Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Concourse

259
390
+ 1
54
Jenkins X

149
369
+ 1
16
Add tool

Concourse vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

Introduction

Concourse and Jenkins X are both popular continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) tools used to automate the software development and deployment process. However, there are key differences between them that make each tool unique and suited for different use cases.

  1. Architecture: Concourse is designed around the concept of resources and tasks, where resources are inputs or outputs of a task. It follows a declarative approach, where pipeline configuration is defined in a YAML file. On the other hand, Jenkins X is built on top of Jenkins and Kubernetes. It utilizes GitOps principles, where all the configuration is stored in version control, and Jenkins X automatically deploys and manages the Jenkins infrastructure on Kubernetes.

  2. Scalability and Extensibility: Concourse is designed to be highly scalable and can handle large pipelines and complex workflows. It allows you to easily define and manage resources, making it suitable for large enterprises. Jenkins X, on the other hand, leverages the scalability and extensibility of Kubernetes. It provides automatic scaling of build agents and can seamlessly integrate with third-party plugins from the Jenkins ecosystem.

  3. Native Kubernetes Support: Jenkins X is specifically built for the Kubernetes ecosystem. It leverages Kubernetes pods and containers for running builds and deployments, providing native support for cloud-native applications. Concourse also has support for Kubernetes, but it treats Kubernetes as just another resource and does not have the same level of integration and automation as Jenkins X.

  4. GitOps Workflow: Jenkins X follows a GitOps workflow, where all the configuration and changes are managed through Git repositories. This allows for easy collaboration, versioning, and rollback of changes. Concourse also supports version control systems, but it does not enforce the GitOps workflow as strictly as Jenkins X.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Jenkins X has a large and active community, with a wide range of plugins and extensions available from the Jenkins ecosystem. This makes it easier to integrate with other tools and services commonly used in the DevOps landscape. Concourse also has a community and ecosystem, but it may not have the same breadth and depth as Jenkins X.

  6. User Interface and User Experience: Concourse has a clean and intuitive web interface for monitoring and managing pipelines. It provides detailed logs and visualizations for better visibility into the pipeline execution. Jenkins X also has a web interface, but it is built on top of Jenkins and follows a more traditional Jenkins UI, which may be more familiar to users already familiar with Jenkins.

In Summary, Concourse and Jenkins X have different architectural approaches, with Concourse focusing on declarative pipelines and resources, while Jenkins X leverages Kubernetes and follows a GitOps workflow.

Advice on Concourse and Jenkins X
Needs advice
on
ConcourseConcourse
and
JenkinsJenkins

I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !

See more
Replies (1)
Maxi Krone
Cloud Engineer at fme AG · | 2 upvotes · 395.1K views
Recommends
on
ConcourseConcourse

I would definetly recommend Concourse to you, as it is one of the most advanced modern methods of making CI/CD while Jenkins is an old monolithic dinosaur. Concourse itself is cloudnative and containerbased which helps you to build simple, high-performance and scalable CI/CD pipelines. In my opinion, the only lack of skills you have with Concourse is your own knowledge of how to build pipelines and automate things. Technincally there is no lack, i would even say you can extend it way more easily. But as a Con it is more easy to interact with Jenkins if you are only used to UIs. Concourse needs someone which is capable of using CLIs.

See more
Needs advice
on
CircleCICircleCIGitLab CIGitLab CI
and
Jenkins XJenkins X

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

  • Fast SBT builds (caching)
  • Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
  • Everything as code
  • Ease of use
See more
Replies (3)
Glenn Gillen
Recommends
on
BuildkiteBuildkite

I think I've tried most of the CI tools out there at some point. It took me a while to get around to Buildkite because at first I didn't see much point given it seemed like you had to run the agent yourself. Eventually it dawned on me why this approach was more ingenious than I realised:

Running my app in a production (or production-like) environment was already a solved problem, because everything was already in some form of "everything as code". Having a test environment where the only difference was adding the Buildkite agent was a trivial addition.

It means that dev/test/prod parity is simple to achieve and maintain. It's also proven to be much easier to support than trying to deal with the problems that come with trying to force an app to fit into the nuances and constraints that are imposed by the containers/runtime of a CI service. When you completely control all of the environment the tests are running in you define those constraints too. It's been a great balance between a managed service and the flexibility of running it yourself.

And while none of my needs have hit the scale of Shopify (I saw one of their engineers speak about it at a conference once, I can't find the video now though 😞) it's good to know I can scale out my worker nodes to hundreds of thousands of workers to reduce the time it takes for my tests to run.

See more
Recommends
on
jFrogjFrog

I would recommend you to consider the JFrog Platform that includes JFrog Pipelines - it will allow you to manage the full artifact life cycle for your sbt, docker and other technologies, and automate all of your CI and CD using cloud native declarative yaml pipelines. Will integrate smoothly with all your other toolset.

See more
Estu Fardani
Recommends
on
GitLab CIGitLab CI

more configurable to setup ci/cd: * It can provide caching when build sbt, just add this section to yml file * Easy to use, many documentation

Weakness: * Need use gitlab as repository to bring more powerful configuration

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Concourse
Pros of Jenkins X
  • 16
    Real pipelines
  • 10
    Containerised builds
  • 9
    Flexible engine
  • 6
    Fast
  • 4
    Open source
  • 3
    No Snowflakes
  • 3
    Simple configuration management
  • 2
    You have to do everything
  • 1
    Fancy Visualization
  • 7
    Kubernetes integration
  • 5
    Scripted Pipelines
  • 4
    GitOps

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Concourse
Cons of Jenkins X
  • 2
    Fail forward instead of rollback pattern
  • 1
    Complexity

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Concourse?

Concourse's principles reduce the risk of switching to and from Concourse, by encouraging practices that decouple your project from your CI's little details, and keeping all configuration in declarative files that can be checked into version control.

What is Jenkins X?

Jenkins X is a CI/CD solution for modern cloud applications on Kubernetes

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention Concourse and Jenkins X as a desired skillset
What companies use Concourse?
What companies use Jenkins X?
See which teams inside your own company are using Concourse or Jenkins X.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Concourse?
What tools integrate with Jenkins X?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Concourse and Jenkins X?
Jenkins
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
CircleCI
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
Spinnaker
Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.
TeamCity
TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.
GitLab CI
GitLab offers a continuous integration service. If you add a .gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline.
See all alternatives