Codeship vs GitLab

Overview

Codeship

Stacks1.0K

Followers730

Votes1.5K

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Codeship vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Hosting environment: Codeship is a hosted continuous integration and delivery platform, while GitLab offers both self-hosted and hosted options. This means that with Codeship, users do not have to worry about maintaining the infrastructure, whereas GitLab gives users the flexibility to choose how and where their code is hosted.
Collaboration features: GitLab provides a complete DevOps platform with features such as issue tracking, code review, and CI/CD pipelines, all integrated into one tool. On the other hand, Codeship focuses primarily on CI/CD pipelines, with limited collaboration features compared to GitLab.
Pricing model: Codeship follows a usage-based pricing model, charging users based on the number of builds and parallel pipelines required. In contrast, GitLab offers a free core version for self-hosted use, as well as tiered pricing for additional features in its hosted version.
Integration capabilities: GitLab has a wide range of integrations with third-party tools and services, allowing users to customize their workflows according to their specific requirements. Codeship also offers integrations but may have a more limited selection compared to GitLab.
Version control system: GitLab is built on top of Git, which is a distributed version control system, giving users more flexibility and control over their code repositories. Codeship also supports Git repositories but does not offer the same level of version control system as GitLab.
Community support: GitLab has a large and active community, providing users with resources, forums, and knowledge bases to help troubleshoot issues and find solutions. Codeship, while it does have a support team, may not have the same level of community engagement and resources as GitLab.

In Summary, Codeship and GitLab differ in hosting environment, collaboration features, pricing model, integration capabilities, version control system, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Codeship, GitLab

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Codeship	GitLab
Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.	GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
Run you automated tests \| Easily set up Codeship with Github or Bitbucket and trigger your automated tests with a simple push to your repository.; 100 builds & 5 private projects free per month.;Free for OSS.;Configure deployment pipelines \| Set up powerful deployment pipelines that let you deploy with ease and confidence multiple times a day.;Notifications \| Intelligent notifications and integrations keep your team up-to-date.;SSH debug access \| Easily ssh into a debug build to get more insights.;Use your resources to build amazing products. Codeship takes care of managing and scaling your test and delivery infrastructure.	Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 0
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 1.0K	Stacks 63.4K
Followers 730	Followers 54.5K
Votes 1.5K	Votes 2.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros 215 Simple deployments 179 Easy setup 159 Github integration 147 Continuous deployment 110 Bitbucket integration Cons 3 Ui could use some polishing 0 Difficult to answer build questions 0 Antiquated ui	Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature
Integrations
Slack GitLab CI GitHub HipChat Google Compute Engine Ninefold Amazon EC2 Google App Engine AWS CodeDeploy Bitbucket	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Codeship, GitLab?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Related Comparisons

Codeship vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Hosting environment: Codeship is a hosted continuous integration and delivery platform, while GitLab offers both self-hosted and hosted options. This means that with Codeship, users do not have to worry about maintaining the infrastructure, whereas GitLab gives users the flexibility to choose how and where their code is hosted.
Collaboration features: GitLab provides a complete DevOps platform with features such as issue tracking, code review, and CI/CD pipelines, all integrated into one tool. On the other hand, Codeship focuses primarily on CI/CD pipelines, with limited collaboration features compared to GitLab.
Pricing model: Codeship follows a usage-based pricing model, charging users based on the number of builds and parallel pipelines required. In contrast, GitLab offers a free core version for self-hosted use, as well as tiered pricing for additional features in its hosted version.
Integration capabilities: GitLab has a wide range of integrations with third-party tools and services, allowing users to customize their workflows according to their specific requirements. Codeship also offers integrations but may have a more limited selection compared to GitLab.
Version control system: GitLab is built on top of Git, which is a distributed version control system, giving users more flexibility and control over their code repositories. Codeship also supports Git repositories but does not offer the same level of version control system as GitLab.
Community support: GitLab has a large and active community, providing users with resources, forums, and knowledge bases to help troubleshoot issues and find solutions. Codeship, while it does have a support team, may not have the same level of community engagement and resources as GitLab.

In Summary, Codeship and GitLab differ in hosting environment, collaboration features, pricing model, integration capabilities, version control system, and community support.

Codeship vs GitLab

Overview