StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Drone.io vs Travis CI

Drone.io vs Travis CI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Travis CI
Travis CI
Stacks28.0K
Followers6.7K
Votes1.7K
Drone.io
Drone.io
Stacks884
Followers456
Votes258

Drone.io vs Travis CI: What are the differences?

Introduction

Drone.io and Travis CI are both popular Continuous Integration (CI) platforms that enable developers to automatically build, test, and deploy software projects. However, there are several key differences between the two platforms.

1. Deployment Options: Drone.io provides a wider range of deployment options compared to Travis CI. While Travis CI supports deployment to various platforms, such as AWS, Heroku, and Google App Engine, Drone.io offers additional options like Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, and custom shell scripts. This flexibility allows developers to choose the most suitable deployment strategy for their applications.

2. Containerization: Unlike Travis CI, which runs builds in virtual machines, Drone.io is designed around containerization. It leverages Docker containers to isolate builds, making it easier to distribute and reproduce build environments. This container-based approach provides a consistent and reproducible build environment, resulting in more reliable and trustworthy builds.

3. Self-Hosted/On-Premise Option: While both platforms offer hosted versions, Drone.io also provides a self-hosted option for organizations that prefer to run their CI infrastructure on-premise or on a private cloud. This self-hosted option allows greater control and security of the CI environment, making it a preferred choice for companies with strict compliance or regulatory requirements.

4. Plugin and Extension Ecosystem: Travis CI has a large and mature ecosystem of plugins and extensions that developers can leverage to enhance their CI pipelines. However, Drone.io has a more extensible and flexible plugin system, with the ability to create custom plugins using any programming language. This versatility enables developers to seamlessly integrate their existing workflows and tools into the CI pipeline.

5. Configuration as Code: While both platforms allow configuring builds through YAML files, Drone.io takes configuration as code to the next level. It uses a Docker-compose-like syntax for defining build steps and can also execute arbitrary shell commands. This granular control over build configuration makes it easier to define complex build pipelines and customize the build process according to specific requirements.

6. Pricing Model: Drone.io follows a different pricing model compared to Travis CI. While Travis CI offers a free tier for open-source projects and limited builds per month, Drone.io offers unlimited builds and repositories for free. However, Drone.io charges based on the number of concurrent build agents required for larger or enterprise-scale projects, whereas Travis CI offers different plans based on the number of concurrent jobs.

In summary, Drone.io differentiates itself from Travis CI by offering a wider range of deployment options, a container-based approach, a self-hosted option, a more extensible plugin system, powerful configuration as code capabilities, and a distinctive pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Travis CI, Drone.io

Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments
Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Travis CI
Travis CI
Drone.io
Drone.io

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Easy Setup- Getting started with Travis CI is as easy as enabling a project, adding basic build instructions to your project and committing code.;Supports Your Platform- Lots of databases and services are pre-installed and can simply be enabled in your build configuration, we'll launch them for you automatically. MySQL, PostgreSQL, ElasticSearch, Redis, Riak, RabbitMQ, Memcached are available by default.;Deploy With Confidence- Deploying to production after a successful build is as easy as setting up a bit of configuration, and we'll deploy your code to Heroku, Engine Yard Cloud, Nodejitsu, cloudControl, OpenShift, and CloudFoundry.
Free for open-source;GitHub, BitBucket integration;Browser testing;Deplot with Amazon, Heroku, Google AppEngine;Flexible scripting;Team billing;
Statistics
Stacks
28.0K
Stacks
884
Followers
6.7K
Followers
456
Votes
1.7K
Votes
258
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 506
    Github integration
  • 388
    Free for open source
  • 271
    Easy to get started
  • 191
    Nice interface
  • 162
    Automatic deployment
Cons
  • 8
    Can't be hosted insternally
  • 3
    Unstable
  • 3
    Feature lacking
  • 2
    Incomplete documentation for all platforms
Pros
  • 51
    Open source
  • 50
    Built on docker
  • 27
    Free for open source
  • 23
    GitHub integration
  • 18
    Easy Setup
Cons
  • 3
    Very basic documentation
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Heroku
Heroku
AWS CodeDeploy
AWS CodeDeploy
MySQL
MySQL
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Nodejitsu
Nodejitsu
npm
npm
GitHub
GitHub
Engine Yard Cloud
Engine Yard Cloud
cloudControl
cloudControl
Docker
Docker
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Heroku
Heroku
GitHub
GitHub
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
dotCloud
dotCloud

What are some alternatives to Travis CI, Drone.io?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Appveyor

Appveyor

AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana