Datadog vs Zabbix

Overview

Datadog

Stacks9.8K

Followers8.2K

Votes861

Zabbix

Stacks684

Followers981

Votes66

GitHub Stars5.3K

Forks1.1K

Datadog vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare Datadog and Zabbix, two popular monitoring and observability tools. Both tools offer different features and capabilities that cater to specific needs and requirements of organizations. Understanding the key differences between Datadog and Zabbix can help users make an informed decision regarding which tool may be the better fit for their monitoring and observability needs.

Cloud-native Monitoring: Datadog is a cloud-native monitoring platform that is specifically designed to monitor cloud-based environments, such as Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP). It offers comprehensive support for cloud services, making it easier to monitor cloud-based workloads, services, and infrastructure. On the other hand, Zabbix is more focused on on-premises infrastructure monitoring and may require additional configuration or customization to monitor cloud environments.
Ease of Use and Scalability: Datadog provides a highly intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easier for users to navigate and configure the tool. It offers out-of-the-box integrations with a wide range of technologies, simplifying the monitoring setup process. Additionally, Datadog's scalable architecture allows users to easily scale their monitoring capabilities as their infrastructure grows. Zabbix, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve and requires more manual configuration and setup, making it suitable for more technical users or those with specific customization needs.
Monitoring Capabilities: Datadog offers a comprehensive set of monitoring capabilities, including infrastructure monitoring, application performance monitoring (APM), log management, and real-time analytics. It provides a wide range of integrations and supports monitoring across various technology stacks, making it suitable for monitoring complex, distributed systems. Zabbix focuses more on infrastructure monitoring and provides basic application monitoring capabilities. While it can be customized to monitor different technologies, it may require more effort and expertise compared to Datadog.
Alerting and Notification: Datadog offers robust alerting and notification features, allowing users to create and configure alerts based on various metrics and thresholds. It supports multiple notification channels, including email, SMS, and integrations with collaboration tools like Slack, PagerDuty, and Jira. Zabbix also offers alerting and notification capabilities but may require more manual configuration and setup compared to Datadog.
Community and Ecosystem: Datadog has a large and active community of users and developers, providing a wealth of resources, tutorials, and support for users. It also has a wide ecosystem of integrations and plugins developed by both Datadog and the community, allowing users to extend the tool's capabilities. Zabbix also has a community and ecosystem of users and developers but may have a smaller community compared to Datadog.
Pricing and Licensing: Datadog offers a flexible pricing model based on the number of hosts or infrastructure components monitored, allowing users to pay for the exact resources they need. It also offers a free tier with limited features for small-scale monitoring. Zabbix, on the other hand, is an open-source tool available under the GNU General Public License (GPL), making it free to use and modify. However, users may need to invest more in hardware resources and maintenance for larger-scale deployments.

In summary, Datadog is a cloud-native monitoring platform specifically designed for monitoring cloud-based environments, offering ease of use, scalability, a comprehensive set of monitoring capabilities, robust alerting, and a large community and ecosystem. On the other hand, Zabbix is more focused on on-premises infrastructure monitoring, requires more manual configuration, and provides basic application monitoring capabilities. It is available as an open-source tool with no licensing costs but may require more investment in hardware resources and maintenance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Datadog, Zabbix

Farzeem Diamond

Software Engineer at IVP

Jul 21, 2020

Needs adviceon

Datadog

Dynatrace

AppDynamics

Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.

Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS

Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure

Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server

Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.

Please advise on the above. Thanks!

1.59M views1.59M

Comments

Medeti

Jun 27, 2020

Needs adviceon

Amazon EKS

Kubernetes

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.

We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.

We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.

You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?

1.51M views1.51M

Comments

vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceon

Centreon

Zabbix

Datadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

795k views795k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Datadog	Zabbix
Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!	Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.
14-day Free Trial for an unlimited number of hosts;200+ turn-key integrations for data aggregation;Clean graphs of StatsD and other integrations;Slice and dice graphs and alerts by tags, roles, and more;Easy-to-use search for hosts, metrics, and tags;Alert notifications via e-mail and PagerDuty;Receive alerts on any metric, for a single host or an entire cluster;Full API access in more than 15 languages;Overlay metrics and events across disparate sources;Out-of-the-box and customizable monitoring dashboards;Easy way to compute rates, ratios, averages, or integrals;Sampling intervals of 10 seconds;Mute all alerts with 1 click during upgrades and maintenance;Tools for team collaboration	Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 5.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.1K
Stacks 9.8K	Stacks 684
Followers 8.2K	Followers 981
Votes 861	Votes 66
Pros & Cons
Pros 140 Monitoring for many apps (databases, web servers, etc) 107 Easy setup 87 Powerful ui 84 Powerful integrations 70 Great value Cons 20 Expensive 4 No errors exception tracking 2 External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging 1 Complicated	Pros 21 Free 9 Alerts 5 Templates 5 Service/node/network discovery 4 Base metrics from the box Cons 5 The UI is in PHP 2 Puppet module is sluggish
Integrations
NGINX Google App Engine Apache HTTP Server Java Docker Pingdom MySQL Ruby Python Memcached	Slack Jira PagerDuty Grafana Ansible Skype Chef Bugzilla HipChat ServiceNow.com

What are some alternatives to Datadog, Zabbix?

New Relic

The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

AppSignal

AppSignal gives you and your team alerts and detailed metrics about your Ruby, Node.js or Elixir application. Sensible pricing, no aggressive sales & support by developers.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

AppDynamics

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Related Comparisons

Datadog vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Introduction

Cloud-native Monitoring: Datadog is a cloud-native monitoring platform that is specifically designed to monitor cloud-based environments, such as Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP). It offers comprehensive support for cloud services, making it easier to monitor cloud-based workloads, services, and infrastructure. On the other hand, Zabbix is more focused on on-premises infrastructure monitoring and may require additional configuration or customization to monitor cloud environments.
Ease of Use and Scalability: Datadog provides a highly intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easier for users to navigate and configure the tool. It offers out-of-the-box integrations with a wide range of technologies, simplifying the monitoring setup process. Additionally, Datadog's scalable architecture allows users to easily scale their monitoring capabilities as their infrastructure grows. Zabbix, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve and requires more manual configuration and setup, making it suitable for more technical users or those with specific customization needs.
Monitoring Capabilities: Datadog offers a comprehensive set of monitoring capabilities, including infrastructure monitoring, application performance monitoring (APM), log management, and real-time analytics. It provides a wide range of integrations and supports monitoring across various technology stacks, making it suitable for monitoring complex, distributed systems. Zabbix focuses more on infrastructure monitoring and provides basic application monitoring capabilities. While it can be customized to monitor different technologies, it may require more effort and expertise compared to Datadog.
Alerting and Notification: Datadog offers robust alerting and notification features, allowing users to create and configure alerts based on various metrics and thresholds. It supports multiple notification channels, including email, SMS, and integrations with collaboration tools like Slack, PagerDuty, and Jira. Zabbix also offers alerting and notification capabilities but may require more manual configuration and setup compared to Datadog.
Community and Ecosystem: Datadog has a large and active community of users and developers, providing a wealth of resources, tutorials, and support for users. It also has a wide ecosystem of integrations and plugins developed by both Datadog and the community, allowing users to extend the tool's capabilities. Zabbix also has a community and ecosystem of users and developers but may have a smaller community compared to Datadog.
Pricing and Licensing: Datadog offers a flexible pricing model based on the number of hosts or infrastructure components monitored, allowing users to pay for the exact resources they need. It also offers a free tier with limited features for small-scale monitoring. Zabbix, on the other hand, is an open-source tool available under the GNU General Public License (GPL), making it free to use and modify. However, users may need to invest more in hardware resources and maintenance for larger-scale deployments.

Datadog vs Zabbix

Overview