StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Media Processing
  4. File Conversion
  5. Ebook Glue vs Tesseract OCR

Ebook Glue vs Tesseract OCR

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ebook Glue
Ebook Glue
Stacks0
Followers5
Votes0
Tesseract OCR
Tesseract OCR
Stacks96
Followers286
Votes7
GitHub Stars70.7K
Forks10.4K

Ebook Glue vs Tesseract OCR: What are the differences?

Write Introduction here
  1. Cost: One key difference between Ebook Glue and Tesseract OCR is cost. Ebook Glue is a paid service that offers a variety of pricing plans based on the user's needs, while Tesseract OCR is an open-source tool that is free to use, making it more cost-effective for those on a tight budget.

  2. Supported File Types: Another significant difference is in the supported file types. Ebook Glue specializes in converting HTML into various Ebook formats, making it ideal for authors and publishers. On the other hand, Tesseract OCR is primarily designed for converting scanned documents and images into editable text, which is more suitable for researchers and businesses dealing with large volumes of documents.

  3. Ease of Use: Ebook Glue is known for its user-friendly interface and straightforward conversion process, making it easy for even non-technical users to create Ebooks quickly. In contrast, Tesseract OCR can be more complex to set up and use due to its advanced features and customization options, requiring more technical expertise to operate effectively.

  4. Accuracy: When it comes to accuracy, Tesseract OCR is known for its high level of accuracy in recognizing text from scanned documents and images, making it a preferred choice for OCR tasks where precision is crucial. In comparison, Ebook Glue may not provide the same level of accuracy, as its primary focus is on converting HTML content into Ebook formats rather than text recognition from images.

  5. Customization Options: Tesseract OCR offers extensive customization options, allowing users to fine-tune the OCR process for specific projects or languages, enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of text recognition. Ebook Glue, on the other hand, may have limited customization features, as its primary function is to convert HTML content into Ebooks with predefined templates and styles.

  6. Integration Abilities: Tesseract OCR can be integrated into various applications and platforms through APIs, enabling developers to incorporate OCR capabilities seamlessly into their software solutions. On the contrary, Ebook Glue may not offer the same level of integration options, as it is more focused on standalone Ebook conversion services rather than integration with third-party tools.

In Summary, Ebook Glue and Tesseract OCR differ in cost, supported file types, ease of use, accuracy, customization options, and integration abilities, catering to different needs in the digital content creation and OCR fields.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Ebook Glue, Tesseract OCR

Vladyslav
Vladyslav

Sr. Directory of Technology at Shelf

Oct 25, 2019

Decided

AWS Rekognition has an OCR feature but can recognize only up to 50 words per image, which is a deal-breaker for us. (see my tweet).

Also, we discovered fantastic speed and quality improvements in the 4.x versions of Tesseract. Meanwhile, the quality of AWS Rekognition's OCR remains to be mediocre in comparison.

We run Tesseract serverlessly in AWS Lambda via aws-lambda-tesseract library that we made open-source.

53.3k views53.3k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ebook Glue
Ebook Glue
Tesseract OCR
Tesseract OCR

Ebook Glue solves a simple frustration: difficulty in publishing content for electronic reading devices. It started off as a small side project, and has evolved into a growing web application that thousands of people rely on to publish their content online.

Tesseract was originally developed at Hewlett-Packard Laboratories Bristol and at Hewlett-Packard Co, Greeley Colorado between 1985 and 1994, with some more changes made in 1996 to port to Windows, and some C++izing in 1998. In 2005 Tesseract was open sourced by HP. Since 2006 it is developed by Google.

Integrate in Minutes- Ebook Glue is extremely easy to use and get started. You can convert an ebook in your terminal in seconds, and integrate with your web app in minutes.;Scale With Ease- Ebook conversions and file creation can involve a lot of I/O-heavy operations that don’t scale well on many cloud server providers. If you offload the computation to Ebook Glue, you can worry less about the scalability of your app.;Get Your Content Everywhere- Ebook Glue allows your users to read your content like a book - they can make highlights and take notes as they read, providing a more immersive reading experience.;Simple HTTP API- Ebook Glue can integrate with almost any web application because of its simple HTTP API. It doesn’t restrict you to a specific programming language or framework.;Delight Readers- Ebook Glue allows you to create ebooks that display beautifully on a wide range of devices. We provide device-specific style filters to adjust the font size, margins, and line spacing to optimize the reading experience on different devices.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
70.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
10.4K
Stacks
0
Stacks
96
Followers
5
Followers
286
Votes
0
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 5
    Building training set is easy
  • 2
    Very lightweight library
Cons
  • 1
    Works best with white background and black text
Integrations
Heroku
Heroku
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Ebook Glue, Tesseract OCR?

Google Cloud Vision API

Google Cloud Vision API

Google Cloud Vision API enables developers to understand the content of an image by encapsulating powerful machine learning models in an easy to use REST API.

DocRaptor

DocRaptor

DocRaptor makes it easy to convert HTML to PDF and XLS format. Choose your document format, select configuration options and make an HTTP POST request to our server. DocRaptor returns your file in a matter of seconds. We provide extensive documentation and examples to get you started, and our API makes it easy to use DocRaptor to generate PDF and Excel files in your own web applications.

Amazon Rekognition

Amazon Rekognition

Amazon Rekognition is a service that makes it easy to add image analysis to your applications. With Rekognition, you can detect objects, scenes, and faces in images. You can also search and compare faces. Rekognition’s API enables you to quickly add sophisticated deep learning-based visual search and image classification to your applications.

Pandoc

Pandoc

It is a free and open-source document converter, widely used as a writing tool and as a basis for publishing workflows. It converts files from one markup format into another. It can convert documents in (several dialects of) Markdown, reStructuredText, textile, HTML, DocBook, LaTeX, MediaWiki markup, TWiki and many more.

Tesseract.js

Tesseract.js

This library supports over 60 languages, automatic text orientation and script detection, a simple interface for reading paragraph, word, and character bounding boxes. Tesseract.js can run either in a browser and on a server with NodeJS.

Editaimg: Edit and enhance photos with AI Image Editor

Editaimg: Edit and enhance photos with AI Image Editor

Editaimg helps you edit images with AI: remove backgrounds, edit text on images, upscale resolution, retouch faces, and export in popular formats.

Inkfluence AI

Inkfluence AI

Plan, write, and publish books, PDF guides, workbooks, and audiobooks with AI workflows. Customize branding and export instantly.

PDFGate

PDFGate

PDFGate is a developer-focused PDF API for generating and managing PDFs from applications. It supports HTML-to-PDF conversion, fillable PDF form fields, and a growing set of PDF utilities designed for backend workflows. The API is built for reliability and precision, making it suitable for invoices, contracts, reports, and other transactional documents. PDFGate emphasizes modern API design, predictable rendering, and features often missing from simpler HTML-to-PDF services, such as native support for interactive form fields. It is designed for teams that need more than basic PDF generation, with a roadmap that includes digital signatures, SDKs, and additional PDF processing endpoints.

Test

Test

Test

2dto3D

2dto3D

Upload any image and get a downloadable 3D model in minutes. AI-powered image to 3D conversion with professional quality GLB files. Built by people who actually use 3D tools.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase