StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search As A Service
  5. Elassandra vs Elasticsearch

Elassandra vs Elasticsearch

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Stacks35.5K
Followers27.1K
Votes1.6K
Elassandra
Elassandra
Stacks5
Followers36
Votes3

Elassandra vs Elasticsearch: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will highlight six key differences between Elassandra and Elasticsearch, two popular search and analytics platforms.

  1. Scalability and Performance: Elassandra provides a scalable and high-performance solution by combining the distributed search capabilities of Elasticsearch with the distributed storage and query capabilities of Apache Cassandra. It ensures efficient data replication and distribution across a cluster of nodes, resulting in improved scalability and performance compared to Elasticsearch alone.

  2. Data Model: Elassandra integrates Cassandra's columnar data model with Elasticsearch's inverted index data structure. This allows Elassandra to offer flexible data modeling options, supporting both document-based and wide-column-based data models. In contrast, Elasticsearch primarily uses a document-based data model with JSON-like documents.

  3. Data Storage: Elassandra leverages Cassandra's distributed storage architecture, providing fault tolerance and high availability for data storage. It uses Cassandra's SSTable format for storage and integrates it with Elasticsearch's index structures. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, uses its own file-based storage system called Lucene, optimized for full-text search.

  4. Data Consistency and Replication: Elassandra inherits Cassandra's strong data consistency and replication capabilities. It ensures data replication across multiple nodes in a cluster, providing fault tolerance and data redundancy. Elasticsearch, while also supporting data replication and high availability, relies on its own cluster coordination mechanisms such as sharding and replication.

  5. Query Language and APIs: Both Elassandra and Elasticsearch support the Elasticsearch Query DSL (Domain-Specific Language) for querying and searching data. However, due to the integration with Cassandra, Elassandra also supports the Cassandra Query Language (CQL), allowing users to leverage existing CQL knowledge and tools for data manipulation.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Elasticsearch has a larger and more mature community with extensive support, documentation, and third-party integrations. It has a wide range of plugins and extensions available for various use cases. Elassandra, while benefiting from the Elasticsearch ecosystem, has a smaller community focus, primarily offering the combined benefits of Cassandra and Elasticsearch.

In Summary, Elassandra combines the scalable and distributed search capabilities of Elasticsearch with the flexible data modeling and fault-tolerant storage capabilities of Cassandra, providing a unique search and analytics solution.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Elasticsearch, Elassandra

Rana Usman
Rana Usman

Chief Technology Officer at TechAvanza

Jun 4, 2020

Needs adviceonFirebaseFirebaseElasticsearchElasticsearchAlgoliaAlgolia

Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?

(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.

Thank you!

408k views408k
Comments
André
André

Nov 20, 2020

Needs adviceonElasticsearchElasticsearchAmazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

Hi, community, I'm planning to build a web service that will perform a text search in a data set off less than 3k well-structured JSON objects containing config data. I'm expecting no more than 20 MB of data. The general traits I need for this search are:

  • Typo tolerant (fuzzy query), so it has to match the entries even though the query does not match 100% with a word on that JSON
  • Allow a strict match mode
  • Perform the search through all the JSON values (it can reach 6 nesting levels)
  • Ignore all Keys of the JSON; I'm interested only in the values.

The only thing I'm researching at the moment is Elasticsearch, and since the rest of the stack is on AWS the Amazon ElasticSearch is my favorite candidate so far. Although, the only knowledge I have on it was fetched from some articles and Q&A that I read here and there. Is ElasticSearch a good path for this project? I'm also considering Amazon DynamoDB (which I also don't know of), but it does not look to cover the requirements of fuzzy-search and ignore the JSON properties. Thank you in advance for your precious advice!

60.3k views60.3k
Comments
Ted
Ted

Computer Science

Dec 19, 2020

Review

I think elasticsearch should be a great fit for that use case. Using the AWS version will make your life easier. With such a small dataset you may also be able to use an in process library for searching and possibly remove the overhead of using a database. I don’t if it fits the bill, but you may also want to look into lucene.

