StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Codefresh vs Jenkins

Codefresh vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Codefresh
Codefresh
Stacks64
Followers111
Votes47

Codefresh vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Codefresh and Jenkins

1. Intuitive User Interface: Codefresh offers a more intuitive and user-friendly interface compared to Jenkins. With its modern design and clear navigation, Codefresh provides an easier learning curve for new users. In contrast, Jenkins has a more complex and cluttered interface that may require additional time and effort to master.

2. Out-of-the-box Pipelines: Codefresh comes with built-in pipelines that allow users to quickly and easily set up CI/CD workflows without the need for extensive configuration. These pre-configured pipelines offer a streamlined process for building, testing, and deploying applications. Jenkins, on the other hand, requires manual configuration and scripting of pipelines, making it more time-consuming and complex to set up a workflow.

3. Native Kubernetes Integration: Codefresh has native integration with Kubernetes, a popular container orchestration platform. This integration allows for seamless deployment of applications to Kubernetes clusters, including automating versioning, scaling, and rolling updates. Jenkins, although it supports Kubernetes through plugins, does not have the same level of native integration and may require additional configuration and customization.

4. Integrated Docker Registry: Codefresh provides an integrated Docker registry that allows users to easily store, manage, and deploy their Docker images. This saves time and effort by eliminating the need for separate tools or services to handle the image repository. In contrast, Jenkins requires additional setup and configuration to integrate and manage a Docker registry.

5. Automatic Infrastructure Provisioning: Codefresh offers automatic infrastructure provisioning, allowing users to easily provision and manage the necessary infrastructure resources for their CI/CD pipelines. This includes provisioning virtual machines, containers, and other resources required for the build, test, and deployment processes. Jenkins does not have built-in support for automatic infrastructure provisioning and may require additional configuration and setup.

6. Built-in Security Scanning: Codefresh includes built-in security scanning capabilities that enable users to automatically scan their code and container images for vulnerabilities. This helps ensure that the application being built and deployed is secure and free from known vulnerabilities. Jenkins, although it can be integrated with external security scanning tools, does not have the same level of built-in scanning capabilities.

In Summary, Codefresh offers an intuitive user interface, out-of-the-box pipelines, native Kubernetes integration, an integrated Docker registry, automatic infrastructure provisioning, and built-in security scanning, making it a more user-friendly and efficient choice compared to Jenkins.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Codefresh

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Codefresh
Codefresh

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Instant Dev, test and feature preview environments: Enables all team members to run any image as a standalone or composition for feature preview, manual testing, bug reproduction and more. Collaborate on features before pushing them into staging and production.; Testing with every step: Configure your pipeline to run integration and unit tests with every step; Instantly test all code changes in the Codefresh build system before pushing to staging & production. Run integration, unit tests in parallel.; 360° view of Docker images: View commit info, test results and build logs for all images; Manage Docker image labels and status, comment and see new feature branches; search and filter based on any attribute.; Out-of-the-box Docker buildpack for all technologies: Seamlessly package your code in a Docker image. Quickly associate a Dockerfile with your repo by selecting the repository technology stack (Java, Node, PHP, etc.). Codefresh then adds a template for Dockerizing apps.; View and Access Running Container Logs: Access each container log directly from within the Codefresh platform. This lets you easily perform root-cause analysis on failed services and allows you to see logs in high debug model level.; Support for Docker Compose 1 & 2: Manage your Docker Compose file natively in one place, with support for both Docker Compose versions 1 and 2. Use a built-in wizard to write Docker Compose files quickly.; YAML file support: Customize and easily define your pipeline steps using a codefresh.yml file.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
64
Followers
50.4K
Followers
111
Votes
2.2K
Votes
47
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
  • 7
    Lack of support
Pros
  • 11
    Fastest and easiest way to work with Docker
  • 7
    Great support/fast builds/awesome ui
  • 6
    Great onboarding
  • 5
    Freestyle build steps to support custom CI/CD scripting
  • 4
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 1
    Questionable product quality and stability
  • 1
    Expensive compared to alternatives
Integrations
No integrations available
Quay.io
Quay.io
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
BinTray
BinTray
Docker Cloud
Docker Cloud
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat
BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Codefresh?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana