Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Corezoid vs Postman: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Corezoid and Postman
Corezoid and Postman are both widely used tools in software development, but they serve different purposes. Here are the key differences between Corezoid and Postman:
Workflow Automation vs API Testing: Corezoid is a workflow automation tool that helps businesses automate their processes by creating and managing workflows. On the other hand, Postman is primarily an API testing and development tool that allows developers to test and debug APIs.
Collaboration and Integration: Corezoid provides a collaborative environment where teams can work together on building and managing workflows. It offers features like real-time collaboration, task management, and role-based permissions. Postman, on the other hand, focuses more on API testing and documentation, with limited collaboration features.
Low-Code vs Coding: Corezoid offers a low-code/no-code approach to workflow automation, allowing users to build complex workflows without writing traditional code. It provides a visual interface and drag-and-drop functionality, making it easier for non-technical users to create and modify workflows. In contrast, Postman requires users to write code in order to execute API requests and tests.
Deployment and Scalability: Corezoid is designed to handle large-scale workflows and supports high load and high availability scenarios. It ensures seamless horizontal scaling and provides robust deployment options. Postman, on the other hand, is mainly used for testing and debugging APIs, and it does not offer the same level of scalability and deployment options as Corezoid.
Integration with Third-Party Services: Corezoid provides pre-built integrations with a wide range of third-party services, such as CRMs, ERPs, and messaging platforms. It allows users to easily connect and interact with these services within their workflows. Postman, on the other hand, focuses more on API testing and does not provide as extensive integration options as Corezoid.
Pricing Model: Corezoid offers a subscription-based pricing model, where the cost is determined by the number of active users and the complexity of workflows. On the other hand, Postman offers both free and paid plans, with the paid plans providing additional features and capabilities.
In Summary, Corezoid is a powerful workflow automation tool that offers collaboration, low-code development, scalability, extensive integration options, and a subscription-based pricing model. On the other hand, Postman is primarily an API testing and development tool that focuses on API testing, debugging, and documentation.
From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"
I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).
I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.
I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.
Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.
Pros of Corezoid
Pros of Postman
- Easy to use490
- Great tool369
- Makes developing rest api's easy peasy276
- Easy setup, looks good156
- The best api workflow out there144
- It's the best53
- History feature53
- Adds real value to my workflow44
- Great interface that magically predicts your needs43
- The best in class app35
- Can save and share script12
- Fully featured without looking cluttered10
- Collections8
- Option to run scrips8
- Global/Environment Variables8
- Shareable Collections7
- Dead simple and useful. Excellent7
- Dark theme easy on the eyes7
- Awesome customer support6
- Great integration with newman6
- Documentation5
- Simple5
- The test script is useful5
- Saves responses4
- This has simplified my testing significantly4
- Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,34
- Easy as pie4
- API-network3
- I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis3
- Mocking API calls with predefined response3
- Now supports GraphQL2
- Postman Runner CI Integration2
- Easy to setup, test and provides test storage2
- Continuous integration using newman2
- Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable2
- Runner2
- Graph2
- <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Corezoid
Cons of Postman
- Stores credentials in HTTP10
- Bloated features and UI9
- Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens8
- Poor GraphQL support7
- Expensive5
- Not free after 5 users3
- Can't prompt for per-request variables3
- Import swagger1
- Support websocket1
- Import curl1