StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Server Configuration And Automation
  5. CodeStream vs Terraform

CodeStream vs Terraform

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Terraform
Terraform
Stacks22.9K
Followers14.7K
Votes344
GitHub Stars47.0K
Forks10.1K
CodeStream
CodeStream
Stacks26
Followers33
Votes3

CodeStream vs Terraform: What are the differences?

  1. Key difference 1: Integration with development tools: CodeStream is a code collaboration and knowledge-sharing platform that integrates with popular code editors like Visual Studio Code, Atom, and JetBrains IDEs. It provides seamless integrations and in-editor experiences for code reviews, comments, and discussions. On the other hand, Terraform is an open-source infrastructure as code software tool that allows users to define and provision infrastructure resources using declarative configuration files. It integrates with various cloud providers and deployment tools, enabling infrastructure orchestration and automation.
  2. Key difference 2: Scope of usage: CodeStream is primarily focused on enhancing the coding experience by providing tools for code review, knowledge sharing, and collaboration within an integrated development environment (IDE). It enables developers to discuss code in-line, capture feedback, and share code snippets more efficiently. In contrast, Terraform is specifically designed for managing infrastructure as code, allowing users to define, provision, and maintain cloud infrastructure resources such as virtual machines, networks, storage, and services.
  3. Key difference 3: Programming languages supported: CodeStream supports a wide range of programming languages since its main purpose is to facilitate code collaboration and discussion within an IDE. It provides language-specific features like code reviewing and commenting for various languages like JavaScript, Python, Java, C++, and more. On the contrary, Terraform is language-agnostic and can be used to provision infrastructure resources on any supported cloud provider, irrespective of the programming language used to develop the application.
  4. Key difference 4: Level of abstraction: CodeStream operates at a higher level of abstraction, focusing on the code review and collaboration aspects of software development. It provides real-time collaboration features, like code commenting and discussions, directly within the IDE. In contrast, Terraform operates at a lower level of abstraction, allowing users to define infrastructure resources and their configurations using declarative syntax, which is then translated into the specific cloud provider's API calls.
  5. Key difference 5: Complexity: CodeStream is designed to simplify the code review and collaboration process by providing a user-friendly interface and integrated functionalities within the IDE. It aims to reduce the complexity of coordinating and managing feedback and discussions related to code changes. Conversely, Terraform can involve more complexity due to the need to define and manage infrastructure resources, dependencies, and their configurations using Terraform-specific language constructs and modules.
  6. Key difference 6: Target audience: CodeStream is primarily targeted towards software development teams and organizations that prioritize collaboration, knowledge sharing, and code review processes as part of their development workflow. It is especially useful for teams working on complex projects or distributed teams that require effective code discussion and collaboration. In contrast, Terraform caters to infrastructure engineers, DevOps teams, and cloud architects who are responsible for managing and provisioning infrastructure resources, automating deployment processes, and maintaining infrastructure-as-code practices.

In summary, CodeStream focuses on enhancing code collaboration and knowledge sharing within an IDE, while Terraform is geared towards infrastructure management and provisioning using declarative configuration files, catering to different needs and target audiences in software development and infrastructure domains.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Terraform, CodeStream

Sung Won
Sung Won

Nov 4, 2019

DecidedonGoogle Cloud IoT CoreGoogle Cloud IoT CoreTerraformTerraformPythonPython

Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

Check out the GitHub repo attached

2.25M views2.25M
Comments
Timothy
Timothy

SRE

Mar 20, 2020

Decided

I personally am not a huge fan of vendor lock in for multiple reasons:

  • I've seen cost saving moves to the cloud end up costing a fortune and trapping companies due to over utilization of cloud specific features.
  • I've seen S3 failures nearly take down half the internet.
  • I've seen companies get stuck in the cloud because they aren't built cloud agnostic.

I choose to use terraform for my cloud provisioning for these reasons:

  • It's cloud agnostic so I can use it no matter where I am.
  • It isn't difficult to use and uses a relatively easy to read language.
  • It tests infrastructure before running it, and enables me to see and keep changes up to date.
  • It runs from the same CLI I do most of my CM work from.
385k views385k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

May 4, 2020

Decided

Because Pulumi uses real programming languages, you can actually write abstractions for your infrastructure code, which is incredibly empowering. You still 'describe' your desired state, but by having a programming language at your fingers, you can factor out patterns, and package it up for easier consumption.

426k views426k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Terraform
Terraform
CodeStream
CodeStream

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE. CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on your team, anywhere.

Infrastructure as Code: Infrastructure is described using a high-level configuration syntax. This allows a blueprint of your datacenter to be versioned and treated as you would any other code. Additionally, infrastructure can be shared and re-used.;Execution Plans: Terraform has a "planning" step where it generates an execution plan. The execution plan shows what Terraform will do when you call apply. This lets you avoid any surprises when Terraform manipulates infrastructure.;Resource Graph: Terraform builds a graph of all your resources, and parallelizes the creation and modification of any non-dependent resources. Because of this, Terraform builds infrastructure as efficiently as possible, and operators get insight into dependencies in their infrastructure.;Change Automation: Complex changesets can be applied to your infrastructure with minimal human interaction. With the previously mentioned execution plan and resource graph, you know exactly what Terraform will change and in what order, avoiding many possible human errors
Multiple IDE support; Works across branches; Reviews and discussions saved alongside your codebase; Automatic at-mentions; One-click navigation; Streamline code reviews; Merge conflict prediction; Automatic assigning code reviewer; Single Sign On
Statistics
GitHub Stars
47.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
10.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
22.9K
Stacks
26
Followers
14.7K
Followers
33
Votes
344
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 121
    Infrastructure as code
  • 73
    Declarative syntax
  • 45
    Planning
  • 28
    Simple
  • 24
    Parallelism
Cons
  • 1
    Doesn't have full support to GKE
Pros
  • 3
    Integrates with everything
Integrations
Heroku
Heroku
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
DNSimple
DNSimple
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Consul
Consul
Equinix Metal
Equinix Metal
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
OpenStack
OpenStack
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Slack
Slack
Asana
Asana
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Jira
Jira
GitHub
GitHub
Trello
Trello
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
GitLab
GitLab
Visual Studio Live Share
Visual Studio Live Share

What are some alternatives to Terraform, CodeStream?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Fabric

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

cPanel

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Webmin

Webmin

It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana