StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtual Machine Management
  5. Docker Compose vs Vagrant

Docker Compose vs Vagrant

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vagrant
Vagrant
Stacks11.9K
Followers7.8K
Votes1.5K
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K

Docker Compose vs Vagrant: What are the differences?

Introduction

Docker Compose and Vagrant are both popular tools used in the software development and deployment process. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two. In this article, we will outline the top six differences between Docker Compose and Vagrant.

  1. Deployment Approach: Docker Compose is a tool that creates and manages multi-container Docker applications, allowing for orchestrated deployment of services. It focuses on containerization and allows developers to define the composition of services in a docker-compose.yml file. On the other hand, Vagrant is a tool for creating and managing development environments, which includes provisioning virtual machines rather than containers.

  2. Resource Utilization: Docker Compose leverages containerization to achieve efficient resource utilization. Containers are lightweight and share the host system's kernel, leading to better resource usage and faster startup times. Vagrant, however, creates more heavyweight virtual machines that require more resources in terms of memory and storage.

  3. Isolation: Docker Compose provides a higher level of isolation between services by running them in separate containers while allowing them to communicate with each other. This ensures that changes in one service do not affect the others. Vagrant, on the other hand, provides isolated development environments in the form of virtual machines, which have a higher degree of isolation compared to containers.

  4. Portability: Docker Compose promotes portability by encapsulating the application and its dependencies into containers. This allows developers to build and ship a consistent runtime environment across different machines and platforms. Vagrant also promotes portability, but at the level of virtual machines, which can be easily replicated and shared across different development environments.

  5. Performance: Docker Compose, due to its reliance on containers, offers faster startup times and better performance compared to Vagrant, which requires the booting of virtual machines. Containers have lower overhead and share the host system's resources, resulting in quicker initialization and better overall performance.

  6. Ecosystem and Community: Docker Compose is part of the broader Docker ecosystem, which is widely adopted and supported by a large community. This means that developers can benefit from a vast array of pre-built Docker images and community-driven tools. Vagrant, while also having a significant user base, has a more focused community around virtual machine management and provisioning.

In summary, Docker Compose and Vagrant differ in their deployment approach, resource utilization, isolation level, portability, performance, and ecosystem. Docker Compose focuses on containerization and service orchestration, offering better resource utilization and performance, while Vagrant specializes in creating and managing development environments using virtual machines, providing a higher level of isolation and a focused community around virtual machine management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vagrant
Vagrant
Docker Compose
Docker Compose

Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Boxes;Up And SSH;Synced Folders;Provisioning;Networking;Share;Teardown;Rebuild;Providers
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.5K
Stacks
11.9K
Stacks
22.3K
Followers
7.8K
Followers
16.5K
Votes
1.5K
Votes
501
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 352
    Development environments
  • 290
    Simple bootstraping
  • 237
    Free
  • 139
    Boxes
  • 130
    Provisioning
Cons
  • 2
    Multiple VMs quickly eat up disk space
  • 2
    Can become v complex w prod. provisioner (Salt, etc.)
  • 1
    Development environment that kills your battery
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Integrations
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
HP Cloud Compute
HP Cloud Compute
Joyent Cloud
Joyent Cloud
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
SoftLayer
SoftLayer
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Vagrant, Docker Compose?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

boot2docker

boot2docker

boot2docker is a lightweight Linux distribution based on Tiny Core Linux made specifically to run Docker containers. It runs completely from RAM, weighs ~27MB and boots in ~5s (YMMV).

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Otto

Otto

Otto automatically builds development environments without any configuration; it can detect your project type and has built-in knowledge of industry-standard tools to setup a development environment that is ready to go. When you're ready to deploy, otto builds and manages an infrastructure, sets up servers, builds, and deploys the application.

libvirt

libvirt

It is an open-source API, daemon and management tool for managing platform virtualization. It can be used to manage KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi, QEMU and other virtualization technologies.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana