Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Elasticsearch vs Logstash: What are the differences?
Introduction
Elasticsearch and Logstash are both popular tools used in the field of data analysis and management. While Elasticsearch is primarily a search and analytics engine, Logstash is a data processing pipeline. Understanding the key differences between the two can help users choose the right tool for their specific needs.
Data Processing vs. Data Storage: The main difference between Elasticsearch and Logstash lies in their primary function. Elasticsearch is designed to store, search, and analyze data, making it a powerful tool for indexing and retrieving information. On the other hand, Logstash is focused on processing data, enabling users to collect, transform, and enrich their data before it is sent to a storage system like Elasticsearch.
Real-time vs. Batch Processing: Another important distinction is the real-time processing capability of Elasticsearch compared to Logstash's batch processing nature. Elasticsearch provides near real-time search and analytics, allowing users to perform lightning-fast queries and analysis on their data. In contrast, Logstash operates on a batch model, processing data in predefined intervals or when triggered manually.
Data Sources and Inputs: Elasticsearch primarily works with structured data, accepting input from various sources such as JSON, CSV, and SQL databases. It can also integrate with Logstash to receive data from a wider range of sources and inputs, enabling more flexibility in data ingestion. Logstash, however, is designed to handle multiple input types, including logs, metrics, web applications, and more.
Data Transformation and Enrichment: One of the key capabilities of Logstash is its ability to transform and enrich data before it reaches the storage system. It provides a wide range of filters and plugins that can be used to parse, modify, and enhance data during the processing phase. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, focuses more on the storage and retrieval aspects, leaving advanced data transformation to tools like Logstash.
Scalability and High Availability: Elasticsearch is built with scalability and high availability in mind, allowing users to distribute their data and queries across multiple nodes. This ensures fault tolerance and better performance in handling large volumes of data. While Logstash can also be scaled horizontally to some extent, its primary focus is on data processing rather than distributed storage and query optimization.
User Interface and Visualization: Elasticsearch provides a powerful web-based user interface, known as Kibana, which allows users to visualize and explore their data in a highly interactive manner. Kibana offers various visualization options such as charts, graphs, and maps, making it easy to gain insights from Elasticsearch data. Logstash, being a data processing tool, does not provide a built-in user interface for data visualization.
In Summary, Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine focused on data storage, retrieval, and analysis, while Logstash is a data processing pipeline that collects, transforms, and enriches data before it is sent to a storage system. Elasticsearch offers real-time processing, scalability, and a user-friendly interface, while Logstash excels in data transformation, handling a wide range of data sources, and providing flexibility in processing steps.
Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?
(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.
Thank you!
Hi Rana, good question! From my Firebase experience, 3 million records is not too big at all, as long as the cost is within reason for you. With Firebase you will be able to access the data from anywhere, including an android app, and implement fine-grained security with JSON rules. The real-time-ness works perfectly. As a fully managed database, Firebase really takes care of everything. The only thing to watch out for is if you need complex query patterns - Firestore (also in the Firebase family) can be a better fit there.
To answer question 2: the right answer will depend on what's most important to you. Algolia is like Firebase is that it is fully-managed, very easy to set up, and has great SDKs for Android. Algolia is really a full-stack search solution in this case, and it is easy to connect with your Firebase data. Bear in mind that Algolia does cost money, so you'll want to make sure the cost is okay for you, but you will save a lot of engineering time and never have to worry about scale. The search-as-you-type performance with Algolia is flawless, as that is a primary aspect of its design. Elasticsearch can store tons of data and has all the flexibility, is hosted for cheap by many cloud services, and has many users. If you haven't done a lot with search before, the learning curve is higher than Algolia for getting the results ranked properly, and there is another learning curve if you want to do the DevOps part yourself. Both are very good platforms for search, Algolia shines when buliding your app is the most important and you don't want to spend many engineering hours, Elasticsearch shines when you have a lot of data and don't mind learning how to run and optimize it.
Rana - we use Cloud Firestore at our startup. It handles many million records without any issues. It provides you the same set of features that the Firebase Realtime Database provides on top of the indexing and security trims. The only thing to watch out for is to make sure your Cloud Functions have proper exception handling and there are no infinite loop in the code. This will be too costly if not caught quickly.
For search; Algolia is a great option, but cost is a real consideration. Indexing large number of records can be cost prohibitive for most projects. Elasticsearch is a solid alternative, but requires a little additional work to configure and maintain if you want to self-host.
Hope this helps.
Pros of Elasticsearch
- Powerful api328
- Great search engine315
- Open source231
- Restful214
- Near real-time search200
- Free98
- Search everything85
- Easy to get started54
- Analytics45
- Distributed26
- Fast search6
- More than a search engine5
- Great docs4
- Awesome, great tool4
- Highly Available3
- Easy to scale3
- Potato2
- Document Store2
- Great customer support2
- Intuitive API2
- Nosql DB2
- Great piece of software2
- Reliable2
- Fast2
- Easy setup2
- Open1
- Easy to get hot data1
- Github1
- Elaticsearch1
- Actively developing1
- Responsive maintainers on GitHub1
- Ecosystem1
- Not stable1
- Scalability1
- Community0
Pros of Logstash
- Free69
- Easy but powerful filtering18
- Scalable12
- Kibana provides machine learning based analytics to log2
- Great to meet GDPR goals1
- Well Documented1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Elasticsearch
- Resource hungry7
- Diffecult to get started6
- Expensive5
- Hard to keep stable at large scale4
Cons of Logstash
- Memory-intensive4
- Documentation difficult to use1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Elasticsearch?
What is Logstash?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Elasticsearch?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+6
+17
+12
+4
+23+42+47
+39