StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Orm
  5. Entity Framework vs TypeORM

Entity Framework vs TypeORM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Entity Framework
Entity Framework
Stacks2.1K
Followers240
Votes19
TypeORM
TypeORM
Stacks757
Followers813
Votes81
GitHub Stars36.0K
Forks6.5K

Entity Framework vs TypeORM: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing Entity Framework and TypeORM, there are several key differences that developers should be aware of. These differences can affect how a developer chooses between the two frameworks for their projects.

1. Data Source Support: Entity Framework is tightly integrated with Microsoft SQL Server, while TypeORM supports a variety of databases including MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and more. This difference in data source support may influence the choice of framework based on the database technology being used in a project.

2. Language Support: Entity Framework is primarily used with C# and .NET applications, whereas TypeORM is commonly used with TypeScript applications. This difference in language support can impact the compatibility and integration of the framework within the overall codebase of a project.

3. Query Language: Entity Framework uses LINQ (Language Integrated Query) for querying databases, while TypeORM uses raw SQL queries or an Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) approach. The choice between LINQ and raw SQL queries may depend on a developer's familiarity and preference for a particular query language.

4. Community Support: Entity Framework has a larger and more established community compared to TypeORM, leading to a wealth of resources, tutorials, and community-driven extensions. TypeORM, on the other hand, may have a smaller but growing community that offers more tailored support for specific use cases.

5. Performance Optimization: Entity Framework provides built-in features for performance optimization, such as query caching and lazy loading, while TypeORM may require more manual configuration for optimizing performance. This difference in performance optimization capabilities can impact the efficiency and scalability of an application.

6. Maturity and Stability: Entity Framework has been in development for over a decade and is a mature framework with a stable release history, whereas TypeORM is a relatively newer framework that continues to evolve with frequent updates. This distinction in maturity and stability may influence the level of risk and confidence in using each framework for production applications.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Entity Framework and TypeORM, such as data source support, language compatibility, query language, community support, performance optimization, and maturity, can help developers make informed decisions when choosing a framework for their projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Entity Framework
Entity Framework
TypeORM
TypeORM

It is an object-relational mapper that enables .NET developers to work with relational data using domain-specific objects. It eliminates the need for most of the data-access code that developers usually need to write.

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

ORM, Work with relational data using domain-specific objects;Eliminates the need for most of the data-access code
automatically create the database table schemes based on your models; transparently insert / update / delete to the database your objects; map your selections from tables to JavaScript objects and map table columns to object properties; easily create one-to-one, many-to-one, one-to-many and many-to-many relations between tables; and much more.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
36.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.5K
Stacks
2.1K
Stacks
757
Followers
240
Followers
813
Votes
19
Votes
81
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    LINQ
  • 3
    Object Oriented
  • 3
    Strongly Object-Oriented
  • 2
    Code first approach
  • 2
    Multiple approach (Model/Database/Code) first
Pros
  • 30
    Typescript
  • 12
    Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Ser
  • 9
    Cons of TypeORM
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 7
    Works in NodeJS, Browser, Ionic, Cordova and Electron p
Cons
  • 5
    Completely abandoned by its creator
  • 3
    Too complex for what it does
  • 2
    Doesn't really support native javascript
  • 1
    Cannot use query on any relation
  • 1
    Not proper/real type safety
Integrations
Firebird
Firebird
.NET
.NET
Oracle
Oracle
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
SQLite
SQLite
MySQL
MySQL
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
IBM DB2
IBM DB2
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Entity Framework, TypeORM?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Sequelize

Sequelize

Sequelize is a promise-based ORM for Node.js and io.js. It supports the dialects PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQLite and MSSQL and features solid transaction support, relations, read replication and more.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase