Drone.io vs Portainer

Overview

Drone.io

Stacks884

Followers456

Votes258

Portainer

Stacks507

Followers842

Votes146

Drone.io vs Portainer: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This markdown will provide key differences between Drone.io and Portainer.

Deployment Method: Drone.io is a continuous integration and delivery platform deployed as a server that runs on your infrastructure, giving more control over resources and security. On the other hand, Portainer is a container management tool that can be deployed as a container itself, offering a simpler setup process and easier scalability.
Scope of Functionality: Drone.io primarily focuses on continuous integration and delivery processes, offering robust pipeline capabilities for automated testing and deployment. In contrast, Portainer is more of a container management platform, providing a user-friendly interface for managing containers, volumes, networks, and images across different orchestration platforms like Kubernetes, Docker, and others.
User Interface: Drone.io's user interface is tailored towards developers and DevOps teams, providing a streamlined pipeline configuration and monitoring experience. In contrast, Portainer offers a visual dashboard that caters to a broader audience, including administrators and less technical users, with features for managing containers in a more visual way.
Supported Integrations: Drone.io boasts a strong integration ecosystem, with support for various version control systems, cloud providers, and notification services, allowing for seamless automation and collaboration within the CI/CD pipeline. Portainer focuses on integrations with popular container platforms, offering compatibility with Docker, Kubernetes, and Swarm, among others, for container management tasks.
Community Support: Drone.io has a dedicated community actively contributing to its development and providing support through forums, GitHub repositories, and community plugins, fostering a vibrant ecosystem around the platform. Portainer, while also having a supportive user base, places more emphasis on enterprise support and services, catering to larger organizations with complex container management needs.
Scalability: Drone.io is known for its scalability, capable of handling large-scale CI/CD pipelines and accommodating growing development teams with ease, making it a preferred choice for organizations with evolving infrastructure requirements. Portainer, while offering scalability features, is more focused on ease of use and management, ensuring that users can efficiently manage containers without compromising on performance or stability.

In Summary, the key differences between Drone.io and Portainer lie in their deployment methods, scope of functionality, user interfaces, supported integrations, community support, and scalability features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Drone.io, Portainer

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Drone.io	Portainer
Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.	It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.
Free for open-source;GitHub, BitBucket integration;Browser testing;Deplot with Amazon, Heroku, Google AppEngine;Flexible scripting;Team billing;	Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Statistics
Stacks 884	Stacks 507
Followers 456	Followers 842
Votes 258	Votes 146
Pros & Cons
Pros 51 Open source 50 Built on docker 27 Free for open source 23 GitHub integration 18 Easy Setup Cons 3 Very basic documentation	Pros 36 Simple 27 Great UI 19 Friendly 12 Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker 11 Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
Integrations
Docker Bitbucket Google App Engine Heroku GitHub Amazon S3 dotCloud	Docker Swarm Docker Secrets Auth0 Kubernetes Docker

What are some alternatives to Drone.io, Portainer?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

Drone.io vs Portainer: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This markdown will provide key differences between Drone.io and Portainer.

Deployment Method: Drone.io is a continuous integration and delivery platform deployed as a server that runs on your infrastructure, giving more control over resources and security. On the other hand, Portainer is a container management tool that can be deployed as a container itself, offering a simpler setup process and easier scalability.
Scope of Functionality: Drone.io primarily focuses on continuous integration and delivery processes, offering robust pipeline capabilities for automated testing and deployment. In contrast, Portainer is more of a container management platform, providing a user-friendly interface for managing containers, volumes, networks, and images across different orchestration platforms like Kubernetes, Docker, and others.
User Interface: Drone.io's user interface is tailored towards developers and DevOps teams, providing a streamlined pipeline configuration and monitoring experience. In contrast, Portainer offers a visual dashboard that caters to a broader audience, including administrators and less technical users, with features for managing containers in a more visual way.
Supported Integrations: Drone.io boasts a strong integration ecosystem, with support for various version control systems, cloud providers, and notification services, allowing for seamless automation and collaboration within the CI/CD pipeline. Portainer focuses on integrations with popular container platforms, offering compatibility with Docker, Kubernetes, and Swarm, among others, for container management tasks.
Community Support: Drone.io has a dedicated community actively contributing to its development and providing support through forums, GitHub repositories, and community plugins, fostering a vibrant ecosystem around the platform. Portainer, while also having a supportive user base, places more emphasis on enterprise support and services, catering to larger organizations with complex container management needs.
Scalability: Drone.io is known for its scalability, capable of handling large-scale CI/CD pipelines and accommodating growing development teams with ease, making it a preferred choice for organizations with evolving infrastructure requirements. Portainer, while offering scalability features, is more focused on ease of use and management, ensuring that users can efficiently manage containers without compromising on performance or stability.

Drone.io vs Portainer

Overview

Drone.io vs Portainer: What are the differences?