StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Mvc Frameworks
  5. Ember.js vs ExpressJS

Ember.js vs ExpressJS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ember.js
Ember.js
Stacks1.6K
Followers865
Votes775
GitHub Stars22.6K
Forks4.2K
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Stacks35.1K
Followers24.0K
Votes1.6K

Ember.js vs ExpressJS: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: Ember.js follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, providing a structured way to build web applications. In contrast, ExpressJS, being a backend framework for Node.js, facilitates building web servers and APIs, following a more flexible, minimalist approach.
  2. Templating: Ember.js uses Handlebars.js as its templating engine, allowing developers to write templates in HTML with embedded expressions. On the other hand, ExpressJS does not come with a built-in templating engine but leaves the choice of templating engine to the developer, offering flexibility in choosing tools like Pug or EJS.
  3. Client-side vs. Server-side: Ember.js is a client-side JavaScript framework, running in the browser and interacting with the server through APIs. ExpressJS, on the other hand, is a server-side framework, used for building the backend logic of web applications and managing server-side operations.
  4. Feature Set: Ember.js provides a more comprehensive set of features out-of-the-box, including routing, data binding, and testing utilities, reducing the need for additional libraries or plugins. ExpressJS, being more minimalist, offers core functionalities for building web servers, requiring developers to integrate additional packages for specific features.
  5. Community and Ecosystem: Ember.js has a strong community and ecosystem, with a well-defined structure for plugins, addons, and conventions, enabling developers to leverage existing solutions and best practices. ExpressJS, while popular in the Node.js ecosystem, may require more effort in finding suitable libraries and maintaining compatibility with different modules.
  6. Learning Curve: Ember.js, with its strong conventions and opinionated structure, can have a steeper learning curve for beginners, requiring adherence to its conventions. ExpressJS, with its minimalist approach and flexibility, may have a gentler learning curve, especially for developers familiar with Node.js and JavaScript.

In Summary, Ember.js excels in providing a structured, feature-rich client-side framework with a strong community, while ExpressJS offers flexibility and minimalist approach for backend development with Node.js.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Ember.js, ExpressJS

neha
neha

CEO at NMTechEdge

Sep 25, 2020

Review

Have you ever stuck with the question that which one is the best front-end framework for you?

With continuous web development progress, the trends of the latest front-end technologies are also continuously changing with more and more sophisticated web features. These top front-end frameworks and libraries have made your complex web tasks more flexible and efficient.

Check out top front end frameworks and their features at https://www.nmtechedge.com/2020/09/24/top-4-trending-front-end-frameworks-2020/

200k views200k
Comments
Tony
Tony

Oct 21, 2020

Review

I personally like using a wholly JS stack, with TypeORM + MySql/Postgres over MongoDb + Mongoose because TypeOrm's Typescript support is much stronger. After developing large projects with Typescript, there is no going back to regular javascript (typings help catch a LOT of errors / maintains data structure !)

Sticking with a javascript stack will allow you to share certain aspects of your application between front and backend. For example: one particularly common feature is to validate API call data and form entry data. Both of these are the same data shape typically (aside from pagination, metadata, etc), and can benefit from a single schema for validation. I use Yup to define this schema, then in the front and back end I can utilize this definition instead of rewriting the same logic in two different languages.

Same goes for certain utility functions such as data structure typings, decryption, encryption, sanitizing inputs, formatting of data, and other utilities. No point of writing these in two languages when both frontend and backend will use them. It will also help reduce developer work load, due to less tests / code to work with.

The only thing you must ensure in your import chain the frontend never imports any secret variables or sensitive logic used by the backend, as that will get bundled into your application. All shared imports should be individual modules

If you want to go one step further, next.js is basically create react app with server side rendering (SSR). This would allow you to skip the annoying step of configuring separate backend and frontend build tools. Might be worth exploring depending on your skill level.

806 views806
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ember.js
Ember.js
ExpressJS
ExpressJS

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Creating web apps;Building UI
Robust routing;HTTP helpers (redirection, caching, etc);View system supporting 14+ template engines;Content negotiation;Focus on high performance;Executable for generating applications quickly;High test coverage
Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
35.1K
Followers
865
Followers
24.0K
Votes
775
Votes
1.6K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 126
    Elegant
  • 97
    Quick to develop
  • 83
    Great mvc
  • 82
    Great community
  • 73
    Great router
Cons
  • 2
    Very little flexibility
  • 2
    Too much convention, too little configuration
  • 1
    Hard to use if your API isn't RESTful
  • 1
    Hard to integrate with Non Ruby apps
Pros
  • 381
    Simple
  • 336
    Node.js
  • 244
    Javascript
  • 193
    High performance
  • 152
    Robust routing
Cons
  • 27
    Not python
  • 17
    Overrated
  • 14
    No multithreading
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 5
    Not fast
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Ember.js, ExpressJS?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase