StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. Cloudinary vs Firebase

Cloudinary vs Firebase

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Firebase
Firebase
Stacks42.5K
Followers36.0K
Votes2.0K
Cloudinary
Cloudinary
Stacks634
Followers594
Votes179

Cloudinary vs Firebase: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Cloudinary and Firebase, two popular platforms for managing and hosting data and media files.

  1. Infrastructure: Cloudinary is primarily an image and video management platform that provides extensive capabilities for optimizing, manipulating, and delivering media files. It offers a cloud-based infrastructure specifically designed to handle media-related tasks efficiently. On the other hand, Firebase is a comprehensive development platform that includes various products and services for building web and mobile applications, including real-time database, hosting, authentication, and cloud functions.

  2. Focus on Media Management: Cloudinary focuses primarily on handling media assets, providing advanced features like automatic image optimization, responsive delivery, and video transcoding. It offers a wide range of capabilities for transforming and manipulating media files according to specific requirements. In contrast, while Firebase does support media storage and hosting, it does not provide the same level of specialized features and optimizations as Cloudinary. Its main focus is on providing backend infrastructure and services for application development.

  3. Real-time Database: Firebase offers a real-time database, which is a NoSQL database that allows for synchronization and real-time updates across multiple clients. This real-time functionality is particularly useful for building interactive and collaborative applications where data changes need to be reflected immediately. Cloudinary, on the other hand, does not offer a built-in real-time database feature.

  4. Authentication and User Management: Firebase provides a comprehensive authentication and user management system, allowing developers to easily handle user registration, login, and authorization in their applications. It supports various authentication methods like email/password, social sign-in, and anonymous authentication. Cloudinary does not have built-in user management capabilities and relies on integration with external authentication systems.

  5. File Hosting and CDN: Both Cloudinary and Firebase offer file hosting and content delivery network (CDN) capabilities. However, Cloudinary specializes in media file hosting and provides advanced features like dynamic URL generation, on-the-fly image manipulation, and intelligent caching for optimal performance. Firebase hosting, on the other hand, offers a more general-purpose hosting solution suitable for hosting web applications and static files.

  6. Pricing Model: Cloudinary has a usage-based pricing model, where users pay based on the amount of media bandwidth and storage used. It offers various pricing plans with different levels of features and limits. Firebase, on the other hand, has a more flexible pricing model that includes both a free tier and a pay-as-you-go tier. The pricing is based on the usage of different Firebase products and services, including hosting, database, authentication, and storage.

In summary, Cloudinary offers specialized media management capabilities with advanced features for image and video optimization, while Firebase provides a comprehensive development platform with a wide range of services for building web and mobile applications, including hosting, database, authentication, and more.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Firebase, Cloudinary

Jared
Jared

Contractor at Insight Global

Aug 9, 2019

ReviewonFirebaseFirebase

I started using Firebase over 5 years ago because of the 'real-time' nature. I originally used to use Real Time Database, but now I use Cloud Firestore. I recommend using the Google Firebase PaaS to quickly develop or prototype small to enterprise level web/mobile applications. Since Google purchased Firebase, it has exploded and it growing rapidly. I also find some level of comfort that it is Backed by Google.

272k views272k
Comments
Noam
Noam

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsExpressJSExpressJSReactReact

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

1.15M views1.15M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Firebase
Firebase
Cloudinary
Cloudinary

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery.

Add the Firebase library to your app and get access to a shared data structure. Any changes made to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.;Firebase apps can be written entirely with client-side code, update in real-time out-of-the-box, interoperate well with existing services, scale automatically, and provide strong data security.;Data Accessibility- Data is stored as JSON in Firebase. Every piece of data has its own URL which can be used in Firebase's client libraries and as a REST endpoint. These URLs can also be entered into a browser to view the data and watch it update in real-time.;Real-time Synchronization- Firebase takes a new approach to the way data is moved around an app. Rather than using a traditional request & response model, it works by synchronizing data between devices. Whenever your data changes, all clients are immediately notified within milliseconds. The synchronized data is also persisted, allowing new clients to be immediately updated.;First-class Data Security- Traditional applications intermix security code with application code, whereas Firebase treats security as a first-class feature. You define your security policies in one place using a flexible rules language, and Firebase ensures that they are consistently enforced across all parts of your application. Having all your security logic in one place allows for easy auditing and helps you avoid security mistakes. The safety and security of your data is our top priority.;Automatic Scaling- The Firebase API is built from the ground up for performance and scale. Whenever your data changes, Firebase calculates the minimum set of updates required to keep all your clients in sync. In addition, all Firebase API functions are designed to scale linearly with the size of the data being synchronized. More importantly, Firebase handles all of the scaling and operations for you. Your app will scale from its first user to its first million without any code changes.;Servers are Optional- Firebase can provide all of the data storage, control, and transmission needs of most apps. In many cases, Firebase can completely replace your server and server-side code. This means you no longer need to build complicated backend software and can instead focus on your application logic and your customers.
Upload images to a cloud-based storage; Upload video to cloud-based storage; Automatic backup and revision tracking; Many image manipulation capabilities & effects; Smart resizing & face detection based thumbnails; Handling PDFs, sprites, watermarks, social profile pictures; Fast CDN delivery with advanced caching; Automatic image optimization; Powerful dashboard, media library and reports; RESTful APIs, intuitive URL based transformations; Image metadata and semantic data extraction; Integration SDKs for web & mobile frameworks; Custom domain (CNAME) support; Authenticated URLs; On-the-fly Video transcoding ; On-the-fly Video overlays;
Statistics
Stacks
42.5K
Stacks
634
Followers
36.0K
Followers
594
Votes
2.0K
Votes
179
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 371
    Realtime backend made easy
  • 270
    Fast and responsive
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 215
    Real-time
  • 191
    JSON
Cons
  • 31
    Can become expensive
  • 16
    No open source, you depend on external company
  • 15
    Scalability is not infinite
  • 9
    Not Flexible Enough
  • 7
    Cant filter queries
Pros
  • 37
    Easy setup
  • 31
    Fast image delivery
  • 26
    Vast array of image manipulation capabilities
  • 21
    Free tier
  • 11
    Heroku add-on
Cons
  • 5
    Paid plan is expensive
Integrations
Trigger.io
Trigger.io
Famo.us
Famo.us
Backbone.js
Backbone.js
Ember.js
Ember.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
AppHarbor
AppHarbor
Heroku
Heroku
Node.js
Node.js
Django
Django
WordPress
WordPress
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Ruby
Ruby
Python
Python
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Firebase, Cloudinary?

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

imgix

imgix

imgix is the leading platform for end-to-end visual media processing. With robust APIs, SDKs, and integrations, imgix empowers developers to optimize, transform, manage, and deliver images and videos at scale through simple URL parameters.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

OpenCV

OpenCV

OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase