StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search As A Service
  5. Elasticsearch vs Locust

Elasticsearch vs Locust

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Stacks35.5K
Followers27.1K
Votes1.6K
Locust
Locust
Stacks191
Followers317
Votes51
GitHub Stars27.0K
Forks3.1K

Elasticsearch vs Locust: What are the differences?

  1. Data Storage and Querying: Elasticsearch is a distributed, real-time search and analytics engine designed for storing, searching, and analyzing large volumes of data quickly. It allows for complex queries, full-text search, and real-time data retrieval. On the other hand, Locust is an open-source load testing tool that allows users to define user behavior in Python code, simulate concurrent user activity, and monitor system performance under load. It focuses on load testing web applications and services to check their performance, scalability, and reliability.

  2. Primary Use Case: Elasticsearch is commonly used for log and event data analysis, full-text search, real-time monitoring, metrics analysis, and in application search scenarios. Its versatility makes it suitable for a wide range of use cases including website search, log analysis, security information and event management (SIEM), and more. Locust, on the other hand, is specifically designed for load testing web applications and services. Its primary use case is to simulate a large number of users accessing a system concurrently to identify potential bottlenecks, performance issues, and system weaknesses.

  3. Scaling Capabilities: Elasticsearch is built for scalability and can easily scale horizontally by adding more nodes to a cluster, allowing it to handle large amounts of data and traffic efficiently. It can be deployed across multiple nodes to create a distributed system that can handle high loads and big data scenarios. Locust, on the other hand, is more focused on simulating user behavior under load and does not have native scaling capabilities like Elasticsearch. It mainly runs on a single machine or distributed across multiple machines for heavier load testing scenarios.

  4. Query Language: Elasticsearch uses a powerful query language called Elasticsearch Query DSL, which allows users to construct complex queries using JSON-based syntax. Users can perform searches based on various parameters, filter criteria, aggregations, and sorting options. Locust, on the other hand, uses Python code to define user behavior and simulate user interactions with the system. Users need to define the behavior of virtual users in Python code, specifying tasks, behaviors, and scenarios to be executed during the load testing process.

  5. Monitoring and Analytics: Elasticsearch comes with built-in monitoring and analytics tools that allow users to track cluster health, performance metrics, indexing rates, and other key indicators. It provides insights into system activity, resource usage, query performance, and data distribution across nodes in a cluster. Locust, on the other hand, offers basic monitoring and reporting capabilities to track the number of requests sent, response times, and success/failure rates during load testing. Users can monitor system performance in real-time and generate reports to analyze test results.

In Summary, Elasticsearch and Locust differ in terms of data storage and querying capabilities, primary use cases, scaling capabilities, query languages, and monitoring tools provided.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Elasticsearch, Locust

Rana Usman
Rana Usman

Chief Technology Officer at TechAvanza

Jun 4, 2020

Needs adviceonFirebaseFirebaseElasticsearchElasticsearchAlgoliaAlgolia

Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?

(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.

Thank you!

408k views408k
Comments
Vrashab
Vrashab

QA at Altair

Jun 23, 2020

Needs adviceonGatlingGatlingLocustLocustFlood IOFlood IO

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

142k views142k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Locust
Locust

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Distributed and Highly Available Search Engine;Multi Tenant with Multi Types;Various set of APIs including RESTful;Clients available in many languages including Java, Python, .NET, C#, Groovy, and more;Document oriented;Reliable, Asynchronous Write Behind for long term persistency;(Near) Real Time Search;Built on top of Apache Lucene;Per operation consistency;Inverted indices with finite state transducers for full-text querying;BKD trees for storing numeric and geo data;Column store for analytics;Compatible with Hadoop using the ES-Hadoop connector;Open Source under Apache 2 and Elastic License
Define user behaviour in code;Distributed & scalable;Proven & battle tested
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
27.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.1K
Stacks
35.5K
Stacks
191
Followers
27.1K
Followers
317
Votes
1.6K
Votes
51
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 329
    Powerful api
  • 315
    Great search engine
  • 231
    Open source
  • 214
    Restful
  • 200
    Near real-time search
Cons
  • 7
    Resource hungry
  • 6
    Diffecult to get started
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 4
    Hard to keep stable at large scale
Pros
  • 15
    Hackable
  • 11
    Supports distributed
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Easy to setup
  • 6
    Easy to use
Cons
  • 1
    Bad design
Integrations
Kibana
Kibana
Beats
Beats
Logstash
Logstash
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Elasticsearch, Locust?

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

k6

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Typesense

Typesense

It is an open source, typo tolerant search engine that delivers fast and relevant results out-of-the-box. has been built from scratch to offer a delightful, out-of-the-box search experience. From instant search to autosuggest, to faceted search, it has got you covered.

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch enables you to search large collections of data such as web pages, document files, forum posts, or product information. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create a search domain, upload the data you want to make searchable to Amazon CloudSearch, and the search service automatically provisions the required technology resources and deploys a highly tuned search index.

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service is a fully managed service that makes it easy for you to deploy, secure, and operate Elasticsearch at scale with zero down time.

Manticore Search

Manticore Search

It is a full-text search engine written in C++ and a fork of Sphinx Search. It's designed to be simple to use, light and fast, while allowing advanced full-text searching. Connectivity is provided via a MySQL compatible protocol or HTTP, making it easy to integrate.

Gatling

Gatling

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Loader.io

Loader.io

Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

Azure Search

Azure Search

Azure Search makes it easy to add powerful and sophisticated search capabilities to your website or application. Quickly and easily tune search results and construct rich, fine-tuned ranking models to tie search results to business goals. Reliable throughput and storage provide fast search indexing and querying to support time-sensitive search scenarios.

BlazeMeter

BlazeMeter

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope