StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Service Discovery
  5. Consul vs Rancher

Consul vs Rancher

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Consul
Consul
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.5K
Votes213
GitHub Stars29.5K
Forks4.5K
Rancher
Rancher
Stacks952
Followers1.5K
Votes644

Consul vs Rancher: What are the differences?

Introduction

Consul and Rancher are both popular tools used in the management of containerized environments, but they have significant differences in terms of features and functionality.

  1. Service Discovery and Health Checking: Consul provides a service registry that allows applications to discover and connect to services. It also performs health checks to ensure the availability of services. On the other hand, Rancher integrates with external service registries like Consul for service discovery and health checking.

  2. Multi-Cloud and Multi-Region Support: Consul is designed to work across multiple clouds and regions, providing a flexible infrastructure for distributed systems. Rancher, on the other hand, focuses on managing containerized applications within a single cloud or data center.

  3. Security and Access Control: Consul offers features like ACLs (Access Control Lists) to secure service communication and limit access to resources. In contrast, Rancher provides RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) to manage user access and permissions within the Rancher platform.

  4. Load Balancing and Traffic Management: Consul includes built-in support for load balancing and traffic management, allowing it to route requests to healthy services. Rancher, however, relies on external load balancers and ingress controllers for these capabilities.

  5. Container Orchestration: Rancher incorporates container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes and Docker Swarm, providing a comprehensive solution for managing containerized applications. Consul, on the other hand, does not directly offer container orchestration and focuses more on service discovery and connectivity.

  6. Monitoring and Logging: Rancher includes built-in monitoring and logging capabilities, allowing users to collect and analyze metrics and logs from their containerized environments. Consul does not provide these features natively, but it can be integrated with third-party monitoring and logging tools.

In summary, Consul is a service discovery and networking tool with multi-cloud and multi-region support, whereas Rancher is a comprehensive container management platform that includes features like container orchestration, security, and monitoring.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Consul
Consul
Rancher
Rancher

Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Service Discovery - Consul makes it simple for services to register themselves and to discover other services via a DNS or HTTP interface. External services such as SaaS providers can be registered as well.;Health Checking - Health Checking enables Consul to quickly alert operators about any issues in a cluster. The integration with service discovery prevents routing traffic to unhealthy hosts and enables service level circuit breakers.;Key/Value Storage - A flexible key/value store enables storing dynamic configuration, feature flagging, coordination, leader election and more. The simple HTTP API makes it easy to use anywhere.;Multi-Datacenter - Consul is built to be datacenter aware, and can support any number of regions without complex configuration.
Manage Hosts, Deploy Containers, Monitor Resources;User Management & Collaboration;Native Docker APIs & Tools;Monitoring and Logging;Connect Containers, Manage Disks, Deploy Load Balancers;Docker App Catalog; Included Kubernetes Distribution;Included Docker Swarm Distribution; Included Mesos Distribution;Infrastructure Management
Statistics
GitHub Stars
29.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
952
Followers
1.5K
Followers
1.5K
Votes
213
Votes
644
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 61
    Great service discovery infrastructure
  • 35
    Health checking
  • 29
    Distributed key-value store
  • 26
    Monitoring
  • 23
    High-availability
Pros
  • 103
    Easy to use
  • 79
    Open source and totally free
  • 63
    Multi-host docker-compose support
  • 58
    Simple
  • 58
    Load balancing and health check included
Cons
  • 10
    Hosting Rancher can be complicated
Integrations
No integrations available
Jenkins
Jenkins
Datadog
Datadog
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Drone.io
Drone.io

What are some alternatives to Consul, Rancher?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Eureka

Eureka

Eureka is a REST (Representational State Transfer) based service that is primarily used in the AWS cloud for locating services for the purpose of load balancing and failover of middle-tier servers.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Zookeeper

Zookeeper

A centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. All of these kinds of services are used in some form or another by distributed applications.

etcd

etcd

etcd is a distributed key value store that provides a reliable way to store data across a cluster of machines. It’s open-source and available on GitHub. etcd gracefully handles master elections during network partitions and will tolerate machine failure, including the master.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana