StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Open Source Cloud
  5. Eucalyptus vs Terraform

Eucalyptus vs Terraform

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
Stacks18
Followers86
Votes0
Terraform
Terraform
Stacks22.9K
Followers14.7K
Votes344
GitHub Stars47.0K
Forks10.1K

Eucalyptus vs Terraform: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Eucalyptus and Terraform

Eucalyptus and Terraform are both popular tools used in cloud computing, but they have some key differences. Here are the six main differences:

  1. Architecture: Eucalyptus is a private cloud platform that provides infrastructure services compatible with Amazon Web Services (AWS). It aims to create a seamless hybrid cloud environment by seamlessly integrating with AWS services. On the other hand, Terraform is an infrastructure as code tool that allows for the provisioning and management of cloud resources across various providers, including AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and more.

  2. Declarative vs. Imperative: Eucalyptus follows an imperative model, where users need to define specific steps to achieve their desired infrastructure state. Meanwhile, Terraform operates on a declarative model, allowing users to describe the desired infrastructure state without specifying the exact steps to get there. Terraform then analyzes the changes and executes the necessary actions to achieve the desired state.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: Terraform has a larger and more active community compared to Eucalyptus. It has a vast ecosystem of plugins and modules contributed by the community, which allows for easier integration with an extensive range of cloud services and providers. Eucalyptus, while being widely used in certain industries, has a smaller community and a more limited ecosystem.

  4. Vendor Lock-in: Eucalyptus is designed to provide compatibility with AWS, allowing users to adopt a hybrid cloud approach and leverage AWS services seamlessly. However, this compatibility also means that users may face some degree of vendor lock-in if they heavily rely on AWS-specific features. In contrast, Terraform aims to provide an agnostic cross-cloud and cross-provider infrastructure as code solution, reducing the risk of vendor lock-in.

  5. Granularity of Control: Eucalyptus offers fine-grained control over the infrastructure resources, allowing users to manage and configure the underlying servers, storage, and network components. Terraform, on the other hand, focuses on the provisioning and management of higher-level cloud resources such as virtual machines, databases, load balancers, and network infrastructure. It provides less control over the underlying hardware components.

  6. Maturity and Adoption: Eucalyptus has been around for quite some time and has gained considerable adoption in specific industries and organizations. It has a more mature codebase and a well-established user base. In contrast, Terraform is relatively newer but rapidly gaining popularity due to its ease of use, versatility, and support for multiple cloud providers.

In summary, Eucalyptus is a private cloud platform focused on hybrid cloud integration with AWS, while Terraform is an infrastructure as code tool for provisioning and managing cloud resources across various providers. Eucalyptus follows an imperative model, has a smaller community, and offers fine-grained control. Meanwhile, Terraform follows a declarative model, has a larger community, supports multiple providers, and aims to reduce vendor lock-in.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Eucalyptus, Terraform

Sung Won
Sung Won

Nov 4, 2019

DecidedonGoogle Cloud IoT CoreGoogle Cloud IoT CoreTerraformTerraformPythonPython

Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

Check out the GitHub repo attached

2.25M views2.25M
Comments
Timothy
Timothy

SRE

Mar 20, 2020

Decided

I personally am not a huge fan of vendor lock in for multiple reasons:

  • I've seen cost saving moves to the cloud end up costing a fortune and trapping companies due to over utilization of cloud specific features.
  • I've seen S3 failures nearly take down half the internet.
  • I've seen companies get stuck in the cloud because they aren't built cloud agnostic.

I choose to use terraform for my cloud provisioning for these reasons:

  • It's cloud agnostic so I can use it no matter where I am.
  • It isn't difficult to use and uses a relatively easy to read language.
  • It tests infrastructure before running it, and enables me to see and keep changes up to date.
  • It runs from the same CLI I do most of my CM work from.
385k views385k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

May 4, 2020

Decided

Because Pulumi uses real programming languages, you can actually write abstractions for your infrastructure code, which is incredibly empowering. You still 'describe' your desired state, but by having a programming language at your fingers, you can factor out patterns, and package it up for easier consumption.

426k views426k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
Terraform
Terraform

Eucalyptus is open source software for building private, AWS-compatible IT, QA, and developer clouds. It makes it easy to deliver cloud computing, just like AWS, from within your data center.

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Hybrid Cloud Management - Launch instances, create snapshots and manage autoscaling groups in either your private or public clouds from a single environment. Now the same powerful and easy to use self-service interface that provisions and manages Eucalyptus Cloud resources can manage your AWS cloud resources.;AWS Compatibility - Eucalyptus provides industry-leading compatibility with popular Amazon Web Services (AWS) APIs including EC2, S3, Elastic Block Store (EBS), Identity and Access Management (IAM), Auto Scaling, Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), and CloudWatch.;Compute - Eucalyptus allows you to use industry-standard servers, storage, networking, and virtualization technologies to deliver cost-effective, AWS-compatible cloud services in your datacenter. Eucalyptus is compatible with AWS’s EC2 and allows you to easily deploy compute resources and efficiently increase or decrease compute capacity based on application demands.;Networking - Eucalyptus offers flexible and scalable virtual networking capabilities compatible with AWS Elastic IPs, Security Groups, and Elastic Load Balancing.;Storage - Eucalyptus provides S3-compatible object storage and EBS-compatible block storage using industry-standard storage hardware to deliver against a variety of application performance, cost, and reliability requirements.;Self-service Provisioning - In addition to providing REST-based APIs for programmatic access, Eucalyptus includes an easy to use web-based console to provide self-service provisioning of cloud resources to users.;Cloud Management - Eucalyptus allows administrators to easily manage their cloud via REST-based APIs, command line interface (CLI), or from a web-based console.
Infrastructure as Code: Infrastructure is described using a high-level configuration syntax. This allows a blueprint of your datacenter to be versioned and treated as you would any other code. Additionally, infrastructure can be shared and re-used.;Execution Plans: Terraform has a "planning" step where it generates an execution plan. The execution plan shows what Terraform will do when you call apply. This lets you avoid any surprises when Terraform manipulates infrastructure.;Resource Graph: Terraform builds a graph of all your resources, and parallelizes the creation and modification of any non-dependent resources. Because of this, Terraform builds infrastructure as efficiently as possible, and operators get insight into dependencies in their infrastructure.;Change Automation: Complex changesets can be applied to your infrastructure with minimal human interaction. With the previously mentioned execution plan and resource graph, you know exactly what Terraform will change and in what order, avoiding many possible human errors
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
47.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
10.1K
Stacks
18
Stacks
22.9K
Followers
86
Followers
14.7K
Votes
0
Votes
344
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 121
    Infrastructure as code
  • 73
    Declarative syntax
  • 45
    Planning
  • 28
    Simple
  • 24
    Parallelism
Cons
  • 1
    Doesn't have full support to GKE
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Amazon Route 53
Amazon Route 53
AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon VPC
Amazon VPC
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Amazon ElastiCache
Amazon ElastiCache
Amazon EBS
Amazon EBS
AWS CloudTrail
AWS CloudTrail
Amazon SNS
Amazon SNS
Heroku
Heroku
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
DNSimple
DNSimple
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Consul
Consul
Equinix Metal
Equinix Metal
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
OpenStack
OpenStack
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine

What are some alternatives to Eucalyptus, Terraform?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

OpenStack

OpenStack

OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.

Apache CloudStack

Apache CloudStack

CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Fabric

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

cPanel

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana