StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Courgette vs WebdriverIO

Courgette vs WebdriverIO

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

WebdriverIO
WebdriverIO
Stacks426
Followers509
Votes40
GitHub Stars9.7K
Forks2.6K
Courgette
Courgette
Stacks1
Followers8
Votes0
GitHub Stars67
Forks11

WebdriverIO vs Courgette: What are the differences?

WebdriverIO: Webdriver/Selenium 2.0 JavaScript bindings for Node.js. WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read; Courgette: A simple UI testing for all the team. Test your Web and Native Mobile Apps. It is a Selenium-based UI Testing Framework written in JS that’s built on top of Cucumber with Protractor for desktop / hybrid apps and Cucumber with WDIO and appium for native mobile apps.

WebdriverIO belongs to "Browser Testing" category of the tech stack, while Courgette can be primarily classified under "Javascript Testing Framework".

Some of the features offered by WebdriverIO are:

  • Extendable
  • Support for the WebDriver specification as well as to Appium
  • Easy Test Setup

On the other hand, Courgette provides the following key features:

  • Snippets or live templates for intellisense in your favourite IDE to write those steps accurately and quickly
  • Courgette API for creating your own step definitions
  • Screenshots on error for debugging

WebdriverIO is an open source tool with 5.63K GitHub stars and 1.64K GitHub forks. Here's a link to WebdriverIO's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on WebdriverIO, Courgette

Esther
Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceonreact-testing-libraryreact-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k
Comments
Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

WebdriverIO
WebdriverIO
Courgette
Courgette

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

It is a Selenium-based UI Testing Framework written in JS that’s built on top of Cucumber with Protractor for desktop / hybrid apps and Cucumber with WDIO and appium for native mobile apps.

Extendable; Support for the WebDriver specification as well as to Appium; Easy Test Setup; Run tests on desktop and mobile, Command line interface
Snippets or live templates for intellisense in your favourite IDE to write those steps accurately and quickly; Courgette API for creating your own step definitions; Screenshots on error for debugging; A step for named screenshots; Cucumber formatter for nice output in the terminal; Cucumber formatter for step definition usage; Error report summary in the terminal output; Ability to run against cloud services that provide a selenium grid; Ability to easily create true BDD user stories
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.7K
GitHub Stars
67
GitHub Forks
2.6K
GitHub Forks
11
Stacks
426
Stacks
1
Followers
509
Followers
8
Votes
40
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs
  • 10
    Open Source
  • 8
    Great community
  • 7
    Easy to setup
  • 4
    Best solution for broad browser support
Cons
  • 8
    High maintenance
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
Selenium
Selenium
WebStorm
WebStorm
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Atom
Atom
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
Linux
Linux
iOS
iOS
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS
TextMate
TextMate

What are some alternatives to WebdriverIO, Courgette?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana