4
    The future of API's
  • 2
    GraphQL
Cons
  • 7
    Community is slow
  • 1
    Backward compatibility
Pros
  • 4
    Microservices, Body manipulation
  • 3
    Amazing api gwy. Easy and powerful configuration
  • 3
    Custom Plugins
Cons
  • 2
    Deprecated
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
TypeScript
TypeScript
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
StrongLoop
StrongLoop
GraphQL
GraphQL
Prometheus
Prometheus
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Docker
Docker
Auth0
Auth0
StatsD
StatsD
Node.js
Node.js
Azure Kubernetes Service
Azure Kubernetes Service
ExpressJS
ExpressJS

What are some alternatives to LoopBack, Express Gateway?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot