Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
coala vs SonarQube: What are the differences?
coala: Linting and fixing code for all languages. coala is a language independent analysis toolkit. It empowers developers to create rules which a project's code should conform to. coala takes care of showing these issues to users in a friendly manner, is versatile and can be used in any environment; SonarQube: Continuous Code Quality. SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
coala and SonarQube can be primarily classified as "Code Review" tools.
coala and SonarQube are both open source tools. SonarQube with 3.78K GitHub stars and 1.06K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than coala with 2.82K GitHub stars and 1.33K GitHub forks.
Pros of coala
- Can be run locally with Docker0
- Can fix problems automatically0
- Supports many languages0
Pros of SonarQube
- Tracks code complexity and smell trends26
- IDE Integration16
- Complete code Review9
- Difficult to deploy2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of coala
Cons of SonarQube
- Sales process is long and unfriendly7
- Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful7
- Does not integrate with Snyk1