Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Elasticsearch vs Splunk: What are the differences?
Introduction
Elasticsearch and Splunk are both popular platforms used for managing and analyzing large volumes of data. However, there are key differences between the two.
Querying and Search Capability: Elasticsearch is a search engine that is optimized for searching, querying, and analyzing structured and unstructured data. It uses inverted indices for fast retrieval of information and supports full-text search. On the other hand, Splunk is a log management and analysis tool that excels at parsing and indexing machine-generated data, making it easier to search and analyze log files and event data.
Data Collection and Indexing: Elasticsearch can index and search data in real-time as it is ingested, making it suitable for use cases that require real-time data analysis. It supports a wide range of data sources and provides flexible indexing capabilities. Splunk, on the other hand, requires data to be indexed before it can be searched and analyzed. It uses an indexing pipeline to parse, extract, and transform data into searchable events.
Scalability and Distributed Architecture: Elasticsearch is designed to be distributed and horizontally scalable, allowing it to handle large volumes of data and high query loads. It can be easily scaled by adding more nodes to the cluster. Splunk, on the other hand, does not have a distributed architecture by default and relies on a single-instance deployment. It does offer distributed search capabilities but requires additional configuration and setup.
Data Visualization and User Interface: Splunk provides a rich set of visualization tools and a user-friendly interface for analyzing and visualizing data. It offers pre-built dashboards, charts, and reports that make it easy to explore and understand data. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, focuses more on providing the underlying search and analytics capabilities. It offers APIs and integrations with other visualization tools like Kibana for data visualization.
Pricing and Licensing: Elasticsearch is open-source and free to use, but it also offers commercial licenses and subscription plans for additional features and support. Splunk, on the other hand, is a commercial product and requires a paid license for enterprise use. Its pricing is typically based on the volume of data ingested and indexed.
Community and Ecosystem: Elasticsearch has a vibrant and active open-source community. It has a wide range of community-contributed plugins and integrations, making it easier to extend and integrate with other systems. Splunk also has a strong community and ecosystem, but it is more focused on its core product offerings.
In summary, Elasticsearch is a powerful search engine optimized for querying and analyzing structured and unstructured data in real-time, while Splunk is a log management and analysis tool that excels at parsing and indexing machine-generated data for easy log file search and analysis. Elasticsearch provides better scalability and distributed architecture, while Splunk offers a more user-friendly interface and visualization capabilities.
Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?
(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.
Thank you!
Hi Rana, good question! From my Firebase experience, 3 million records is not too big at all, as long as the cost is within reason for you. With Firebase you will be able to access the data from anywhere, including an android app, and implement fine-grained security with JSON rules. The real-time-ness works perfectly. As a fully managed database, Firebase really takes care of everything. The only thing to watch out for is if you need complex query patterns - Firestore (also in the Firebase family) can be a better fit there.
To answer question 2: the right answer will depend on what's most important to you. Algolia is like Firebase is that it is fully-managed, very easy to set up, and has great SDKs for Android. Algolia is really a full-stack search solution in this case, and it is easy to connect with your Firebase data. Bear in mind that Algolia does cost money, so you'll want to make sure the cost is okay for you, but you will save a lot of engineering time and never have to worry about scale. The search-as-you-type performance with Algolia is flawless, as that is a primary aspect of its design. Elasticsearch can store tons of data and has all the flexibility, is hosted for cheap by many cloud services, and has many users. If you haven't done a lot with search before, the learning curve is higher than Algolia for getting the results ranked properly, and there is another learning curve if you want to do the DevOps part yourself. Both are very good platforms for search, Algolia shines when buliding your app is the most important and you don't want to spend many engineering hours, Elasticsearch shines when you have a lot of data and don't mind learning how to run and optimize it.
Rana - we use Cloud Firestore at our startup. It handles many million records without any issues. It provides you the same set of features that the Firebase Realtime Database provides on top of the indexing and security trims. The only thing to watch out for is to make sure your Cloud Functions have proper exception handling and there are no infinite loop in the code. This will be too costly if not caught quickly.
For search; Algolia is a great option, but cost is a real consideration. Indexing large number of records can be cost prohibitive for most projects. Elasticsearch is a solid alternative, but requires a little additional work to configure and maintain if you want to self-host.
Hope this helps.
Pros of Elasticsearch
- Powerful api328
- Great search engine315
- Open source231
- Restful214
- Near real-time search200
- Free98
- Search everything85
- Easy to get started54
- Analytics45
- Distributed26
- Fast search6
- More than a search engine5
- Great docs4
- Awesome, great tool4
- Highly Available3
- Easy to scale3
- Potato2
- Document Store2
- Great customer support2
- Intuitive API2
- Nosql DB2
- Great piece of software2
- Reliable2
- Fast2
- Easy setup2
- Open1
- Easy to get hot data1
- Github1
- Elaticsearch1
- Actively developing1
- Responsive maintainers on GitHub1
- Ecosystem1
- Not stable1
- Scalability1
- Community0
Pros of Splunk
- API for searching logs, running reports3
- Alert system based on custom query results3
- Splunk language supports string, date manip, math, etc2
- Dashboarding on any log contents2
- Custom log parsing as well as automatic parsing2
- Query engine supports joining, aggregation, stats, etc2
- Rich GUI for searching live logs2
- Ability to style search results into reports2
- Granular scheduling and time window support1
- Query any log as key-value pairs1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Elasticsearch
- Resource hungry7
- Diffecult to get started6
- Expensive5
- Hard to keep stable at large scale4
Cons of Splunk
- Splunk query language rich so lots to learn1