I can tell you that Dynamo DB is definitely not a good fit for your use case. There is no fuzzy matching feature and you would need to have an index for each field you want to search or convert your data into a more searchable format for storing in Dynamo, which is something a full text search tool like elasticsearch is going to do for you.

42.9k views42.9k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Elassandra
Elassandra

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

Elassandra is a fork of Elasticsearch modified to run on top of Apache Cassandra in a scalable and resilient peer-to-peer architecture. Elasticsearch code is embedded in Cassanda nodes providing advanced search features on Cassandra tables and Cassandra serve as an Elasticsearch data and configuration store.

Distributed and Highly Available Search Engine;Multi Tenant with Multi Types;Various set of APIs including RESTful;Clients available in many languages including Java, Python, .NET, C#, Groovy, and more;Document oriented;Reliable, Asynchronous Write Behind for long term persistency;(Near) Real Time Search;Built on top of Apache Lucene;Per operation consistency;Inverted indices with finite state transducers for full-text querying;BKD trees for storing numeric and geo data;Column store for analytics;Compatible with Hadoop using the ES-Hadoop connector;Open Source under Apache 2 and Elastic License
-
Statistics
Stacks
35.5K
Stacks
5
Followers
27.1K
Followers
36
Votes
1.6K
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 329
    Powerful api
  • 315
    Great search engine
  • 231
    Open source
  • 214
    Restful
  • 200
    Near real-time search
Cons
  • 7
    Resource hungry
  • 6
    Diffecult to get started
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 4
    Hard to keep stable at large scale
Pros
  • 1
    Multi-master search engine
  • 1
    Well known API
  • 1
    Microservice database and search engine
Integrations
Kibana
Kibana
Beats
Beats
Logstash
Logstash
Cassandra
Cassandra

What are some alternatives to Elasticsearch, Elassandra?

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

Solr

Solr

Solr is the popular, blazing fast open source enterprise search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search, near real-time indexing, dynamic clustering, database integration, rich document (e.g., Word, PDF) handling, and geospatial search. Solr is highly reliable, scalable and fault tolerant, providing distributed indexing, replication and load-balanced querying, automated failover and recovery, centralized configuration and more. Solr powers the search and navigation features of many of the world's largest internet sites.

Typesense

Typesense

It is an open source, typo tolerant search engine that delivers fast and relevant results out-of-the-box. has been built from scratch to offer a delightful, out-of-the-box search experience. From instant search to autosuggest, to faceted search, it has got you covered.

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch enables you to search large collections of data such as web pages, document files, forum posts, or product information. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create a search domain, upload the data you want to make searchable to Amazon CloudSearch, and the search service automatically provisions the required technology resources and deploys a highly tuned search index.

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service is a fully managed service that makes it easy for you to deploy, secure, and operate Elasticsearch at scale with zero down time.

Manticore Search

Manticore Search

It is a full-text search engine written in C++ and a fork of Sphinx Search. It's designed to be simple to use, light and fast, while allowing advanced full-text searching. Connectivity is provided via a MySQL compatible protocol or HTTP, making it easy to integrate.

Azure Search

Azure Search

Azure Search makes it easy to add powerful and sophisticated search capabilities to your website or application. Quickly and easily tune search results and construct rich, fine-tuned ranking models to tie search results to business goals. Reliable throughput and storage provide fast search indexing and querying to support time-sensitive search scenarios.

Swiftype

Swiftype

Swiftype is the easiest way to add great search to your website or mobile application.

MeiliSearch

MeiliSearch

It is a powerful, fast, open-source, easy to use, and deploy search engine. The search and indexation are fully customizable and handles features like typo-tolerance, filters, and synonyms.

Quickwit

Quickwit

It is the next-gen search & analytics engine built for logs. It is designed from the ground up to offer cost-efficiency and high reliability on large data sets. Its benefits are most apparent in multi-tenancy or multi-index settings.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope