Conductor vs Istio

Overview

Conductor

Stacks66

Followers122

Votes0

GitHub Stars12.8K

Forks2.3K

Istio

Stacks2.3K

Followers1.5K

Votes54

GitHub Stars37.6K

Forks8.1K

Conductor vs Istio: What are the differences?

Networking: Conductor focuses on network automation and orchestration, enabling users to manage and scale their network infrastructure efficiently. In contrast, Istio is a service mesh that helps with managing and securing microservices communication within a distributed system.
Traffic Management: Conductor provides advanced traffic management capabilities, such as load balancing, traffic shaping, and failover, to optimize network performance. On the other hand, Istio offers traffic routing, retries, and circuit breaking functionalities for microservices communication.
Security: Conductor offers security features like access control policies, encryption, and compliance management for network security. In comparison, Istio provides mTLS (mutual Transport Layer Security), RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), and secure communication between microservices to enhance security within a distributed system.
Monitoring: Conductor includes monitoring and logging tools to track network performance and troubleshoot issues effectively. In contrast, Istio offers telemetry features such as metrics collection, distributed tracing, and logging for monitoring microservices communication and performance.
Policy Enforcement: Conductor allows users to define and enforce network policies to control traffic routing, access privileges, and security measures. Meanwhile, Istio enables policy enforcement through features like rate limiting, request authentication, and authorization policies to regulate microservices communication within a service mesh.
Environment Compatibility: Conductor is suitable for managing traditional network infrastructure, including physical and virtual devices, while Istio is designed specifically for cloud-native environments and containerized applications running on Kubernetes.

In Summary, Conductor primarily focuses on network automation and orchestration for traditional infrastructure, while Istio specializes in managing and securing microservices communication within cloud-native environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Conductor, Istio

Prateek

Mar 14, 2020

Decided

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

322k views322k

Comments

lyc218

Feb 21, 2020

Needs advice

Envoy proxy is widely adopted in many companies for service mesh proxy, but it utilizes BoringSSL by default. Red Hat OpenShift fork envoy branch with their own OpenSSL support, I wonder any other companies are also using envoy-openssl branch for compatibility? How about AWS App Mesh?

Any input would be much appreciated!

42.8k views42.8k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Conductor	Istio
Conductor is an orchestration engine that runs in the cloud.	Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.
Allow creating complex process / business flows in which individual task is implemented by a microservice.;A JSON DSL based blueprint defines the execution flow.;Provide visibility and traceability into the these process flows.;Expose control semantics around pause, resume, restart, etc allowing for better devops experience.;Allow greater reuse of existing microservices providing an easier path for onboarding.;User interface to visualize the process flows.;Ability to synchronously process all the tasks when needed.;Ability to scale millions of concurrently running process flows.;Backed by a queuing service abstracted from the clients.;Be able to operate on HTTP or other transports e.g. gRPC.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 12.8K	GitHub Stars 37.6K
GitHub Forks 2.3K	GitHub Forks 8.1K
Stacks 66	Stacks 2.3K
Followers 122	Followers 1.5K
Votes 0	Votes 54
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 14 Zero code for logging and monitoring 9 Service Mesh 8 Great flexibility 5 Powerful authorization mechanisms 5 Ingress controller Cons 17 Performance
Integrations
No integrations available	Kubernetes Docker

What are some alternatives to Conductor, Istio?

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Express Gateway

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

linkerd

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

Jersey

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Ocelot

It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.

Micro

Micro is a framework for cloud native development. Micro addresses the key requirements for building cloud native services. It leverages the microservices architecture pattern and provides a set of services which act as the building blocks

Related Comparisons

Conductor vs Istio: What are the differences?

Networking: Conductor focuses on network automation and orchestration, enabling users to manage and scale their network infrastructure efficiently. In contrast, Istio is a service mesh that helps with managing and securing microservices communication within a distributed system.
Traffic Management: Conductor provides advanced traffic management capabilities, such as load balancing, traffic shaping, and failover, to optimize network performance. On the other hand, Istio offers traffic routing, retries, and circuit breaking functionalities for microservices communication.
Security: Conductor offers security features like access control policies, encryption, and compliance management for network security. In comparison, Istio provides mTLS (mutual Transport Layer Security), RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), and secure communication between microservices to enhance security within a distributed system.
Monitoring: Conductor includes monitoring and logging tools to track network performance and troubleshoot issues effectively. In contrast, Istio offers telemetry features such as metrics collection, distributed tracing, and logging for monitoring microservices communication and performance.
Policy Enforcement: Conductor allows users to define and enforce network policies to control traffic routing, access privileges, and security measures. Meanwhile, Istio enables policy enforcement through features like rate limiting, request authentication, and authorization policies to regulate microservices communication within a service mesh.
Environment Compatibility: Conductor is suitable for managing traditional network infrastructure, including physical and virtual devices, while Istio is designed specifically for cloud-native environments and containerized applications running on Kubernetes.

Conductor vs Istio

Overview