StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Document Databases
  4. Mongodb Hosting
  5. Compose vs Composer

Compose vs Composer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Compose
Compose
Stacks258
Followers121
Votes206
Composer
Composer
Stacks1.2K
Followers559
Votes13
GitHub Stars29.2K
Forks4.7K

Compose vs Composer: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of software development, it is crucial to have a clear understanding of the differences between tools and frameworks. Two commonly used tools in the context of web development are Compose and Composer. While both serve similar purposes, they differ significantly in their functionality and target audiences.

1. Installation Process:

  • Compose: Compose is a tool specifically designed for Docker, a platform used to containerize applications. It is used to define, deploy, and manage multi-container Docker applications. It requires Docker to be installed.
  • Composer: Composer, on the other hand, is a dependency management tool for PHP programming language. It allows developers to easily manage third-party libraries and packages for their PHP projects. It is installed globally via the command line.

2. Functionality and Usage:

  • Compose: Compose focuses on automating the deployment and management of multi-container Docker applications. It uses YAML files to define the services, networks, and volumes required for the application to run, simplifying the deployment process.
  • Composer: Composer focuses on managing PHP dependencies. It uses a JSON file (composer.json) to define the required packages and their versions. It fetches and installs these packages from the central repository (Packagist) and integrates them into the project.

3. Target Audience:

  • Compose: Compose is primarily targeted towards DevOps engineers and system administrators who work with Docker and need an efficient way to manage and deploy containerized applications.
  • Composer: Composer is targeted towards PHP developers who need a tool to manage their project dependencies and simplify the process of integrating third-party libraries and packages into their projects.

4. Language and Technology:

  • Compose: Compose is language-agnostic and can be used with any programming language as long as the application is containerized using Docker.
  • Composer: Composer is specifically designed for PHP projects and manages PHP libraries and packages.

5. Dependency Resolution:

  • Compose: Compose does not handle package dependency resolution as it primarily focuses on managing the deployment of containerized applications rather than specific libraries or packages.
  • Composer: Composer excels in dependency resolution, ensuring that the required versions of libraries and packages are fetched, installed, and integrated into the PHP project correctly.

6. Integration with IDE:

  • Compose: Compose does not provide direct integration with specific IDEs. However, it is generally used through the command line or integrated as part of continuous deployment pipelines.
  • Composer: Composer has excellent integration with popular IDEs like PhpStorm, allowing developers to manage their project dependencies efficiently within the IDE.

In summary, Compose is a tool for managing Docker containers and automating their deployment, primarily targeted towards DevOps engineers. On the other hand, Composer is a dependency management tool for PHP projects, primarily targeted towards PHP developers, providing excellent package dependency resolution and integration with IDEs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Compose
Compose
Composer
Composer

Compose makes it easy to spin up multiple open source databases with just one click. Deploy MongoDB for production, take Redis out for a performance test drive, or spin up RethinkDB in development before rolling it out to production.

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

One click, production-ready, cloud hosted MongoDB, Redis, Elasticsearch, PostgreSQL and RethinkDB, with additional databases in beta. Every deployment features: database autoscaling based on data size usage; private VLAN, IP whitelisting, SSL, full-stack monitoring, custom alerts; HA and fault tolerance with automatic failover; enterprise-grade SSD; easy to add plugins including New Relic; daily, weekly and monthly backups at no additional cost; availability on multiple data centers; a global support team to troubleshoot problems quickly; dedicated servers available.
Locally; Globally
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
29.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.7K
Stacks
258
Stacks
1.2K
Followers
121
Followers
559
Votes
206
Votes
13
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 42
    Simple to set up
  • 32
    One-click mongodb
  • 29
    Automated Backups
  • 23
    Designed to scale
  • 21
    Easy interface
Pros
  • 7
    Must have dependency manager for PHP
  • 3
    Large number of libraries
  • 3
    Centralized autoload.php
Integrations
SoftLayer
SoftLayer
Heroku
Heroku
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
PhpStorm
PhpStorm
Linux
Linux
JavaScript
JavaScript
PHP
PHP
PuPHPet
PuPHPet
MySQL
MySQL
ReactPHP
ReactPHP
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Compose, Composer?

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

MongoLab

MongoLab

mLab is the largest cloud MongoDB service in the world, hosting over a half million deployments on AWS, Azure, and Google.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

MongoDB Atlas

MongoDB Atlas

MongoDB Atlas is a global cloud database service built and run by the team behind MongoDB. Enjoy the flexibility and scalability of a document database, with the ease and automation of a fully managed service on your preferred cloud.

PureScript

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

ObjectRocket

ObjectRocket

Fast, scalable, and reliably-managed Mongo DB, Redis, Elasticsearch, PostgreSQL, CockroachDB and TimescaleDB. An easy to use DBaaS (database as a service) platform on private or public cloud. Complete DB Management & Administration.

pnpm

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot