StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Debezium vs Kafka

Debezium vs Kafka

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kafka
Kafka
Stacks24.2K
Followers22.3K
Votes607
GitHub Stars31.2K
Forks14.8K
Debezium
Debezium
Stacks122
Followers121
Votes0
GitHub Stars12.0K
Forks2.8K

Debezium vs Kafka: What are the differences?

Introduction

Debezium and Kafka are both widely used tools in the field of data streaming and real-time data processing. While they have some similarities, there are also key differences between the two.

  1. Data Integration Approach: Debezium is an open-source distributed platform that captures and streams events from various databases, allowing for real-time data integration and change data capture. On the other hand, Kafka is a distributed event streaming platform that acts as a messaging system, efficiently storing and processing real-time events.

  2. Change Data Capture (CDC) vs. Messaging: Debezium is specifically designed for change data capture, which means it captures and streams only the changes that occur in a database, providing detailed information about each change. Kafka, on the other hand, is a more general-purpose messaging system that allows producers to send messages to topics, which can then be subscribed to by consumers.

  3. Database Integration: Debezium supports integration with various databases, including popular ones like Oracle, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and MongoDB. It uses database-specific connectors to capture the changes in these databases and stream them in real-time. On the other hand, Kafka is a more database-agnostic platform that can be integrated with any database using custom connectors.

  4. Fault Tolerance and Scalability: Debezium provides fault tolerance and scalability by distributing the workload across multiple instances and providing high availability. It also supports fault recovery and data recovery mechanisms. Kafka, being a highly scalable and fault-tolerant platform, provides replication and partitioning features to ensure fault tolerance and scalability.

  5. Event Processing: Debezium focuses on capturing and streaming the events from databases, with built-in support for event schema evolution. It provides features like data transformation and filtering. Kafka, on the other hand, provides a more generalized event processing framework, enabling complex event processing, stream processing, and real-time analytics.

  6. Ecosystem and Tooling: Debezium is tightly integrated with the Apache Kafka ecosystem, leveraging the Kafka Connect framework for data integration. It also provides various connectors to integrate with other tools and platforms like Apache Hadoop and Apache Spark. Kafka, being a mature and widely adopted platform, has a large ecosystem and tooling support from various vendors and projects.

In summary, Debezium is a change data capture platform specifically designed for database integration, while Kafka is a more general-purpose event streaming platform that focuses on messaging and event processing. Debezium captures and streams detailed changes in databases, while Kafka provides fault tolerance, scalability, and a variety of event processing capabilities. Both tools have their distinct advantages and use cases in the field of real-time data processing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Kafka, Debezium

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
Ishfaq
Ishfaq

Feb 28, 2020

Needs advice

Our backend application is sending some external messages to a third party application at the end of each backend (CRUD) API call (from UI) and these external messages take too much extra time (message building, processing, then sent to the third party and log success/failure), UI application has no concern to these extra third party messages.

So currently we are sending these third party messages by creating a new child thread at end of each REST API call so UI application doesn't wait for these extra third party API calls.

I want to integrate Apache Kafka for these extra third party API calls, so I can also retry on failover third party API calls in a queue(currently third party messages are sending from multiple threads at the same time which uses too much processing and resources) and logging, etc.

Question 1: Is this a use case of a message broker?

Question 2: If it is then Kafka vs RabitMQ which is the better?

804k views804k
Comments
Roman
Roman

Senior Back-End Developer, Software Architect

Feb 12, 2019

ReviewonKafkaKafka

I use Kafka because it has almost infinite scaleability in terms of processing events (could be scaled to process hundreds of thousands of events), great monitoring (all sorts of metrics are exposed via JMX).

Downsides of using Kafka are:

  • you have to deal with Zookeeper
  • you have to implement advanced routing yourself (compared to RabbitMQ it has no advanced routing)
10.8k views10.8k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Kafka
Kafka
Debezium
Debezium

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

Start it up, point it at your databases, and your apps can start responding to all of the inserts, updates, and deletes that other apps commit to your databases. It is durable and fast, so your apps can respond quickly and never miss an event, even when things go wrong.

Written at LinkedIn in Scala;Used by LinkedIn to offload processing of all page and other views;Defaults to using persistence, uses OS disk cache for hot data (has higher throughput then any of the above having persistence enabled);Supports both on-line as off-line processing
Do more with your data; Simplify your apps; Never miss a beat; React quickly
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.2K
GitHub Stars
12.0K
GitHub Forks
14.8K
GitHub Forks
2.8K
Stacks
24.2K
Stacks
122
Followers
22.3K
Followers
121
Votes
607
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 126
    High-throughput
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 92
    Scalable
  • 86
    High-Performance
  • 66
    Durable
Cons
  • 32
    Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
  • 29
    Needs Zookeeper
  • 9
    Operational difficulties
  • 5
    Terrible Packaging
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
MariaDB
MariaDB
MongoDB
MongoDB
OctoSQL
OctoSQL
SQLite
SQLite

What are some alternatives to Kafka, Debezium?

dbForge Studio for MySQL

dbForge Studio for MySQL

It is the universal MySQL and MariaDB client for database management, administration and development. With the help of this intelligent MySQL client the work with data and code has become easier and more convenient. This tool provides utilities to compare, synchronize, and backup MySQL databases with scheduling, and gives possibility to analyze and report MySQL tables data.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

dbForge Studio for Oracle

dbForge Studio for Oracle

It is a powerful integrated development environment (IDE) which helps Oracle SQL developers to increase PL/SQL coding speed, provides versatile data editing tools for managing in-database and external data.

dbForge Studio for PostgreSQL

dbForge Studio for PostgreSQL

It is a GUI tool for database development and management. The IDE for PostgreSQL allows users to create, develop, and execute queries, edit and adjust the code to their requirements in a convenient and user-friendly interface.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

dbForge Studio for SQL Server

dbForge Studio for SQL Server

It is a powerful IDE for SQL Server management, administration, development, data reporting and analysis. The tool will help SQL developers to manage databases, version-control database changes in popular source control systems, speed up routine tasks, as well, as to make complex database changes.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase