StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Crucible vs RuboCop vs Snyk

Crucible vs RuboCop vs Snyk

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RuboCop
RuboCop
Stacks1.4K
Followers222
Votes41
Crucible
Crucible
Stacks55
Followers118
Votes12
Snyk
Snyk
Stacks580
Followers380
Votes20

Crucible vs RuboCop vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of software development, tools such as Crucible, RuboCop, and Snyk serve distinct purposes in ensuring code quality, security, and collaboration. Understanding the key differences between these tools is crucial for developers to make informed decisions on which tool best suits their needs.

  1. Integration with IDEs: Crucible is tightly integrated with IDEs such as IntelliJ IDEA, Eclipse, and Visual Studio, making it seamless for developers to review code within their familiar development environment. In contrast, RuboCop and Snyk are more command-line focused tools, requiring developers to run them separately from their IDE.

  2. Focus on Code Reviews: Crucible primarily focuses on code reviews, providing a platform for peer review, feedback, and discussions among developers. RuboCop, on the other hand, is a linter that enforces coding conventions and best practices in Ruby code. Snyk, meanwhile, specializes in identifying and fixing vulnerabilities in open-source dependencies.

  3. Programming Language Support: RuboCop is specifically designed for Ruby code analysis, ensuring consistency and maintainability in Ruby projects. Snyk, on the other hand, supports multiple programming languages, including JavaScript, Python, Java, and Ruby. Crucible is programming language agnostic, making it suitable for code reviews across various languages.

  4. Automated Security Testing: Snyk stands out for its automated security testing capabilities, scanning dependencies for known vulnerabilities and providing actionable insights to mitigate security risks. While Crucible and RuboCop focus more on code quality and review, Snyk prioritizes security in the development process.

  5. Customization and Configuration: RuboCop offers extensive customization options through configuration files, allowing developers to tailor the linter to their project's specific requirements. In comparison, Crucible provides a comprehensive set of features for code review workflows but may have limited configurability. Snyk offers both CLI and integrations with CI/CD pipelines for flexible security testing setups.

  6. Community Support and Updates: RuboCop benefits from a robust community of Ruby developers who contribute to its ongoing development and updates, ensuring compatibility with the latest Ruby language features. Snyk also receives regular updates and security vulnerability databases to stay ahead of emerging threats. Crucible, being a commercial product, offers dedicated support and feature enhancements according to the vendor's roadmap.

In Summary, understanding the differences in integration, focus, language support, testing capabilities, customization, and community support among Crucible, RuboCop, and Snyk is essential for developers to choose the right tool for their specific needs in code quality, security, and collaboration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

RuboCop
RuboCop
Crucible
Crucible
Snyk
Snyk

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

It is a Web-based application primarily aimed at enterprise, and certain features that enable peer review of a code base may be considered enterprise social software.

Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform

-
Workflow-based reviews;Quick reviews with cut-and-paste snippets;Create reviews from the command line;One-click reviews from changesets or issues;Threaded comments, inline discussions
-
Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
55
Stacks
580
Followers
222
Followers
118
Followers
380
Votes
41
Votes
12
Votes
20
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Open-source
  • 8
    Completely free
  • 7
    Runs Offline
  • 4
    Follows the Ruby Style Guide by default
  • 4
    Can automatically fix some problems
Pros
  • 5
    JIRA Integration
  • 4
    Post-commit preview
  • 2
    Has a linux version
  • 1
    Pre-commit preview
Pros
  • 10
    Github Integration
  • 5
    Free for open source projects
  • 4
    Finds lots of real vulnerabilities
  • 1
    Easy to deployed
Cons
  • 2
    Does not integrated with SonarQube
  • 1
    No malware detection
  • 1
    False positives
  • 1
    Complex UI
  • 1
    No surface monitoring
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
Trello
Trello
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Confluence
Confluence
Scala
Scala
.NET
.NET
GitHub
GitHub
CircleCI
CircleCI
Docker
Docker
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to RuboCop, Crucible, Snyk?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana