StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Eureka vs Jenkins

Eureka vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Eureka
Eureka
Stacks291
Followers779
Votes70
GitHub Stars12.7K
Forks3.8K

Eureka vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Eureka and Jenkins, highlighting the key differences between the two.

  1. Eureka Architecture: Eureka is a service registry and discovery server that enables microservices to locate and communicate with each other. It follows a decentralized architecture, where each microservice acts as a client and registers itself with the Eureka server. The Eureka server is responsible for managing the registry and providing service discovery capabilities.

  2. Jenkins Continuous Integration: Jenkins, on the other hand, is an open-source automation server that enables the continuous integration and delivery of software projects. It is primarily focused on building, testing, and deploying applications, enabling developers to automate various stages of the software development lifecycle.

  3. Purpose and Scope: Eureka is specifically designed for service discovery and registration, providing a centralized repository of microservices. It allows services to dynamically discover and communicate with each other, facilitating the creation of resilient and scalable architectures. Jenkins, on the other hand, is a versatile automation server that can be used for a wide range of tasks, including building, testing, and deploying applications, as well as managing pipelines and workflows.

  4. Configuration and Extensibility: Eureka provides a lightweight, out-of-the-box solution for service registry and discovery, making it easy to set up and configure. It also supports integration with other tools and frameworks, such as Spring Cloud, to enhance its capabilities. Jenkins, on the other hand, offers a highly customizable and extensible platform, allowing users to install plugins and build custom workflows tailored to their specific needs.

  5. Integration with Build Tools: Eureka is not directly involved in the build process of applications, as it mainly focuses on service registry and discovery. On the other hand, Jenkins integrates seamlessly with popular build tools like Maven and Gradle, providing built-in support for building and testing applications during the CI/CD process.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Eureka is part of the Spring Cloud ecosystem, which is widely adopted and supported by the Java community. It benefits from the extensive knowledge base, documentation, and community support that Spring projects offer. Jenkins, being one of the oldest and most widely used automation servers, has a large and active community, with a vast collection of plugins and integrations available.

In summary, Eureka is a service registry and discovery server, while Jenkins is an automation server focused on continuous integration and delivery. Eureka excels in managing microservices and facilitating their dynamic communication, whereas Jenkins provides a versatile platform for automating various stages of the software development lifecycle.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Eureka

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Eureka
Eureka

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Eureka is a REST (Representational State Transfer) based service that is primarily used in the AWS cloud for locating services for the purpose of load balancing and failover of middle-tier servers.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
12.7K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
3.8K
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
291
Followers
50.4K
Followers
779
Votes
2.2K
Votes
70
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Pros
  • 21
    Easy setup and integration with spring-cloud
  • 9
    Web ui
  • 8
    Health checking
  • 8
    Monitoring
  • 7
    Circuit breaker
Cons
  • 1
    Nada
Integrations
No integrations available
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Eureka?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Consul

Consul

Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana