StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search As A Service
  5. Elasticsearch vs Gatling

Elasticsearch vs Gatling

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Stacks35.5K
Followers27.1K
Votes1.6K
Gatling
Gatling
Stacks244
Followers318
Votes21
GitHub Stars6.8K
Forks1.2K

Elasticsearch vs Gatling: What are the differences?

Introduction

Elasticsearch and Gatling are two different tools used for different purposes. While Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine, Gatling is a load testing tool. Despite their differences in functionality, there are some key differences between the two:

  1. Scalability: Elasticsearch is built to be highly scalable and can handle large amounts of data and traffic. It can distribute data across multiple nodes in a cluster and can scale horizontally by adding more nodes to the cluster. On the other hand, Gatling focuses on simulating real-world user behavior and load on a system to test its performance. It is not designed to scale horizontally like Elasticsearch.

  2. Primary Use Cases: Elasticsearch is primarily used for full-text search, log analysis, and data analytics. It excels in searching and analyzing large volumes of structured or unstructured data. On the other hand, Gatling is used for load testing, performance testing, and stress testing of web applications. It is used to simulate multiple concurrent users accessing a system and measure its performance under various loads.

  3. Querying and Search Capabilities: Elasticsearch comes with a rich set of querying and search capabilities, including full-text search, fuzzy search, geolocation search, and aggregations. It also supports complex queries and filtering options. Gatling, on the other hand, does not provide any querying or search capabilities as its primary focus is on load testing and performance measurement.

  4. Real-time Data Processing: Elasticsearch is designed to handle real-time data processing and analytics, making it suitable for applications that require real-time insights and analytics. It supports near real-time indexing and has a flexible data model that allows for fast data ingestion and indexing. Gatling, on the other hand, does not provide any real-time data processing capabilities as it focuses on load testing and performance measurement.

  5. Data Storage: Elasticsearch stores data in a distributed manner across multiple nodes in a cluster, providing high availability and fault tolerance. It also supports replication and sharding for data distribution. Gatling, on the other hand, does not store any data as it is a load testing tool. It generates load on a system without storing any data.

  6. Visualization and Reporting: Elasticsearch provides a variety of tools and plugins for data visualization and reporting. It integrates well with popular data visualization tools like Kibana, allowing users to create custom dashboards, visualizations, and reports based on their data. Gatling, on the other hand, does not provide any built-in visualization or reporting tools. Users need to use external tools or libraries to analyze and visualize the test results.

In summary, Elasticsearch and Gatling serve different purposes, with Elasticsearch focusing on search and analytics, while Gatling excels in load testing and performance measurement. They differ in their scalability, primary use cases, querying capabilities, real-time data processing, data storage, and visualization/reporting features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Elasticsearch, Gatling

Rana Usman
Rana Usman

Chief Technology Officer at TechAvanza

Jun 4, 2020

Needs adviceonFirebaseFirebaseElasticsearchElasticsearchAlgoliaAlgolia

Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?

(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.

Thank you!

408k views408k
Comments
Vrashab
Vrashab

QA at Altair

Jun 23, 2020

Needs adviceonGatlingGatlingLocustLocustFlood IOFlood IO

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

142k views142k
Comments
Aravinth
Aravinth

SSE

Nov 19, 2019

Needs advice

I want to do performance testing with HTTP protocol but the test script should be java script. For now, I kept "Artillery" and "K6" tools in my queue. Did you guys have any idea about this? Is there any tools which support Test script language: JavaScript Protocol: Http/web service Must Feature: Record OS: Mac os/windows

84.4k views84.4k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Gatling
Gatling

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Distributed and Highly Available Search Engine;Multi Tenant with Multi Types;Various set of APIs including RESTful;Clients available in many languages including Java, Python, .NET, C#, Groovy, and more;Document oriented;Reliable, Asynchronous Write Behind for long term persistency;(Near) Real Time Search;Built on top of Apache Lucene;Per operation consistency;Inverted indices with finite state transducers for full-text querying;BKD trees for storing numeric and geo data;Column store for analytics;Compatible with Hadoop using the ES-Hadoop connector;Open Source under Apache 2 and Elastic License
Simulating heavy traffic; Load testing as code for CI/CD integration & automation; API Load testing; Automated deployment of load injectors; Response times reports
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
6.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
35.5K
Stacks
244
Followers
27.1K
Followers
318
Votes
1.6K
Votes
21
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 329
    Powerful api
  • 315
    Great search engine
  • 231
    Open source
  • 214
    Restful
  • 200
    Near real-time search
Cons
  • 7
    Resource hungry
  • 6
    Diffecult to get started
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 4
    Hard to keep stable at large scale
Pros
  • 6
    Great detailed reports
  • 5
    Loadrunner
  • 5
    Can run in cluster mode
  • 3
    Scala based
  • 2
    Load test as code
Cons
  • 2
    Steep Learning Curve
  • 1
    Hard to test non-supported protocols
  • 0
    Not distributed
Integrations
Kibana
Kibana
Beats
Beats
Logstash
Logstash
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Elasticsearch, Gatling?

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

k6

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Locust

Locust

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Typesense

Typesense

It is an open source, typo tolerant search engine that delivers fast and relevant results out-of-the-box. has been built from scratch to offer a delightful, out-of-the-box search experience. From instant search to autosuggest, to faceted search, it has got you covered.

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch enables you to search large collections of data such as web pages, document files, forum posts, or product information. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create a search domain, upload the data you want to make searchable to Amazon CloudSearch, and the search service automatically provisions the required technology resources and deploys a highly tuned search index.

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service is a fully managed service that makes it easy for you to deploy, secure, and operate Elasticsearch at scale with zero down time.

Manticore Search

Manticore Search

It is a full-text search engine written in C++ and a fork of Sphinx Search. It's designed to be simple to use, light and fast, while allowing advanced full-text searching. Connectivity is provided via a MySQL compatible protocol or HTTP, making it easy to integrate.

Loader.io

Loader.io

Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

Azure Search

Azure Search

Azure Search makes it easy to add powerful and sophisticated search capabilities to your website or application. Quickly and easily tune search results and construct rich, fine-tuned ranking models to tie search results to business goals. Reliable throughput and storage provide fast search indexing and querying to support time-sensitive search scenarios.

BlazeMeter

BlazeMeter

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope