StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search As A Service
  5. Elasticsearch vs RavenDB

Elasticsearch vs RavenDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Stacks35.5K
Followers27.1K
Votes1.6K
RavenDB
RavenDB
Stacks79
Followers82
Votes9
GitHub Stars3.9K
Forks850

Elasticsearch vs RavenDB: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Elasticsearch and RavenDB

Elasticsearch and RavenDB are both popular database management systems, but they have some key differences that set them apart. Here are the top six differences:

  1. Data Structure: Elasticsearch is a document-oriented database, while RavenDB is a hybrid database that supports both document-oriented and relational data structures. This means that Elasticsearch stores data in JSON-like documents, while RavenDB can store data in various formats, including documents, graphs, and relational tables.

  2. Scalability: Elasticsearch is designed for horizontal scalability and distributed search capabilities. It automatically shards the data across multiple nodes, allowing for high-performance search operations. In contrast, RavenDB focuses more on vertical scalability and transactional consistency, making it suitable for applications that require strong data consistency and ACID transactions.

  3. Full-Text Search: Elasticsearch is known for its powerful full-text search capabilities. It analyzes text data and enables users to perform complex search queries, including fuzzy search, phrase search, and relevance scoring. RavenDB also supports full-text search but with more limited features compared to Elasticsearch.

  4. Real-Time Analytics: Elasticsearch shines in real-time analytics and log analysis use cases. It can ingest and process large volumes of data in real time, enabling instant search and visualization of the data. RavenDB, on the other hand, is more focused on transactional workloads and doesn't offer the same real-time analytics capabilities as Elasticsearch.

  5. Query Language: Elasticsearch uses its own query language called Query DSL (Domain-Specific Language), which allows for fine-grained control over search queries and aggregations. In contrast, RavenDB supports multiple query languages, including LINQ (Language-Integrated Query) for .NET developers and JavaScript for web-based applications.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Elasticsearch has a large and vibrant community with extensive documentation, plugins, and integrations available. It is widely used and supported by many organizations. RavenDB also has a supportive community but with a smaller user base compared to Elasticsearch. Additionally, Elasticsearch has a broader ecosystem with various tools and libraries built around it.

In summary, Elasticsearch and RavenDB differ in their data structure, scalability, full-text search capabilities, real-time analytics support, query language options, and the size and ecosystem of their respective communities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Elasticsearch, RavenDB

Rana Usman
Rana Usman

Chief Technology Officer at TechAvanza

Jun 4, 2020

Needs adviceonFirebaseFirebaseElasticsearchElasticsearchAlgoliaAlgolia

Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?

(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.

Thank you!

408k views408k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
RavenDB
RavenDB

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

As a document database it remains true to the core principles of these type of storage mechanisms. Somehow it managed to combine the best of relational databases with that of document databases.

Distributed and Highly Available Search Engine;Multi Tenant with Multi Types;Various set of APIs including RESTful;Clients available in many languages including Java, Python, .NET, C#, Groovy, and more;Document oriented;Reliable, Asynchronous Write Behind for long term persistency;(Near) Real Time Search;Built on top of Apache Lucene;Per operation consistency;Inverted indices with finite state transducers for full-text querying;BKD trees for storing numeric and geo data;Column store for analytics;Compatible with Hadoop using the ES-Hadoop connector;Open Source under Apache 2 and Elastic License
Multi-Platform; ACID Transactions
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
850
Stacks
35.5K
Stacks
79
Followers
27.1K
Followers
82
Votes
1.6K
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 329
    Powerful api
  • 315
    Great search engine
  • 231
    Open source
  • 214
    Restful
  • 200
    Near real-time search
Cons
  • 7
    Resource hungry
  • 6
    Diffecult to get started
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 4
    Hard to keep stable at large scale
Pros
  • 4
    Embedded Library
  • 3
    Easy of use
  • 2
    NoSql
Integrations
Kibana
Kibana
Beats
Beats
Logstash
Logstash
Python
Python
Windows
Windows
Java
Java
Ruby
Ruby
Linux
Linux

What are some alternatives to Elasticsearch, RavenDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase